Christian Legal Group May Sue After Hospital Refuses to Lift Ban on ‘God Bless America’ in Email

Hawks ssSTOCKTON, Calif. — A Christian legal organization is poised to file a lawsuit against a California hospital after officials continue to ban the use of the phrase ‘God bless America’ in email signatures.

As previously reported, Dameron Hospital employee Boots Hawks was called into his supervisor’s office last November and asked to remove the phrase from his email, which is one of three that he posts with his signature. “Excuses only satisfy the person making them” and “Change is either induced by inspiration or desperation” are also displayed on each email.

“I believe in America, and I believe in God so strongly,” Hawks told local television station KCRA. “And I believe that America needs a blessing.”

While Hawks complied with the directive, he also told his supervisor that he wanted to consult with an attorney about his rights.

Much to his surprise, Hawks was put on leave for “insubordination.” He returned to work this Wednesday to find that the combination on his lock had been changed and his computer password had been suspended.

As Hawks had contacted the Sacramento-based Pacific Justice Institute (PJI), the organization sent a letter to the hospital, demanding that it recant its actions. It noted that Hawks has been on staff for ten years and was once named “Employee of the Year.” He had served twenty years in the Army, earning the rank of Sergeant First Class.

As reports of the incident broke nationwide, the hospital partially recanted the reasons for putting Hawks on leave. A Dameron human resource official advised PJI that Mr. Hawks was no longer considered to be insubordinate, but stated that he may have been “disrespectful.” The hospital agreed to restore the lost pay from the time when Hawks was on leave, and advised that no punishment would be implied.

  • Connect with Christian News

However, Dameron officials continued to insist that Mr. Hawks refrain from including “God bless America” in his email signature. As it has not rescinded the ban months following the incident, attorneys with PJI state that they have filed a formal charge of discrimination with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. A complaint was also filed with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the Christian legal organization is additionally pursuing litigation, expecting to receive a right-to-sue notice at any time.

The group says that it would like to solve the matter out of court, but has been “surprised by Dameron Hospital’s complete lack of interest.”

“Over the last two months we have given Dameron Hospital multiple opportunities to rescind their ban on patriotic speech,” PJI President Brad Dacus said in a recent news release. “Inexplicably, they have chosen to ignore our efforts to resolve this conflict peacefully, and their window of opportunity is quickly closing.”

“It is both wrong and illegal to single out and silence the patriotic speech of a veteran who served his country honorably for more than twenty years,” he continued. “We intend to do whatever is necessary to vindicate his rights.”


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • David C.

    @Ray Fair: ANY company or organization has the right to monitor ANY and ALL activity on their computers, including e-mail. It’s not an invasion of privacy. Regardless of the merits of this issue, Mr Hawks is using the hospital’s computers which the courts have held that employees are NOT entitled to a right to privacy since they are doing work on those computers.

    Now if he were at home doing work for them on his OWN computer, they could monitor what he sends through their network or servers even if is personal since he is still using their equipment and resources. However, they could not just scan his whole system though. That’s left for the Department of Homeland Security when they aren’t interrogating people supposedly illegally filming movies in the cinema…