Republicans Compromise With Democrats After Rift Over Abortion Language in Trafficking Bill

CongressWASHINGTON — Republican lawmakers reached a compromise on Tuesday after Senate democrats blocked the advancement of a federal sex trafficking bill over concerns that abortion funding bans extended to private money.

As previously reported, the Justice for Victims of Human Trafficking Act had been presented last month by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and sought to increase penalties for those convicted of sexually exploiting children, engaging in human smuggling or holding women hostage as sex slaves. Fines collected from those engaged in such acts would be pooled into a fund that would be used to help victims of human trafficking.

But Democrats noted that the bill included a stipulation that none of the funds collected from fines would we allowed to be used for abortion services—with the exception of cases of rape, incest and the life of the mother. Some asserted that Republicans surreptitiously inserted the language without mention, and argued that banning money collected from private fines from being used for abortions went further than the prohibition in the federal Hyde Amendment. The amendment bans only federal taxpayer money from being used for abortions.

Therefore, Republicans offered a compromise over the issue, proposing two separate funds for human trafficking victims. The first fund would come from fines against those who commit sex trafficking crimes, and would be deposited into the U.S. Treasury, where money would be used toward legal aid, law enforcement, shelter, counseling and other non-medical services. It differed from the original amendment in that it removed the abortion language surrounding private money.

The second fund would come from appropriations already set aside by Congress for community health centers. The fund would mirror the Hyde Amendment in that it would prohibit money being used for abortion—with the exception of rape, incest and the life of the mother. Republicans had asserted last month that the abortion language in the original amendment would not stop women from obtaining abortions as those who are trafficked would be considered rape victims, and the bill provided an exception for rape.

Cornyn said that he was pleased with the compromise.

“I’m thrilled we were finally able to come together to break the impasse over this vital legislation, and I look forward to swift passage in the Senate so we can ensure victims of human trafficking receive the resources they need to restore their lives,” he said.

  • Connect with Christian News

In 2013, Rob Schwarzwalder of Washington’s Family Research Council wrote that he believes that there is a strong connection between the human trafficking and abortion industries.

“Abortion and human trafficking are evils every thoughtful Christian should oppose. Virtually all evangelicals would agree with that statement. What is not always considered, however, is the troubling relationship between these things and how they build upon one another in a growing cascade of moral horror,” he said.

Schwarzwalder pointed to the words of Steve Wagner, the former director for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Human Trafficking Program.

“If someone is being trafficked—which is to say, under the domination of a pimp/trafficker—she is by definition unable to provide informed consent to an abortion or to a regime of contraception. The victim has no voice in this decision,” Wagner explained. “Indeed, providing such services to a victim of sexual trafficking benefits only the trafficker by getting the victim back out on the street and making money sooner.”


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • UmustBKiddinMe

    This is important legislation. I’m glad to see that there were able to get it through.

  • Coach

    I couldn’t imagine what it’s like for a woman who’s raped, nevertheless, to kill the child because of what the father did is

    • UmustBKiddinMe

      “I couldn’t imagine what it’s like for a woman who’s raped”

      You should have stopped there, as your statement makes it clear that you are in no position to comment further.

    • FoJC_Forever

      The Wicked look for any reason to promote their heinous desire to shed innocent blood. They pretend to care about victims of rape, but only encourage them to be a party to murder. They compound one violation on top of another. Babies, which are procreated at conception, do not rape the mother carrying them and can be raised to honor God and be good, loving people. Using rape as an excuse to murder a child is as bad as using convenience or career or any other reason.

      Judgement is coming. The innocent blood will be avenged.

      Politicians are just playing their normal games. Pretend to be doing this or that, while they bask in the excesses of the super wealthy. It’s the system behind the scenes that is corrupt, most politicians are just toys and puppets.

  • The Last Trump

    Ah, the heartless Democrats at it again.

    “sought to increase penalties for those convicted of sexually exploiting children, engaging in human smuggling or holding women hostage as sex slaves. Fines collected from those engaged in such acts would be pooled into a fund that would be used to help victims of human trafficking”

    What a great bill, right?

    “But Democrats noted that the bill included a stipulation that none of the funds collected from fines would we allowed to be used for abortion services—with the exception of cases of rape, incest and the life of the mother.”

    What a ridiculous reason to prevent aid to the living victims of the godless and the sexually immoral. MUST fund the practice of TAKING lives!? These people are lost.

  • John C

    Those fines get put in the General funds of the United States and are Federal money, once the fine is paid to the United States it is no longer private funds. They should be banned for use in abortions.

  • Chris

    Here’s the issue: the legislation includes anti-abortion language,
    saying that victims—VICTIMS—of sex trafficking can’t have abortions paid
    for out of the victim compensation fund set up in the law, extending
    the Hyde amendment anti-abortion funding language to this program.

    This article lists only some of the facts. Victims of human trafficking would be denied abortions REGARDLESS of rape, incest or risk of life.

    In the first 100 days of our new congress, they have accomplished absolutely nothing. It is partisan politics as normal with one side or the other putting riders onto bills that the other side just can not accept.

  • me2u2

    Sex trafficking in the USA is almost entirely a myth. The police almost never find sex slaves. The anti-trafficking movement is actually a movement against consenting adult sex work.