Proposed North Carolina Law Would Put Topless Women Behind Bars

Raleigh, North Carolina — A bill seeking to close up loopholes in North Carolina’s indecent exposure law is headed for a full vote in the state legislature, criminalizing any woman who appears topless in public.

Current statutes in the state prohibit the display of one’s private parts, but say nothing about breasts. A state court of appeals ruled in 1970 that breasts cannot be considered private parts — that reproductive organs only fall under the category.

However, in recent years, North Carolina residents have become concerned about the increase of toplessness in some cities, especially Asheville, where the annual topless “women’s equality” march is held in the public streets. Asheville was at the focus of last year’s “Go Topless” national event, which was organized by Jeff Johnson of Huntsville, Alabama, the 59-year-old manager of Over the Rainbow Pediatrics, who also serves as a children’s baseball and basketball coach and the youth entertainer “Sparkles the Clown.” Thousands attend the march each year, including young children.

As previously reported, at least one woman was also spotted going topless at Asheville’s Bele Chere Arts and Music Festival last summer. At one point, a senior citizen attempted to cover the bare-chested woman, but several officers restrained the elderly lady from doing so. When nearby Christians expressed their concern, police notified them that toplessness is legal in the state.

Christian News Network phoned Governor Beverly Perdue’s office and Asheville City Hall following the event to inquire why such acts were “legal,” but calls were not returned.

Due to the increase of incidents such as these, state Representative Rayne Brown recently proposed a bill that would make toplessness illegal. Brown’s legislation, which cleared the House Judiciary Committee with only one no vote, would make it a crime for a woman to expose her entire breast in public.

“There’s some confusion about the [current] law,” she told reporters. “I think our state deserves clarity on this issue.”

  • Connect with Christian News

Under Brown’s proposal, if a woman is discovered with her breasts completely uncovered, she could be charged with a misdemeanor and face 30 days in jail. Should police determine that the woman was attempting to cause sexual arousal with her actions, she may be charged with a felony, and imprisoned for up to six months.

Breastfeeding will not be criminalized by the statute.

While many are supportive of the bill, others state that women who are bent on being topless may find ways around the law if it passes, such as covering only the bottom of their breasts with tape.

“You know what they say, duct tape fixes everything,” Representative Tim Moore of Cleveland stated.

Some women assert that it is their constitutional right to be bare-chested.

“Centuries of patriarchal, top-down religious education have trained women to be subservient to men, to be only child bearers and homemakers and to remain chaste. We must remember that it was less than 100 years ago that women finally won the right to vote in this country,” stated Go Topless president Nadine Gary. “Today, their emancipation is expanding to all aspects of life.”

However, others are deeply offended by the displays. Politicians Carl Mumford and Chad Nesbitt, both of Asheville, chastised area churches last year for doing nothing to stand against what they call “shameless and lawless” activity.

“The faith based community, per usual, played it safe and didn’t say a word.  There remains a big difference in a house of worship and a religious country club devoted to member services,” the men declared. “Asheville has been called a ‘Cesspool of Sin’ – it’s a title that fits and an opportunity for people of faith. Less so for people of comfort.”

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Daniel

    What about a good looking guy without a shirt causing sexual arousal in others by his actions, should he be charged with a felony, and imprisoned for up to six months?

  • William Pickering

    I’m a Christian who is appalled at the idea that fellow Christians would be quick to condemn a woman, who walks around topless, but says little to nothing about a man doing the exact same thing. It isn’t a matter of what is indecent, or morally wrong, as it is the ideology that women are the fruit of evil. Seriously, have you “Christians” not read the Bible?

    I digress, we need to get over this women’s topless issue, let them have the final say, individually, of whether or not they take their tops off. Otherwise, force men to put theirs back on.

    Before anyone attempts to suggest this, I am a step father of two (boy and girl), and a father of one. We have no issues with our kids seeing a woman topless, as long as it isn’t being used in a more provocative means than what a man would use his for.