U.S. Supreme Court Halts Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ in Utah Pending Appeal

Supreme_Court WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has halted same-sex ‘marriages’ in Utah while an appeal is underway.

“The application for stay presented to Justice Sotomayor and by her referred to the court is granted,” a short order released by the court today outlined. “The permanent  injunction issued by the United States District Court for the District of Utah …  is stayed pending final disposition of the appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.”

As previously reported, a federal judge appointed by Barack Obama declared Utah’s ban on same-sex “marriage” unconstitutional last month, asserting that it violates the right to equal protection under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

“The State’s current laws deny its gay and lesbian citizens their fundamental right to marry and, in so doing, demean the dignity of these same-sex couples for no rational reason,” U.S. District Judge Robert J. Shelby wrote. “Accordingly, the court finds that these laws are unconstitutional.”

The state had argued that the law was necessary to protect interests in procreation and child-rearing, but Shelby contended that the state failed to show how homosexual “marriage” would harm heterosexuals.

“In the absence of such evidence, the State’s unsupported fears and speculations are insufficient to justify the State’s refusal to dignify the family relationships of its gay and lesbian citizens,” he stated.

The attorney general’s office then filed an appeal with the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals following Shelby’s ruling, but was denied. Therefore, it took its motion to the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting an emergency stay.

  • Connect with Christian News

“A stay is urgently needed to preserve these prerogatives pending appeal and, if necessary, this Court’s ultimate review, and to minimize the enormous disruption to the State and its citizens of having to potentially ‘unwind’ thousands more same-sex marriages should this Court ultimately conclude, as the State strongly maintains, that the district court’s judgment and injunction exceed its constitutional authority,” the legal brief filed with the court outlined.

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed, halting any further ceremonies while the case is under appeal.

Attorney James E. Magleby, who is representing those who are seeking to void the state’s marriage law, told reporters today that it “is obviously disappointing for the families in Utah who need the protection of marriage and now have to wait to get married until the appeal is over. … Every day that goes by, same-sex couples and their children are being harmed by not being able to marry and be treated equally.”

However, Utah Governor Gary Herbert said that the stay should have been issued weeks ago pending appeal.

“Clearly, the stay should have been granted with the original District Court decision in order to have avoided the uncertainty created by this unprecedented change,” he stated, according to the Associated Press.

Attorney General Sean Reyes agreed.

“This is the uncertainty that we were trying to avoid by asking the district court for a stay immediately after its decision,” he explained. “It is very unfortunate that so many Utah citizens have been put into this legal limbo.”

Utah’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex “marriage” was passed in 2004 during the November election with 66 percent of the vote.

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • John tancock JT

    Aaron, you have stated nonsense tbh, sorry to put it that way. No one in their right mind wd say the bible particularly the NT supports slavery. See 1 Tim 1v10 for a clear condemnation of slave trading. What Dyu expect the Christians of the first century to do, to revolt and seek to overturn the order of the empire…….don’t be daft. Wihin their own ranks thre was ‘no slave or free’. All were equal. Paul’s advice was to be good slaves, serve god! don’t rebel! or be untrustworthy? Those instructions of his were wise and good. If the infant churches had sought to overturn Slavs the persecution to come upon them would have been even greater. no one can read Philemon and think that The bible, first Christians or Paul were pro slavery.

  • James J. Grimes

    “The holiness of God is traumatic to unholy people.” —R.C. Sproul