Couple Awarded $50 Million in ‘Wrongful Birth’ Suit After Son Born With Disabilities

OliverSEATTLE — A jury has awarded $50 million to a Washington couple who filed a wrongful birth suit after their son was born with mental and physical disabilities.

Brock and Rhea Wuth, both school teachers, had been advised that they had a 50-50 chance of conceiving a child with a genetic defect. They sought genetic counseling in the matter as Brock’s cousin was born with a chromosomal disorder.

After Rhea became pregnant, Valley Medical Center in Renton sent tests to LabCorp in North Carolina to determine whether the child had any abnormalities. As the tests came back normal, the family was assured that the baby was fine.

However, when Rhea gave birth in July 2008, it was discovered that the infant had “unbalanced chromosomal translocation.” The Wuths then filed suit against Valley Medical Center and LabCorp in 2010, advising that had they known that the child—a boy, who they named Oliver—had defects, they would have sought an abortion.

According to the Times-News, attorney Todd Gardner cited the birth of the baby and the care that he now requires—likely for the rest of his life—as damages that required compensation. He asserted that Valley Medical Center had failed to inform LabCorp of all of the pertinent information, including that Brock Wuth carried a genetic abnormality from his family history. Gardner also blamed LabCorp for not following up with the Medical Center when it did not provide details on where to look for the possible defect.

“Valley messed it up at the beginning; Lab Corp. should have got it. They both failed,” he told local television station KOMO. “You have a disaster.”

Earlier this month, a jury selected by the King County Superior Court agreed with Gardner and the Wuths, and awarded the Wuth’s $50 million—$25 million to the couple and $25 million to Oliver.

  • Connect with Christian News

Valley Medical Center then issued a statement apologizing for the “tragedy” that had occurred.

“We are very sorry for the tragedy the Wuth family has suffered,” it wrote. “We continue to believe that the Valley Medical Center staff members acted appropriately.”

LabCorp said that it is considering an appeal.

“We believe the facts and the law do not support the verdict,” the company stated. “LabCorp acted properly and diligently in performing the test that was ordered by the physician. We will consider all available options, including post-trial motions and appeal, if necessary.”

But some are expressing sadness over the wrongful birth suit being filed in the first place and the impact that it could one day have on the child.

“I was given the test, not to be able to abort, but to prepare if there was disability,” one commenter named Joan wrote. “My tests also were fine and I gave birth to a very sick little boy. I still love him no matter what. He’s 17 now and the light of my life regardless of disability.”

“Rejection by the ones who are supposed to love you above all others is a terrible thing to live with, and baby Oliver will continue to sense it as he grows older,” another named Judy stated. “These parents need the Lord, and I’m putting baby Oliver on my permanent prayer list. I predict he’ll do great things for the Lord one day.”

Oliver is now 5 1/2. He is obtaining special education as he speaks few words and is not yet able to climb the stairs or run.

Photo: KOMO-TV

Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

Dear Reader, has been of benefit and a blessing to you? For many years now, the Lord has seen fit to use this small news outlet as a strong influential resource in keeping Christians informed on current events from a Biblical worldview. Striving to bring you the news without compromise and with Christ in focus, we press on despite recent changes in Facebook and Google's algorithms, which has limited our readership, and, as a result, has affected operational site revenue. If you have benefited from our news coverage, would you please prayerfully consider becoming a Christian News Network supporter by clicking here to make a one-time or monthly donation to help keep the truth widely and freely published and distributed? May Christ continue to be exalted through this work!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Sir Tainly

    Well…at least they should be able to afford taking care of their special needs child. That has to lighten the burden considerably I should think.

    I wish the family the best and hope that the company does not delay the payout with endless appeals.

    They made a bad mistake and were taken to court…now they should pay.

    I hope that both parents are still going strong together with their child.

  • Angela

    To the person who said Jesus would forgive the woman upon request- Repentance means turning away from sin and truly sorrowing for it- and God knows whos sorry and who just planned to sin and ask for forgiveness upon request- After all Esau sought repentance with many tears and found it not. A child disabled or not knows its rejected and unwanted and will suffer emotionally and spiritually because of it. I’m also sorrowed that the company was sued when God obviously had a purpose for this child and hid his condition from those who would have killed him. All those who kill innocent children are in danger of hell and should seek repentance and deliverance in great fear immediately- God isn’t an insurance policy that you may do what you wish and seek to get your way afterward- It simply doesnt work that way-Thats what you get when you listen to man and do not seek the Spirit of God and study His Word for yourself- you get deceived. Also God is still able to heal today- I know first hand.

  • Kathleen Elizabeth Neely

    What hateful hateful evil parents. that poor dear child, who could be so cruel to their own offspring.