Matthew “Max” Neilson, 18, says that his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when school officials at Irmo High School in Columbia, South Carolina allowed a student to proceed with the benediction when he graduated on May 30th. According to reports, Neilson emailed the principal prior to graduation to express his concerns. The principal replied by pointing him to the district policy, which states that if a prayer is to take place at a school event, it “will be given by a student volunteer” and that it must be “non-sectarian and non-proselytizing in nature.” Neilson also met with the principal, as well as the district superintendent. Additionally, two letters were sent to the school board by the Freedom from Religion Foundation, based in Wisconsin. They may be read here and here.
However, because Irmo High School allows students to vote each year on whether prayer will be a part of the graduation ceremony, and the majority of students voted in favor this time, officials did not wish to get involved.
“[W]hile I empathize with your position, I do not believe that I can in good conscience grant your request for me to step in and interfere with the decision of a majority of students who voted earlier this school year to include a prayer at their graduation ceremony,” wrote Superintendent Dr. Stephen Heffner in a reply letter. “As I mentioned to you during our conference, while I am a staunch supporter of the separation of Church and State, I do not believe that Freedom of Religion should be interpreted as requiring Freedom from Religion within the public schools.”
Because Heffner and others allowed the prayer to proceed, Neilson said that he believed “[t]he district didn’t feel like it needed to find time for me and my non-religious and non-Christian friends.”
He also elaborated further: “I support every individual’s rights to their religion as strongly as I support my right to be free of one. It is not that I did not want my classmates praying; this entire time my support has been strongly in favor of a moment of silence, where individuals of all faiths could take time to pray, instead of just the Christian majority. … If, during the moment of silence, anyone wanted to stand and pray aloud, I suppose that’d be okay with me, since the school wouldn’t be ‘sponsoring’ that action.”
Neilson also told a local television station that he filed the lawsuit, in part, out of his duty as an Eagle Scout to uphold the Constitution, which includes what he views as being a violation of the Establishment Clause.
However, some may be curious about this statement, since Neilson has also acknowledged in other comments that the scout oath begins with, “On my honor, I will do my duty to God and my country.”
“It is correct to say that, I violated aspects of the scouting programs creeds, but always remained in the right spirit through doing what I feel is right, standing up against injustice, setting positive examples — the sort of thing they teach you to do in scouts,” he explained. “Strictly speaking, there are a number of reasons that the scouting program could have rejected me, but I was able to stand on the kinds of character qualities within my troop, and no one ever felt compelled to go tell national that I didn’t fit the right spiritual bill.”
ChristianNews.net recently asked The Boy Scouts of America how the organization handles these types of conflicts of belief.
“To become an Eagle Scout, a boy completes specific requirements – as is the case for other ranks – and then must undergo a board of review, where a review of the requirements is conducted for each rank,” Boy Scouts of America representative Deron Smith explained. “In this case, the scout went before a board of review, who confirmed that he had met the requirements to be awarded the Eagle rank. That represents a past achievement, much like a diploma. The fact that someone may subsequently indicate that they do not believe in the values of scouting or our principles, does not indicate they did not earn their achievements in scouting consistent with our values and standards,” he added.
Neilson claims that he upheld the scout oath by committing to his own concept of God.
“In my understanding of the scout oath, duty [to] the nation is just as important as duty to God. Also, I am not rejecting God; God was never upon me,” he outlined. “I say the scout oath with full sincerity. My understanding of God in that sense is more alike to a set of ideals, instead of a conscious figure which tampers in the lives of lesser beings.”
Smith advised that Neilson is no longer a member of the Boy Scouts, and did not believe that the issue pertained to scouting. When it was explained that Neilson’s position that his rank as an Eagle Scout was one of the motivations that compelled him to file the lawsuit, Smith declined further comment.
The decision of whether student-led prayer may continue at Irmo High School and other public schools within the Lexington-Richland 5 School District now is in the hands of the federal court.