Obama Files Supreme Court Briefs Endorsing Same-Sex ‘Marriage’

Washington, D.C. — The Obama administration has filed two Supreme Court briefs in support of homosexual marriage, one challenging the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and another seeking to overturn California’s Proposition 8.

The first, which was filed one week ago today, asserted that DOMA violates the United States Constitution by denying federal benefits to any other relationship outside of a married man and woman.

“Section 3 of DOMA violates the fundamental constitutional guarantee of equal protection,” the document states, which was signed by Solicitor General Donald Verrilli. “The law denies to tens of thousands of same-sex couples who are legally married under state law an array of important federal benefits that are available to legally married opposite-sex couples. Because this discrimination cannot be justified as substantially furthering any important governmental interest, Section 3 is unconstitutional.”

The second brief, which was submitted Thursday — the deadline for filing in the Proposition 8 case, likewise contends that California’s homosexual marriage law violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

“California’s extension of all of the substantive rights and responsibilities of marriage to gay and lesbian domestic partners particularly undermines the justifications for Proposition 8,” it states.

The brief also took issue with those who believe that marriage is meant for procreation.

“As this court has recognized, marriage is much more than a means to deal with accidental offspring,” it stated. “Petitioner’s unduly narrow conception of the institution of marriage would hardly be recognizable to most of its participants.”

  • Connect with Christian News

As previously reported, Barack Obama had outlined in an interview with Dan Ashley of ABC affiliate KGO-TV last week that he was contemplating whether his administration should weigh in on the Supreme Court cases.

“The solicitor general is still looking at this. I have to make sure that I’m not interjecting myself too much into this process particularly when we’re not a party to the case,” Obama explained. “I can tell you, though, obviously my personal view, which is that I think that same-sex couples should have the same rights and be treated like everybody else. And that’s something that I feel very strongly about [and] my administration’s acting on wherever we can.”

The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in both the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and Proposition 8 cases next month and rule on the matter in June. The Defense of Marriage Act was signed into law by then President Bill Clinton in September 1996 after clearing the House and Senate with overwhelming support. In addition to providing a federal definition of marriage, the law bars homosexual relationships from being recognized by the IRS or the Social Security Administration, and also excludes homosexuals that serve as government workers from being recognized as a couple in order to obtain insurance benefits.

The matter surrounding Proposition 8, the second case before the court, hails back to 2008 when voters in California were presented with a ballot initiative asking if residents wished to enshrine marriage in the state as being between a man and woman. The measure, which sought to add an amendment to the state Constitution to protect the Biblical definition of marriage from infringement, passed by five percentage points.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • http://anziulewicz.livejournal.com Chuck Anziulewicz

    As someone who believes very strongly in marriage equality for Gay couples, I need to point out that the federal government has complicated the issue more than anyone. While it is true that the Constitution says nothing about marriage, there are 1,138 legal benefits, protections, and responsibilities (according to the Government Accountability Office) that the federal government automatically bestows on married couples. Much of this has to do with tax law and Social Security. So it simply wouldn’t do for a Gay couple that is legally married in Iowa to suddenly become UN-married if they move someplace else.

    Straight couples have never had to jump through these kinds of hoops. Thanks to the “Full Faith & Credit” clause, if any Straight couple flies off to Las Vegas for a drunken weekend and gets married by an Elvis impersonator, that marriage is automatically honored in all 50 states. Gay couples, however, are held to a different (and hence unconstitutional) legal standard.

    The only way marriage can be a “States Rights” issue is for the federal government to get out of the marriage business completely, and do away with the 1,138 benefits it grants to married couples. Tell me how thrilled most married couples would be with THAT.