Ohio Lawmakers Introduce State Religious Freedom Restoration Act

OhioCOLUMBUS, OH — Two Ohio lawmakers introduced a state version of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) this week, complementing the federal law that is already the standard across the nation.

Representatives Tim Derickson (R) and Bill Patmon (D) held a press conference on Wednesday in the state capital to outline the purpose of the bill, and also issued a news release the same day.

“For most Ohioans, faith and worship play a vital role in their lives and provide a sense of hope and community,” Derickson stated. “We are privileged as Americans to have a guaranteed right to free speech and free exercise of religion. It is important that religious and political leaders work together to defend religious liberties on behalf of our citizens of all faiths, and implementing a Religious Freedom Restoration Act in Ohio will help to accomplish this goal.”

The bi-partisan bill seeks to ensure that practices such as wearing a cross to work, posting Christian artwork or hosting student-led prayer at school events, and other public displays of faith, are protected.

During the news conference, Patmon spoke of his belief that government came from God, and it is therefore government’s duty to protect the freedoms bestowed on the nation by God.

“[The Declaration of Independence] talks about how our right as human beings are not given to us by government, nor the Constitution, but by God,” he said. “Protect what God has given you; that is the whole idea.”

“The Northwest Ordinance, which Ohio is a part of, [said] that in order to have good government, religion is necessary,” Patmon continued. “Well, why is it necessary? Because somebody has to have the scales of justice. Where did the scales of justice come from? I would submit to you, if you look deeply, that’s a biblical idea.”

  • Connect with Christian News

Therefore, the men seek to protect religious freedom in the state from activist judges by ensuring that the “strict scrutiny” standard is applied in all lawsuits that challenge religious practices. The standard, commonly used in courts across the country, requires that the regulation have a “compelling government interest” in order to pass constitutional scrutiny.

The men state that because they have observed religious freedoms being eroded in the courts in other states, they wish to ensure proper protection in Ohio.

“In this case, we want to make sure—perfectly sure—that if someone out there wants to put up an expression of their religion, wants to pray in school, that they’re not put upon and pushed around,” Patmon continued. “And that’s why I signed on to this legislation.”

Currently, 17 states have similar religious freedom statutes on the books. The federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act was signed into law in 1993 by then-President Bill Clinton, but only applies to federal laws. The U.S. Supreme Court has urged states to enact their own RFRA law to protect citizens.

The Ohio proposal is approved by Family Research Council, the Liberty Foundation, Citizens for Community Values, Citizen Link and other national and local religious groups.

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Cheryl

    Right on! Thank you for defending our religious rights. God Bless

  • Sir Tainly

    We need religious freedom.
    We need to apply the freedom to others as well as ourselves.
    We need to balance the freedom to practice our religion with our right to be free of others’ religious edicts and also our right to be free from religious abuse.

    To me this law seems a good attempt to strike the right balance.

  • Rev. Candy Lacey-Partlow

    As long as it applies to ALL religions, not just Christians.