Judge Rules Divorced Couple’s ‘Frozen Embryos’ Must Be ‘Thawed and Discarded’

Lee-compressedSAN FRANCISCO, Calif. — A judge in California has ruled that the frozen embryos of a divorced couple must be “thawed and discarded,” after the wife said she wanted them but the husband did not.

Dr. Mimi Lee was diagnosed with breast cancer the day before her marriage to Stephen Findley in 2010, and so the couple decided to create and store embryos to preserve Lee’s fertility. In doing so, the two had to sign an agreement with a fertility clinic that the embryos would be destroyed if they divorced.

In 2013, Lee and Findley separated, and Findley filed for divorce. But Lee, now 46, said she still wanted her babies and that they were her only hope of ever having a child. Findley wanted the five embryos destroyed because he didn’t want to have a child with Lee.

Lee and Findley fought the matter out in court, where Lee said she had a constitutional right to procreate. Her attorneys explained that the embryos were preserved so that “motherhood would not be a casualty of cancer.” Findley said he wanted the terms of the agreement upheld.

On Wednesday, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo sided with Findley and rejected Lee’s assertion that the signed document was only a consent form that could be changed like a medical directive.

While expressing empathy for Lee, the judge said that the contract took precedence and was legally binding.

“The court holds that while Lee might have a right to procreate in other circumstances not before the court, she does not have a right to procreate with Findley,” Massullo wrote.

  • Connect with Christian News

“IVF clinics and individuals who participate in the IVF process must have some certainty about dispositional choices before embryos are created,” she said. “It is a disturbing consequence of modern biological technology that the fate of nascent human life, which the embryos in this case represent, must be determined in a court by reference to cold legal principles.”

Lee’s attorneys are considering the legal options. Judge Massullo has stated that she will postpone her order for the embryos to be destroyed pending an appeal.

“I stayed focused on my babies [during the court battle] and that way that I’m their mom, and that really got me through,” Lee told ABC News with tears.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • Josey

    I feel really bad for her but she did sign a legal document stating that if the couple divorced the embryos would be destroyed. IMO, I think she would be wise in using her money into looking and seeking God about how to proceed in getting her desired way of procreating. The ex doesn’t want the babies since the divorce. I pray she can move on, it’s too bad she is already 46 and sad about the divorce or that they couldn’t come to an amicable decision.

  • staad

    Findley is scared shit she might use the babies for child support later on. fackin gay.

  • WorldGoneCrazy

    “and so the couple decided to create and store embryos to preserve Lee’s fertility”

    and

    ““The court holds that while Lee might have a right to procreate in other circumstances not before the court, she does not have a right to procreate with Findley,” Massullo wrote.”

    pro·cre·ate

    VERB (USED WITH OBJECT) [PRO·CRE·AT·ED, PRO·CRE·AT·ING.]

    1. to beget or generate (offspring).
    2. to produce; bring into being.

    embryo

    a new organism in the earliest stage of development. In humans this is defined as the developing organism from the fourth day after fertilization to the end of the eighth week. After that the unborn baby is usually referred to as the fetus. adj., adj em´bryonal, embryon´ic.

    So, the procreation between Lee and Findlay has already occurred. The judge’s ruling is illogical AND clearly objectively immoral, as she realized when she wrote:

    “It is a disturbing consequence of modern biological technology that the fate of nascent human life, which the embryos in this case represent, must be determined in a court by reference to cold legal principles.”

    She knows that this is the destruction of human beings, yet is letting a legal contract allow it based on a clearly illogical ruling.

    • Becky

      Well said…I couldn’t agree more.

      • WorldGoneCrazy

        Thanks, Becky – right back atya!