Michigan Mayor Denies Atheist Request to Erect ‘Reason Station’ Near City Hall ‘Prayer Station’

prayingWARREN, Mich. — A mayor in Michigan has denied the request of an atheist activist to erect a ‘reason station’ near an existing ‘prayer station’ at city hall.

Warren resident and member of the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF) Douglas Marshall recently submitted a request to the Downtown Development Authority to use the atrium at city hall on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. to run a “reason station,” where he would promote free thought. However, according to reports, Marshall requested the same times that the “prayer station” is utilized to offer prayers for residents.

Mayor Jim Fouts denied the request, stating that Marshall’s display was meant to purposefully interfere with the “prayer station” and could lead to disruption. He remarked that FFRF seeks to remove God from public life and he would not allow Marshall, whom he called a “designated hitter” for the organization, to succeed in the group’s efforts in his city.

“To my way of thinking, your group is strictly an anti-religion group intending to deprive all organized religions of their constitutional freedoms or at least discourage the practice of religion,” Fouts wrote. “The City of Warren cannot allow this.”

“I believe it is this group’s intention to disrupt those who participate in the prayer station, which would also be a violation of the freedom of religion amendment,” he continued. “For these reasons, I cannot approve of your request.”

Marshall told the Detroit News that he has complained about the presence of the “prayer station” in the past.

“I have complained to the mayor that I thought it was a violation of the Constitution for the city to allow public property to be used by a church to proselytize their religion,” he said.

  • Connect with Christian News

He now asserts that Fouts refusal is a violation of his right to free speech, and denies that FFRF had anything to do with his request for the “reason station.”

However, this is not the first time that Marshall has tussled with Fouts. In 2011, he and FFRF sued the City of Warren for denying his request to place a Winter Solstice sign near an outdoor nativity scene.

“There are no Gods, no devils, no angels, no Heaven or Hell,” the sign was to read. “There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds.”

The federal courts ruled in favor of the city, noting that the majority of the city’s Christmas scenery was secular in nature anyway.

Marshall told reporters this week that in light of Fout’s recent denial he will “have to get counsel and determine what my options are.” But Foust says he thinks he knows what Marshall is up to.

“He can say he’s independent of the foundation, but he is a front for the foundation. He is a spokesperson for the foundation, a symbol of the foundation, and at the minimum, he is a shill for the foundation,” Fouts contended. “He wants a reason station as a protest against the prayer station.”


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • Tat Wadjet

    While everyone has a right to use public land, I agree that there should be a proper scheduling of events so that there is no disruption. This goes for any use of said public facilities. Public means just that. Public. No one should be denied usage. That being said, most here seem confused about what the constitution actually does say, what it does not say, and are confusing the revised version of the pledge as being part of the constitution, and on top of that, insinuating that this nation was built on a theocracy. I strongly encourage everyone to educate themselves on words that are used in the constitution and what they mean, as well as educate themselves on the pledge of allegiance both pre and post 1954 in regards to changes made and reasons for those changes. Blindly following rhetoric while misquoting our founding documents for this country only encourage blind ignorance. Please educate yourself, and set out to educate others with their misquotations and erroneous representations as well.