New Undercover Video Captures Crowd Chuckling as Abortionist Tells of Eyeball That ‘Fell Down Into My Lap’

A new undercover video released by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) features clips of various Planned Parenthood officials and other abortion advocates making nonchalant statements about the abortion process, including that the baby’s eyeballs fell into their lap or that they had to tear off a leg to avoid technically performing a partial-birth abortion.

The footage, which was removed by YouTube on Thursday, reportedly was recorded at the 2014 and 2015 National Abortion Federation conventions. The video was marked as a “preview” of longer forthcoming presentation.

“You go in there, and you go, ‘Am I getting the uterus or the fetus? Oh, good, fetus,'” said Susan Robinson of Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, holding a pair of forceps to demonstrate and making a grasping sound effect. “What have I got? Nothing. Let’s try again.”

“If I’m doing a procedure, and I’m seeing that I’m in fear that it’s about to come to the umbilicus (navel), I might ask for a second set of forceps to hold the body at the cervix and pull off a leg or two, so it’s not PBA (partial-birth abortion),” stated Ann Schutt-Aine, the director of abortion services for Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast.

“An eyeball just fell down into my lap, and that is gross!” also declared Uta Landy, the founder of Planned Parenthood’s Consortium of Abortion Providers (CAPS), generating laughter.

The video also features officials explaining that certain body parts are in demand from biomedical companies.

“You know, sometimes she’ll tell me she wants brain, and we’ll, you know, leave the calvarium (head) in till last, and then try to basically take it,” outlined Deborah Nucatola, the senior director of medical services for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

  • Connect with Christian News

“I get a lot of oohs and ahhs from StemExpress. You know, they’re wanting livers,” Leslie Drummond of Planned Parenthood Mar Monte also remarked. “Last week I was in Sacramento, and she said, ‘I need four intact limbs.’ And I said, ‘You want what?'”

According to reports, U.S. District Judge William Orrick is now considering charging CMP director David Daleiden with contempt for releasing the video. Orrick had issued a preliminary injunction in February 2016 banning Daleiden from releasing any videos recorded at the National Abortion Federation convention.

The Federation had sued in July 2015 to stop the footage from being made public, claiming that it could jeopardize the safety of its members.

“The safety and security of our members is our top priority,” President Vicki Saporta said in a statement. “That security has been compromised.”

While YouTube removed CMP’s video on Thursday, a pro-life news outlet copied the video and uploaded it to its own channel.

“How can the country stand by while we commit these atrocities against our own children?” asked Lila Rose of Live Action following the release of the footage. “Planned Parenthood and NAF abortionists laugh about heads getting stuck and casually discuss the dismemberment of babies, fully formed, at five and six months. Meanwhile, their public defenders in the media and their paid spokespeople claim that the group is committing no wrong, that they are a public health service. How long will we be blind to the brutal destruction of these vulnerable babies?”


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • InTheChurch

    Pro-choice supporters, how does an MD remove a baby’s eye from it’s eye socket?

    • Chris

      You would need to ask a nurse or doctor. That’s assuming that the video is genuine and not the result of more propaganda.

      • Oboehner

        It is a well-known fact the infants are dismembered during an abortion, but whatever helps you sleep at night…

        • Jason Todd

          Chris doesn’t care. No heart, no soul, nothing. Just darkness, like every other person who defends these disgusting, evil acts.

      • InTheChurch

        Hey Chris, hope all is good. I got an answer. They push on the spine and that pressure pushes out the eye ball; Reverse Stroke. Pretty awful.

        • Chris

          Oh yuck. It really sounds awful. Quite frankly I don’t know how doctors and nurses cope with all the things they have to do. I couldn’t do any of that stuff.

          • InTheChurch

            I know. How can a doctor sleep at night knowing what they did. Money is the only reason to sleep in peace at night.

          • Chris

            We’ll have to beg to differ there.

    • Ginger

      Pressure from behind. Put pressure on the spinal cord that puts pressure upward into the skull cavity. Reverse stroke effect. The eyeball is only held in place by the optic nerve and muscles around the eye. Certainly very weak at the gestational age.
      If you ever had an English bull dog, you would know.

      • InTheChurch

        Thank you for the information. How can someone say those babies are not babies when they are forced to have a reverse stroke?

        • Chris

          There is a philosophical argument concerning that. Goes like this.

          Suppose a woman went out with a guy and he kidnapped her, took her home and connected her to his son as a blood supply. He gives her assurances that he’ll release her in nine months.

          Now the boy does desperately need this blood supply. Does she have the right to escape if she gets the chance? Most people would say she does. Even if, by escaping, she ends up killing the boy. Now transfer that conclusion to abortion.

          • InTheChurch

            I get it. That is a tough situation.
            Here in America, the biggest issue for abortion is not the act or who is doing it. It’s who is paying for it. Taxes pay for abortions. a woman and man can pay for their own abortion all they want. But, my taxes should not pay for it.
            Is that the same in your country?

          • Chris

            “Here in America, the biggest issue for abortion is not the act or who is
            doing it. It’s who is paying for it.”

            That makes no sense to me. I suppose it’s merely a culture clash but aren’t the women also citizens in your society? Aren’t all members of your society taxed? So the women would be paying their own abortions through taxes.

            If your worry is about the rise in taxes take hert. There is a simple answer. The US pays as much for its military as the next six biggest spenders combined. So the answer is simple. Reduce military spending to say the next two biggest spenders and spend the remained on health and education. Problem solved.

            “Taxes pay for abortions. a woman
            and man can pay for their own abortion all they want. But, my taxes
            should not pay for it. ”

            But once the government has your money it isn’t yours anymore. Example: I don’t have a car. Why should my tax dollars pay for roads I don’t use? But that’s NOT how a government operates. If they had to take into account the views of every single person they’d never spend a cent. You’d have no military, no fire brigades, no police. Nothing paid for by the public purse because someone would object.

            “Is that the same in your country?”

            No. In Australia there’s a few grumbles about waste of public money but, by and large, we accept that taxes need to be paid.

          • InTheChurch

            “aren’t the women also citizens in your society? Aren’t all members of your society taxed? So the women would be paying their own abortions through taxes.” yes they are. We all pay our taxes. I see your point that they have paid for it already. I get that. I understand your car analogy. Makes perfect sense.
            We get taxed 4 times or ways; Federal, state, county and city. Each one gets a piece of the pie (almost lunch and I’m hungry). We pay our taxes and the four governments spends according to need; fire, police, transportation, education and so on. Like you guys do it to. I agree with you, the government will spend it as they see fit. We elect officials that agree with our views and spending ideas. We want leaders that will spend our money for needs and priorities. And abortion is not a need or priority.

          • Chris

            We only get three taxes – Federal, State, and Council Rates. That’s about it.

            “And abortion is not a need or priority.”

            Here irt can be considered a need but it depends upon the circumstance. For example, if the woman’s health is at risk then it is a need. Usually, however. it is considered an elective, which means the one who wants the op pays.

          • InTheChurch

            birth control vs medical problem

          • Chris

            Exactly so.

        • Ginger

          Hosea 14:16 “Samaria shall become desolate [bear and guilt]; for
          she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants
          shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”

          “Samaria” means “Watch tower” in the Hebrew. There will be no watchmen, or people to protect the truth word of God, Kenites are leading the people with their lies. God’s truth will be gone, and our land will become desolate which is void of God’s word. This is exactly what happened to the ancient “House of Israel” seven hundred years before Christ. Then in the latter days, in our generation, it will happen again in a spiritual sense. The spiritual life of the land will become desolate for the true word of God.

          It will be swallowed up in a godless one world form of government, where worldly forms of reason, emotions, and false religious form will replace God’s Holy Word. “Man will do what is right in the sight of his own eyes.” He becomes his own judge, rather than doing what God’s word tells us we should do.

          Children today, are being taught from the heathen school system they teach and guide children reject the living God, and the environment which is feeding the minds of the youth with emptiness, we are witnessing this verse in action today. However, notice the last phrase,
          “their infants shall be dashed in pieces.” Have you ever seen how the
          butchers, which call themselves doctors, dismantle, and tear to pieces the innocent body of a unborn infant. They crush it, and dismantle it piece by piece, as they remove it from their mother’s womb. It’s worse than a wild animal seeking its prey.

          We have a soft [eastern wind] word for those seeking to murder their children today. It is called “Choice”. Would you select your pet to be slaughtered is such a fashion, never, it’s against all laws, as it should be. But to the unborn the “Kenite” law protects the “wild east” [doctors], while they practice their butchery.

          Mothers commit their bodies into the hands of these doctors [wild ones], to allow their knives to slaughter their little ones in the womb.

          El Shaddai, God Almighty help us.

          • InTheChurch

            Wow, never saw it that way

  • Oboehner

    And the video gets scrubbed.

  • Amos Moses

    Kim Jong-Un Consults With Planned Parenthood To Learn How To Cover Up Atrocities

  • Just think had the constitutional framers (like their 17th-century Colonial predecessors) established government and society upon Yahweh’s immutable/unchanging moral law (including Exodus 21:22-23), Planned Parenthood wouldn’t exist and millions of infants slaughtered in the mother’s wombs and later sold for parts would still be alive:

    “…3. Every problem America faces today can be traced back to the fact that the framers failed to expressly establish a government upon Yahweh’s immutable morality as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments. (Would infanticide and sodomy be tolerated, let alone financed by the government, if Yahweh’s perfect law and altogether righteous judgments were the law of the land? Would Islam be a looming threat to our peace and security if the First Amendment had been replaced with the First Commandment? Would Americans be in nearly as much debt if usury had been outlawed as a form of theft? Would crime be as rampant if “cruel and unusual punishment” had not been outlawed and criminals were instead punished with Yahweh’s altogether righteous judgments? Would we be on the fiscal cliff if we were taxed with a flat increase tax rather than a graduated income tax?)….

    “On February 27, 2009, James Dobson conceded that we have lost the culture wars. This is the consequence of Christians [including Dr. Dobson] having spent the last two centuries lopping at the rotten branches of our culture’s corrupt tree while watering and fertilizing its roots.

    “We should lop away at the tree’s corrupt branches (infanticide, sodomy, the economy, etc.). However, until the root of these problems is Biblically addressed, we will never shut down the infanticide mills, we will never defeat the sodomites, and we will never fix the economy. In short, we will never win the culture wars. This issue is more than important for anyone concerned about God, our nation, and the future of our posterity, it’s the cutting- edge issue of our day…..”

    For more, see our Featured Blog Article “5 Reasons the Constitution is Our Cutting-Edge Issue.” Click on my name, then our website. This article will be found at the top of our home page.

    Then find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar and receive a complimentary copy of a book that examines the Constitution by the Bible.

    • Jason Todd

      Are you promoting your blog?

    • Ginger

      “When we get ready to take the United States, we will not take it under the label of communism; we will not take it under the label of socialism. These labels are unpleasant to the American people, and have been speared too much. We will take the United States under labels we have made lovable; we will take it under liberalism, under progressivism, under democracy. But we will take it, we will.” – quote from Alexander Trachtenberg (1885-1966) at the National Convention of Communist Parties, Madison Square Garden, New York City, 1944

      Russia was the first country to legalize abortion on demand in 1920.

      Proverbs 6:16-19 KJV “These six things doth the LORD hate: yea seven are an abomination unto Him; A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart the deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.”
      A babe in the womb or out is totally innocent-it is murder! But how eroded has our Christian heritage become? People would rather remain silent while all sorts of evil rages around them. It will be the few that the Lord will bless for giving the truth.

      • Chris

        If the bible is so clear on abortion then why does the bible give a formula to induce abortion?

        • Robert

          The bible interprets bible not you or your preacher or the Talmud that also says intercourse with children under 6 is not wrong . you will find no Bible passage that interprets the passage your thinking of as abortion.

          • Chris

            As you said it’s NOT you that interprets the bible either.

            You are simply mistaken as regards the passages I’ve mentioned.

            As I stated the bible gives a formula for abortion. If the bible is so dead set against abortion why does it have the formula?

            Since the bible gives a formula for abortion then it must think abortion, at least in some circumstances, is ok.

        • sagat

          Please point me to the verse that talks about inducing abortion. You are clearly an atheist who knows nothing of scriptures and needs Jesus in their lives

          • Chris

            “You are clearly an atheist who knows nothing of scriptures and needs Jesus in their live.”

            Really? I’m not an atheist, I’m a Zoroastrian. I was a born-again Christian for several years. Numbers 21: 21-28. Here’s the most important sections of the verses “21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[a] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell.”

            &

            “27 If
            she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. 28 If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will
            be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.”

            You really need to learn your bible.

          • sagat

            That is not proving abortion or procedures you are once again taking things out of context. How can Jesus says he loves children and at the same time harm them? does it make sense to you?

          • Chris

            Context. A husband suspects his wife of infidelity because she is pregnant. He takes her to a priest and has her drink a concoction after making an oath. If she IS guilty of adultery she will miscarry. Since the miscarriage is induced what do you call it except an abortion?

          • Chris

            “How can Jesus says he loves children and at the same time harm them?”

            Well it might be that Jesus didn’t see a fetus as a child.

            Or it might be that the authors of the gospels [who were anonymous] got that part wrong. That Jesus never said any such thing.

            Or…well you get the idea.

          • sagat

            Once again you are trying to interpret scriptures taking it out of context using your secular views

          • Chris

            Um. I’m not interpreting anything merely giving alternatives. Alternatives which, by the way, were first proposed by Christians.

  • J J

    The old Moloch religion, still very much alive.

  • Nidalap

    One imagines the WWII death camp operators having just such discussions…

    • Chris

      One may imagine many things.

  • Robert

    Talmud teachings that infants have no value and that you can even have sexual intercourse with them because there not of any value are not funny. There as sick as the rabbis who thought it up.