‘Born in the Wrong Species?’ Woman Claims She Is a Cat Trapped in a Human Body

Nano-compressedOSLO, Norway — A woman in Norway claims that she was “born in the wrong species” and asserts that she is really a cat trapped in a human body.

Nano, 20, from Oslo recently appeared in a news broadcast posted to the NRK P3 Verdens Rikeste Land YouTube channel, wearing fake cat ears and a tail as she asserted, “I’ve been a cat all my life.”

“I realized I was a cat when I was 16 when doctors and psychologists found out what was ‘the thing’ with me,” she said. “Under my birth there was a genetic defect.”

“You are born like this?” the interviewer asks.

“Yes, I’m born like this,” Nano responds. “Born in the wrong species. … It’s obvious I’m a cat when I start purring and meowing and walking around on four legs and stuff like that.”

The woman is consequently shown crawling on her hands and knees on the floor and scratching at the door as she looks out the window.

At one point, as she is interviewed on the street, Nano hisses and jumps back at the sight of a nearby dog.

  • Connect with Christian News

“What happened?” the interviewer asks.

“There is a dog over there,” Nano replies.

She states that due to her feline instinct, she “automatically reacts by hissing.”

Nano also claims that she likes to sleep in the sink and on window sills, and sometimes chases mice.

“I have been running a lot after animals that can be seen in the shadows,” she states. “I have tried, but have never managed to catch [a mouse].”

“It is exhausting, but you get used to living with cat acts and cat instincts,” Nano says. “My psychologist told me I can grow out of it, but I doubt it. I think I will be cat all my life.”

In 2012, the late Dennis Avner made headlines when he went through a series of body modification surgeries to make himself look like a female tiger. Avner, who went by the name “Stalking Cat,” wore fangs, grew his nails long to look like claws, and obtained tattoos on his face that looked like stripes. He was found dead in his home in November 2012.

He tried to transform “himself not just into a tiger, but a female tiger at that, blurring and exploring the gender line as much as the species line,” friend Shannon Larratt told reporters.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • gizmo23

    This is hilarious. Why it’s a story here I have no idea, but thanks

    • afchief

      She must be a liberal!

      • Amos Moses

        She must be under a demonic delusion and needs prayer for her redemption.

        • Becky

          I think these two have seen how easy it is to get away with such rubbish that they decided to give it a go.

        • afchief

          That to!

        • BobRumba

          No, she’s just an attention starved nut.

          • Amos Moses

            And in need of Christ to her salvation from that.

          • BobRumba

            She doesn’t need Christ for that. A good shrink would suffice.

          • Amos Moses

            We all need Christ, for that and every thing else we do in violation of His Law.

          • BobRumba

            Many of us do just fine without him.

      • gizmo23

        I understand there are “special” times you like to dress up as a chicken

        • afchief

          Well people who are liberals are welfare bums, food stamp sellers, union goons, pot smokers, pill poppers, lesbians, God deniers, sodomites, abortionists, transgenders, transsexuals, convicts, parolees, illegal immigrants, drug dealers, arsonist, New Yorkers, feminist, Leninists, Trotskyists, Castroists, porch urinators, police car defecators, and man haters. psychopaths and sociopaths……and now cat people!!!

          LOL!

          • gizmo23

            You fotgot chicken ranchers

          • afchief

            And godless liberal trolls who lie on Christian websites.

          • gizmo23

            cluck cluck

      • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

        Why must she be a liberal?

        • afchief

          See comment to gizmo

    • TheKingOfRhye

      Probably they’re trying to compare this woman to transgender people, is my guess. Or at least inviting people to make that comparison.

      • Angel Jabbins

        Well, there is a comparison, isn’t there? Transgenders wants us to believe they were just born attracted to both sexes. They can’t help it. Transgenderism was once considered a mental health issue. Now it is a special class status because they ‘were born that way’….they can’t help it….it is ‘normal for them’ and you had better not criticize it. You must accept it and soon accept how it will change all of society. I was just reading an article yesterday about the Feds planning soon to eliminate the words ‘he’ and ‘she’ from their communications and signage. Those words are becoming discriminatory as we closer to becoming a gender neutral society…all because some people think they were ‘born that way’, not knowing for sure what sex they are.

        So, yes, this story does relate. This girl has a right to act like an idiot, go around wearing a tail, meowing, trying to catch mice (bet she won’t eat one!) and, I am sure no one will refer her to the psych ward for help. Why, what right have we to criticize her…she was just ‘born that way’….just like the transsexuals. And there was another lady who said was born to be blind…she just feels it. So a doctor very ‘compassionately’ helped her become blind by pouring acid in her eyes. After all…it was her ‘right’!! Who are we to question her sanity? We just affirm her in her madness because nothing can be wrong today. There is no absolute truth today… only personal truth. And that is why we are seeing such lunacy and that is why, yes, there IS a comparison.

        • TheKingOfRhye

          “Transgenders wants us to believe they were just born attracted to both sexes”???

          Whoa, hold on right there. Transgender does not mean attracted to both sexes. Where did you even get that idea? The word for that would be bisexual. Which transgender people might or might not be. Being transgender has nothing to do with what sex you are attracted to.

          And the whole idea, like you said, that they are “not knowing for sure what sex they are”…..for one thing, it’s gender, not sex, here. They’re not the same thing. And pretty much all transgender people I’ve ever even heard of were pretty sure, from an early age, that their gender didn’t match their biological sex. And also, most of them don’t want to be “gender neutral”, either. Do you think someone born male, that wears makeup and women’s clothes, and changes their name to a female name is trying to be “gender neutral”? It’s most likely that person’s goal to be called “she” or “her”.

          • afchief

            There is no such thing as transgender. It is another word for homosexual and mental illness, period!!! If someone believes he is a dolphin, would you call him Flipper and throw him mackerel? Because he is not a dolphin and fantasizing that he is does not make it so. Same goes if he fantasized that he is a woman. He is not. It is a sickness!!!

          • TheKingOfRhye

            “It is another word for homosexual”

            OK, then, so let’s consider two hypothetical people.

            1. A man, attracted to men, has a sex change, and continues to be attracted to men.
            2. A man, attracted to women, has a sex change, and continues to be attracted to women.

            Which one is homosexual? #1? #2? Both?

            And you might want to take that up with Angel there, she seems to think it’s another word for bisexual, for some reason….

          • afchief

            The skin and bones anorexic girl that stands in front of the mirror and sees herself as fat…do we cater to her self-deception and encourage her to eat less? Of course not. Instead, we call it what it is, a disorder, and seek ways to change the behavior for the child’s own well being and safety. Why don’t we do the same with our confused transgendered lot?

          • TheKingOfRhye

            So you can’t answer my question, or just won’t?

          • afchief

            They both have a mental illness and one is a homo.

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Oh, I see…….so they are clearly both transgender…..transsexual in that case as well…..but only one is a “homo”? Hmm…..

          • Jolanda Tiellemans

            As always no straight answer from our copy-paste champion.

          • gogo0

            afchief preaches hated for anyone that he disagrees with, very un-Jesus like. he only knows hate, and thats not useful for debate

          • Angel Jabbins

            Just common sense, isn’t it, chief? But common sense is not so common today. We don’t help people overcome these mental problems anymore. Instead we affirm them in their sicknesses, call them normal in the name of tolerance, and force it all on the rest of society. Why? Because we can’t say anything is wrong. The idea of absolute truth is abhorrent. Everyone wants to define their own individual truth and the result is the mess we have today. Am I surprise a girl thinks she should have been born a cat? Sadly nothing surprises me anymore….

          • Ambulance Chaser

            We don’t help people overcome their mental problems? So there are no such things as psychologists, psychiatrists, or LCSW’s? There are no such things as antipsychotic medications? There are no college majors in psychology and counseling? These things are all figments of my imagination?

            I should go back and tell my undergrad Psych 111 professor that he doesn’t exist. He’ll be heartbroken.

          • Balerion

            If afchief took his meds then Angel Jabbins would cease to be.

          • afchief

            So true Angel!! There is nothing normal about any of these lifestyles. The Word of God is so true about these people (Romans 1:18-28)

            We are definitely in the last days.

          • BobRumba

            No actually, the “Word of God” says nothing about them.

          • afchief

            It sure does. The Bible contains 9 specific references to homosexuality: 4 in the Old Testament (Genesis 19:1-25; Judges 19:22-30; Leviticus 18:22; Leviticus 20:13) and 5 in the New Testament (Romans 1:24-28; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11; 1 Timothy 1:8-11; 2 Peter 2:6-10; Jude 1:7). The passage in Romans, in particular is so clear that it seems to have been written by St. Paul in anticipation that people might challenge the idea that homosexual behavior is wrong (in case you don’t get it, let me make it perfectly clear!). In addition, there are numerous other passages that touch on this topic indirectly through comments on the biblical view of marriage and family, promiscuity, and sexual purity. Included in these references are Genesis 2:18-25; Proverbs 18:22; Mark 7:21; 1 Thessalonians 4:3-5; Romans 6:13; Romans 13:13; 1 Corinthians 6:13; 1 Corinthians 6:18-19; Galatians 5:19-21; Ephesians 5:3; Colossians 3:5; Revelation 21:8; Revelation 22:15.

            Homosexual behavior is always discussed in the Bible as a serious sin. It is usually not singled out, but listed among other particularly heinous sins as examples of how depraved one can become. It is discussed in the context of idolatry. Idolatry is a most serious offense against God, and its seriousness helps explain why homosexual behavior was a capital offense in the Old Testament. Historical Christian interpretation has consistently viewed homosexual behavior as sinful. The modern word sodomy even comes from the biblical account of Sodom and Gomorrah.

            It should be pointed out that what the Bible condemns is not personality traits such as feminine feelings on the part of a man (or masculine feelings on the part of a woman). However, Jesus taught that sin runs deep. He said, “I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28; compare Mark 7:15-23). But notice the statement in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11: “such were some of you.” This seems a clear indication that homosexuals can change. While our basest instincts of many sorts are difficult to control, we are not like animals in the forest; we can overcome our temptations to become blameless in God’s sight (Philippians 2:15; Colossians 1:22; 1 Thessalonians 4:3-8; 1 Timothy 3:1-13, 5:7, 6:14; Titus 1:6; 1 John 3:4-10).

            There are those who take some of the passages of Scripture above and attempt to show that they do not really mean to condemn homosexuality. But these arguments fall short, and upon investigation become an obvious ploy to distort the plain meaning of Scripture. As applies to other doctrines of the Bible, one must avoid trying to interpret Scripture in light of one’s proclivities, and instead, interpret one’s proclivities in light of Scripture. The Bible is its own grid. It is wrong to overlay your own grid on the Bible. For a more detailed look at this, see Biblical Interpretation.

          • BobRumba

            I was talking about transgenders. Not mentioned in the Bible.

          • afchief

            It sure does! Transgender = homo

          • Balerion

            Seems you of all people should have some experience with this. You look in the mirror and see a genius staring back, while everyone else who looks at you sees an imbecile.

            Oh wait, that would actually require some degree of self-awareness.

          • Angel Jabbins

            Both are sick….just sick! God help us that we can’t see it today.

          • BobRumba

            Sick is a sick word to use.

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            Transgender means a person feels that they are inwardly the opposite gender of what they are on the outside. That’s it. It’s got precisely NOTHING to do with sexuality or attraction, and most people don’t know enough about it (myself and yourself included) to make a statement about it being a mental illness. You are neither God nor a scientist.

          • afchief

            Transgender means mental sickness!!!

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            That is your opinion and nothing more.

          • afchief

            It’s a fact!!!

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            It is your opinion, and not a particularly well-informed one.

          • afchief

            Sorry Oshtur, but it is FACT!!!!

            There Is No Such Thing as ‘Transgendered’

            By Tom Trinko

            Conservatives win when people have the truth, because modern liberal causes are always built on lies.

            When conservatives buy into the lie, we lose. For example, gay marriage is culturally accepted, in part, because for 30 years conservatives have been unwilling, out of misplaced sympathy, to correctly describe the gay lifestyle.

            Sexually active gays are essentially never monogamous, die young due to diseases they get from their promiscuous lifestyle, are depressed and despondent, are likely to use drugs, and are fixated on sex, not love. Being a sexually active gay is worse for one’s health than being a smoker.

            Yet conservatives generally haven’t objected to the lie that gays are just like heterosexuals. But once one agrees to that, it’s really hard to explain to low-information voters why gays don’t make great parents and shouldn’t be allowed to marry. On the other hand, conservatives have been constantly pointing out the lies of the climate alarmists, and as a result, the average American couldn’t care less about climate change. Given the truth, the vast majority of people will pick the conservative position most of the time.

            The latest round in liberals’ assault on Judeo-Christian morality is their demented desire to normalize insanity – namely that one’s sex is merely a matter of what one wants it to be. As usual, their position is based on the totally false claim that a person’s sex is not biological, but psychological.

            Christians, whom liberals constantly label as “anti-science,” have no problem realizing that DNA defines our biological identity but not who we are. Yet modern liberals reject settled science and claim that someone with a woman’s DNA can really be biologically male.

            The reality is that the only time a man is trapped in a woman’s body is before he’s born. Similarly, a man can no more will himself to be a woman than he can will himself to be Napoleon – a side-effect of this thing called reality.

            Now, men and women can suffer from gender identity confusion, but while we should strive to help those who think they’re something they’re not, the right way to do so is not to enable their delusions. If an Elvis impersonator suddenly declared that he was Elvis, no sane person would think that the loving response would be to start calling him The King.

            Showing true love to people who identify as transgendered is helping them love who they really are, not telling them that they have to change because they’re not good as they are.

            Sadly, there are signs that some conservatives are buying into the liberals’ false narrative. You might have seen conservative sites that said that the Houston “anti-discrimination” law didn’t pass. This is a bit of terminology that buys into the transgender lie. Letting biological men who simply say they think they’re women into women’s restrooms is not anti-discrimination; it’s pro-discrimination against women. Does the phrase “sexual harassment” ring a bell?

            Similarly, conservatives use the term LGBT as though it were a valid description of biological diversity rather than a purely psychological construct, developed by psychiatrists who tend to self-identify as members of the LGBT “community.”

            Like all other groups, the “transgendered” are viewed by liberals in terms of how they can be used to further the expansion of liberal power and control. If liberals really cared about the “transgendered,” they’d be helping those suffering from gender identity confusion accept who they truly are. Instead, liberals support the “transgender” cause because it’s a direct repudiation of the Judeo-Christian view that men are not gods and that men and women have a biological identity they can’t change. Additionally, by supporting the “transgender” cause, liberals attack the Judeo-Christian view that sex is about more than recreation and is intended to be between a man and a woman.

            Some conservatives feel bad about condemning the “transgender” lifestyle because they think that’s not compassionate. That’s a result of another liberal lie: the lie that saying that a person’s lifestyle isn’t good for him is an attack on the person. Liberals clearly don’t believe that, since they have no problem attacking smokers’ and overweight people’s lifestyles. However, it’s a convenient bit of intellectual octopus ink to muddy the waters and deflect the train of thought of people who aren’t very analytical.

            The reality is that it’s not cruel or unloving to point out the reality of the “transgendered” any more than it’s uncaring to describe the disaster that is the gay lifestyle. What kind person would purposely lie to a smoker about the health consequences of smoking? Yet if we lie about what being “transgendered” or gay really means, we’re lying to people confused about their sexuality about the consequences of their choices.

            Even worse, by buying into the “transgender” lie, we’re directly supporting discrimination against sane people. When a man wants to be in a women’s locker room because he claims he thinks he’s a woman, one of two things is true:

            He’s lying, because he’s a pervert who’s pretending. This may be more common among teens than one might think, since saying one identifies as a woman does not require one to dress or act like a woman, much less mutilate oneself.

            He actually thinks he’s something he’s not, which means he’s not really mentally stable.

            In the former case, supporting the “transgender” cause is synonymous with supporting sexual harassment. It’s amazing that the same women who decry “micro-aggressions” by men and who say that a woman can decide days after having sex with a man that she was raped believe that making a teenage girl shower with a boy is just fine.

            In the latter case, allowing a testosterone-powered boy to compete with women in sports is unfair to women. Additionally, many young girls will be emotionally disturbed by the fact that even though this guy claims to be a gal, it’s visually obvious that he isn’t when he looks at them in the shower.

            While liberals claim to worship at the altar of the nonexistent “privacy” clause found in the penumbra of the emanations of the Constitution, in this context, they appear to believe that young women have no right to privacy at all – unless, of course, they want to kill their unborn daughters.

            Once one strips away the liberal lies, the reality is that to properly live the love and compassion that comes so naturally to most Americans, one should not follow unscientific and disproven liberal dogma that one can changes one’s sex merely by willing it. Rather, one should help people suffering from delusions about what they are to become comfortable with reality.

            Once we get voters in general to realize that just as the most loving thing to do for a smoker is tell him that smoking is bad, the most loving thing to do for the “transgendered” is to point out that they can never become the other sex and that they are wonderful just the way they are. Then we’ll be able to block liberals’ attempts to force acceptance of the “transgendered” on Americans.

          • Jolanda Tiellemans

            Oh wow a biased article from a biased person. Didn’t see that one comming.

          • Jolanda Tiellemans

            The only time he has a well-informed opinion is when he can copy-paste it from a site.

          • Ambulance Chaser

            Oh look, he’s about to post one now.

          • Angel Jabbins

            Absolutely, Chief! It used to be categorized as a mental illness. But, in our ‘enlightened society’ today, we can’t call anything abnormal, immoral, or just down right WRONG headed-thinking. We have to approve of anybody and everything in an effort to be ‘tolerant’. What rot! And then they have a hard time with the comparison of the girl who thinks she is a cat. They can’t see it is the same thing exactly. We are letting people tell us they are what they ‘feel’ they are when biology and common sense says otherwise. Funny how these people love to use science to justify their unbelief in God, but, when it comes to the topic of LGBTXYZ…it all comes down to feelings since there is no science to back up any of hit.

          • afchief

            We Christians will ALWAYS call lifestyles like homosexuality, transgenders, bisexual, etc sin. These people have been given over to a reprobate mind and think there is nothing wrong with these lifestyles.

            However, they are without excuse, because deep down they KNOW it is wrong. Their hearts have become harden and callous to sin.

          • Angel Jabbins

            No matter what these folks call themselves or who they are attracted to, it is abnormal. Though they may have had their feelings since being a child…that does translate into ‘they were born that way’. Many things influence how people view themselves. There is no scientific evidence that people who feel they are another sex were born in the wrong body and need to transition. It is lunacy. And most who have transitioned have confessed later on that their transition did not make them happy, but only caused them greater problems.

            As to society becoming gender neutral, it doesn’t matter how the LGBT..XYZ folks regard their gender. Our society, in a misguided effort to try to be ‘tolerant’ of everybody according to what they ‘feel’, will eventually have to do away with terms like ‘he’ and ‘she’, ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ because those words might offend someone. It is already happening. Just as men’s and women’s bathrooms are soon to become a thing of the past. This new morality (lack of morality) affects all of society… because of what this tiny minority ‘feels’ they are. They are no different than ‘cat girl’ except that they have a powerful well funded lobby behind them.

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Abnormal? Well, yes. Considering it’s only a tiny minority of people that are transgender, I guess it is. I think even most trans people would agree they are not the norm. Why, though, is it like just being ‘abnormal’ is some kind of unforgivable sin? Your thing about the words he and she being gone and all the rest is just yet another ‘slippery slope’ argument.

          • Bob Johnson

            Abnormal is a statical concept, like being a blond is abnormal. There are between 800 and 1,000 sex reassignment surgeries preformed in the USA every year. It is also estimated that another 800 to 1,000 US citizens go overseas (mainly Thailand) because of lower cost.

            Only a very small number of these people make the news.

          • Angel Jabbins

            You might want to google Walt Heyer and read about what happened to him. He is a man who is now in his 70’s who had sex reassignment surgery and lived many years as a woman. He later had surgery to change back to being a man. He tells of the devastation his sex change caused for his family and himself. He has a blog called sexchangeregret. com

          • Angel Jabbins

            I am sorry to say that I have not expressed myself very well on this topic if I gave you the impression that being same sex attracted or feeling uncomfortable with one’s gender is an unforgiveable sin. (According to Scriptures, the only sin that is unforgiveable is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Every single sin and sinner…no matter what the sin…can be forgiven through Christ.) The feelings themselves are not what is sinful. It is acting upon the feelings and engaging in sexual behaviors that are sinful and self destructive. And society’s response today is sinful. Instead of giving these folks the help they need, the trend now is to affirm them in their abnormality, disorder…even to the point of now starting to outlaw reparative therapy. Why shouldn’t it be available to those who do want that kind of help? I have no animosity for people who are confused and conflicted in these matters. Just the opposite. Most often these are people who have suffered some kind of abuse or been subjected to a difficult upbringing, harsh parenting, etc. and there may even be some genetic predisposition to the feelings they are having. But they can be helped and help should be available.

            You might want to google Walt Heyer and read about what happened to him. He is a man who is now in his 70’s who had sex reassignment surgery and lived many years as a woman. He later had surgery to change back to being a man. He tells of the devastation his sex change caused for his family and himself. He has a blog called sexchangeregret. com.

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Maybe it was a poor choice of words on my part when I said
            “unforgivable sin”, but it just bugs me the way you’re using that word
            “abnormal”, like that in itself is some sort of transgression. Like
            being normal is something to aspire to?

            For every Walt Heyer you find, I could probably find a hundred stories of people who people who were perfectly happy after having a sex change, or even just living as the opposite gender.

          • gogo0

            against the majority of pizzas, a square pizza is abnormal. so is a chicken sandwich with a slice of dill pickle, kids with downs syndrome, chinese american football players, and people born via artificial insemination. where are the pitchforks for these ABNORMALS to get NORMAL already?

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Now I’m hungry for some square pizza and a chicken sandwich.

          • Angel Jabbins

            So much for having a rational discussion with grown ups.

          • gogo0

            whats irrational about it? the primary non-god reason presented against people being different is that it is abnormal. “abnormal” is not by default a pejorative, nor is it a very good argument

          • Angel Jabbins

            Merriam Webster: abnormal: “different from what is normal or average : unusual, especially in a way that causes problems”. Some synonyms given are: ‘unnatural’, ‘aberrant’, ‘deviant’, ‘deviate’. Sounds a little ‘pejorative’…ish to me.

            A man who claims he is a woman….who goes to the extreme of ingesting tons of hormones and mutilating his body in an futile attempt to become one…that sure sounds pretty abnormal, and is very sad. One can never become the opposite sex no matter how many hormones they ingest or what surgeries they may have. That man’s DNA still says he is a man.

          • BobRumba

            Abnormal? So what? Polyester is abnormal. Eyeglasses are abnormal. Is there any harm or damage being done? If not, then why concern yourself? You seem to have a real problem letting people live their lives for themselves.

            Society isn’t becoming “gender neutral”. Heterosexuals have always been the vast majority and always will. The thing is, you don’t take the ones who aren’t and call them abnormal and tell them they’re wicked and evil and bad. You make some semblance of an effort to understand them. A little empathy goes a long way.

          • Angel Jabbins

            It is not empathy to affirm someone in a life style that leads to self destruction. Just visit the CDC website and read the facts on the serious health risks associated with same sex practices. (And if these same things are done by heteroes….yes, they are at risk too…because I am sure that will be your next come back…’heteroes do it too’. Doesn’t make it morally right or healthy for anyone.)

            As to our society not becoming gender neutral, tell yourself that when all the bathrooms become same gender because it is discriminatory to keep someone out because of their sexual preference. See how that works for ya.

          • BobRumba

            It doesn’t lead to self destruction. How ridiculous. You are attempting to define someone’s relationship based on their sexual practices which is just ridiculous. As long as people are healthy and monogamous (or practicing safe sex if they aren’t) then it’s fine, and what’s more, none of anyone else’s business. Funny how you focus so much on the sex lives of LGBT people and never on the relationship itself.

            I grew up using a unisex bathroom as I’m sure most people did. It never did me any harm.

        • Josey

          You hit the nail on the head again.

        • BobRumba

          So how are you in any position to know whether a transgendered person is lying? I don’t know how many transgendered people are on this planet, but I’m guessing it’s quite a few. Are they all nuts? Liars? Do we ostracize them or tell them they need Jesus or do something else we aren’t qualified to do because we don’t know their situation and aren’t in their situation?

          Now tell me how many people on this planet believe themselves to be cats or other animals. NOW are we in a position to suggest they are nuts or liars or attention-starved? Why yes, I believe we are.

          • Jolanda Tiellemans

            Don’t you know? Some people around here are mind readers. They know exactly what someone is thinking, if someone is lying, etc.

          • BobRumba

            There is just this really prevalent attitude with some people that you fix things you don’t understand or scare you or make you uncomfortable in any way with a good solid dose of Jesus, and real life doesn’t work that way.

          • Angel Jabbins

            We do harm to people when we affirm them in a lifestyle that brings nothing but heartache….and which will lead ultimately to eternal damnation. (I will get blasted for that, but it is the truth.) A person who feels they were supposed to another sex needs help, counseling, and to be led to faith in Christ who has the power to change them. He may not change how they feel about themselves but He may…He can do that, but doesn’t always take away the obstacles we face in life. He may help them, in spite of their feelings, to live a victorious holy life for Him. We are not put on this earth to live for ourselves, to please ourselves. That is a mistaken view most people have. God put us here for one reason only: to give Him glory. He has given us His commandments on how we are to live. He gave His own Son to die for our sins so we can be forgiven, give our lives to God. And then He gives those who trust in Christ, His Holy Spirit to help them live in a way that gives Him glory. When a transsexual or homosexual person gets truly saved, their main concern is no longer how to please themselves. Their desire becomes how to please God and He either will heal them completely of their feelings or give them the grace to live in obedience to Him in spite of their feelings.

          • Jolanda Tiellemans

            They don’t need help, just being accepted for who they are. Simple.

          • BobRumba

            So that puts you in the position of teacher and the rest of us in the position of student, and I don’t think you are in any position to school people on that. This “lifestyle” you bitterly complain about works just fine for lots of people, and because you are not in their shoes you simply can’t speak on their behalf.

            And whenever I hear anybody use expressions like “truly saved” I know I’m dealing with hardcore evangelicals who believe their version of Christianity and theirs alone is the only one that is correct. If you want to believe that, fine, but even IF by your definition a homosexual person is “saved”, they are still homosexual and always will be.

      • Concern

        It is a legit comparison, since the LGBT community has invoke “equal rights” ; considering their case a civil rights issue. The Science behind the LGBT is highly debatable, with many professional disagreeing with each other. But , who can deny Bruce Jenner His Right to be a “woman”
        Do you have a problem with other types of “Trans….” needing the right to be as they “feel”?….

        • TheKingOfRhye

          Science behind LGBT is debatable? Maybe on the finer points of it, like if someone’s sexual orientation is hereditary, environmental, or some combination of those. There is pretty much a general consensus on much of the way sexuality works, though. As for people like that ‘cat lady’….. OK, I think she’s a little nutty, but hey, if she’s not breaking any laws, if she can function like a normal human when need be….what’s the harm?

          • Concern

            “OK, I think she’s a little nutty, but hey, if she’s not breaking any laws, if she can function like a normal human when need be….what’s the harm?” and many others also think the same of people like Bruce Jenner….. Can you appreciate that?

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Yes I can. But a lot of people here are saying a lot more than that, aren’t they? They’re not just saying trans people are a “little nutty”, they’re saying they’re sick, mentally ill, confused, sinful, etc, etc….

            And it’s Caitlyn now, anyway.

          • Concern

            For me and his mother, it’s Bruce; not Caitlyn.
            btw, do you know if he cut off the pecker yet? I heard he plan to do so this January.
            Trans people and homosexuality was considered a “mental illness” until the mid 70’s when gays and lesbians began to be a cultural force with growing political clout.

          • TheKingOfRhye

            I really don’t know, I haven’t been following Caitlyn’s surgical procedures or lack thereof, I really don’t give a damn one way or the other.

            Your last sentence is basically true….and that’s a good thing.

    • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

      It is a slippery slope story suggesting that if a person says they are a cat and we don’t take them seriously that we ought to do the same with transgendered people. I obviously disagree.

      • gizmo23

        I thought about the furry thing also

  • The Last Trump

    It was just a matter of time…
    Shouldn’t be too long until the liberal extremist thought and speech police show up, demanding that we, of course, accept her as such. God forbid they label us as hateful and intolerant bigots!

    “I’ve been a cat all my life…I realized I was a cat when I was 16” 🙂
    Hmmm. Gee, do you think cats KNOW that they are cats?…

    “It’s obvious I’m a cat when I start purring and meowing and walking around on four legs”
    Uh huh. Well, that’s good enough for me. I’m convinced!
    Wonder why she bothers with all the warm clothes though…

    • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

      So one wacko who thinks she’s a cat is somehow comparable to the very real issue of transgenderism? Or is it homosexuals you are hating on, I’m not really clear…

      • The Last Trump

        You didn’t notice the similarity between this person believing that she is something that she biologically is not, with other people who also believe that they are something they biologically are not?
        Go figure.

        • Becky

          Spot. On.

        • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

          No, I guess I lost you when you tried to make the comparison but were no longer talking about the same species.

          • The Last Trump

            Oh. So as long as it’s the same species, something can be what it is clearly not, huh?
            Suuuure. Makes perfect sense. (!)
            Hee, hee! Glad to have you back Val!
            Shall we start the timer, Muffin? Ahhh, you just never learn do you?.
            Any news from fstdt dot com, Poogs? 😉

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            Here is something for you to consider.

            Somewhere, there is someone named Val/Muffin/Poogs who might be reading this message thread thinking YOU are thinking that someone else is them, and they are probably laughing really hard at you right now.

            I checked out the site you mentioned. Wow. You aren’t too popular over there. I wonder why.

          • The Last Trump

            We’ve missed you terribly Val. This place just wasn’t as funny, I mean, the same without you. Good to have you back Muffin!
            It’s very important to us that you post and do so often. Even if its as BobRumba too! Nothing turns people away from liberal extremism and straight into the loving arms of Jesus and His Christian fundamentalist teachings faster than actually hearing one of you speak!
            Keep up the good work!

            And, “I checked out the site you mentioned” ! 🙂
            Hee, hee! Too cute Muffin! Too cute!
            Best of luck with your new profiles Poogs!
            Tick tock, tick tock… 😉

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            LOL
            What’s the running count of “Vals” out there now? Gotta be up in the triple digits now. And what’s this, someone else too?
            Everyone’s favourite end times paranoid schizophrenic is back, ladies and germs. Isn’t he great?

          • Ben_Gonsalves

            Oh, oh, me, me! Me too! Can I be a “Val” as well?
            Can I join the club, will you call me “Poogs” and “Muffin” and say “hee hee” to me and unleash all your crazy on me?

          • The Last Trump

            Wow! A whole 8 comments so far, eh?
            Welcome to the Christian News Network.
            “Ben”
            Hee, hee! “Can I be Val as well”!!?? 🙂
            Adorable Muffin!
            How many other profiles from Crazy Town can we expect?
            You little schizo, you!
            Don’t forget to say hi to WGC too! He’s gonna love this!

          • Ben_Gonsalves

            That’s right, o paranoid one, I have used my account to read and not to comment. That changed when I saw what a horse’s you know what you were being to people. Is the Mighty Valri so mighty that she can create accounts retroactively? Don’t you think if I was some kind of sock account I would have addressed you ages ago?

            I’ll let Ben answer for himself, but if he’s anything like me, he isn’t going to care what you think. Although I’m sure lots of people here are chortling to themselves that there’s a guy on the forum so paranoid that he thinks there are 500 Valris coming to haunt his dreams. She must have really gotten to you, bless her heart.

          • The Last Trump

            Valri you say? “Valri”?
            Hmmm. Now who’s been saying “Valri”, Val?
            Hee, hee! Adorable!
            Not the brightest little bulb in the set, eh?
            And YOU will let “Ben” answer for himself!? “If he’s anything like ME, he….”??
            Huh? Did we already forget that you ARE Ben, “Ben”!!
            🙂 Oh brother! What a riot Val!
            Keep posting, you who are not “Valri”! Might wanna edit that last one though, ya think?
            (This juggling of multiple profiles can be tricky huh, Muffin! Hee, hee! 🙂

          • Ben_Gonsalves

            It was a joke, doofus. Anyone can see that. I’ve also referred to myself as Valri. Sailed clear over your head. Why am I not surprised?

            This is Ben, still answering for himself…Goodnight o paranoid one.

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            Yes, “Ben” just contacted me too. “It’s just “terrible” how you treated Val, sniff, sniff, sob, sob.” 🙂

          • The Last Trump

            You should have seen Ben’s last post to me.
            He defended Val (of course) and spoke of himself accidentally in the third person as she forgot she was posting as Ben! Too funny!
            I recommended she maybe edit that post! 🙂

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            Haha! Yes, Val will edit it, then delete it, then make up something we didn’t say and post it on her “famous” website that only 3 people have ever viewed – all personalities of Val. 🙂

            I think she banned herself just so she could get sympathy from her other personalities, hehe. 🙂

          • The Last Trump

            Ha ha!
            That was close….almost spit out my coffee there!
            Yes, they do tend to lean towards the Val worship don’t they?… And they don’t seem to like us very much…AND they submit posts to fstdt dot com!
            What on earth are the odds! 🙂

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            Actually, I have seen some of Val’s personalities actually fight to keep Val from emerging from the subconscious. Even some of them hate her! It is quite common with multiple personality disorder.

            Look for Val to now start having one personality fight with another. Go for it, Val – if you are reading this. (And we know you are, don’t we? :-))

          • The Last Trump

            Ahh, YOU’RE terrible!
            And I love it! 🙂

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            I miss the old Val, Trump. You know, the Val who stalked us and called us hateful names while claiming she was rooting out hate and intolerance. 🙂

          • Ben_Gonsalves

            I don’t know Val so I can’t defend her. But if she’s driven you to this tizzy I’ll admit a certain amount of admiration, Muffin. I spoke of myself accidentally in the third person? Or maybe you just have a problem (to say the least)?

          • The Last Trump

            Yes, these three “men” sure seem to be attracted to her brand of hate.
            So weird… 🙂

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            I always thought that “she” was a “he” to begin with. I am beginning to think “she” is a cat. 🙂

          • Ben_Gonsalves

            “Ben_Gonsalves – joined Feb. 1, 2012”
            Yup, all you have to do is click on my profile and that’s what you can read with your two beady, paranoid little eyes, my friend. Almost four whole years ago to the day. That’s a fairly long incubation period for “Val,” isn’t it?
            And what’s “tick tock, tick tock?” How long before your brain explodes from hate and/or paranoid rage?

          • The Last Trump

            You’re trying too hard Val.
            Take it down a notch. And maybe don’t troll everyone who’s ever posted about Val.
            Just sayin’.

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            It’s so heartwarming to watch you try to take all the attention off yourself when you’re posting your hatred and conspiracy theory blather. Can I just say I’m Valri, Ben, Bob, Jim, Mike, Arthur, Horace, Jeffrey, Bill, Hank and Frank as well?

            We’ve all got one thing in common actually. We all burst into laughter when you Poog and when you Muffin. You know, there are some people (not me of course) who would say you’re trying just a little TOO hard.

          • The Last Trump

            Good to have you back Muffin!
            What’s truly heartwarming is watching you desperately try to convince everybody that it’s not really YOU!
            You know, there are some people (not me of course) who would say you’re trying just a little TOO hard. 😉

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            Haha – yes, Val has many multiple personalities all over again!!! You caught it a little before I did – good show, Trump!

            I think there are about 2 pro-aborts on CNN – with about 20 baby sacrificing personalities. 🙂

            What is your favorite flavor of Muffin?

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            No one cares, Rumpy. I’ll be anyone you want me to be. Call me Valri for the rest of your life. If there were 500 million sock accounts it wouldn’t stop you from being nominated for Fundie of the Year because of your fear of the transgenders, gays, liberals, blacks, etc. And that goes for your Crazy friend too…he knows who he is.

          • The Last Trump

            Do you ever consider that you may actually need counselling of some kind?
            I mean, does continually stalking a Christian website with multiple profiles sound healthy to you, Muffin?

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            Got anything relevant to say regarding this thread, Trump? You know for all your talk about banning you certainly walk a fine line yourself. I wonder if anyone else here can speak to your multi-user paranoia. I doubt it though, because I can’t think of a single reason anyone would care.

          • The Last Trump

            “Got anything relevant”?
            Huh?
            See above, forgetful one.
            You stalked me. After I commented on this thread. Remember?
            Hee, hee! Adorable Muffin!

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            Oh! Right, of course, after you made your sweeping generalization about transgenders. That was so cute. Can you say something like that again?

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            We saw a lot of Val’s personalities emerge over on LAN too – until they all got their butts kicked. 🙂

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            Should we alert CNN that Val is back in town? 🙂

          • Ben_Gonsalves

            Hey, I understand you’re me. The Last Trump said so, so it must be true. Pleased to meet me, Me.

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            You’re not me, you’re Valri! Don’t lie!
            Oh, wait a sec…or is it ME who’s Valri? I’m all confused. 🙂
            If you DO know who Valri is, be sure to let her know we’re both her, I’m sure she will be interested.

          • Ben_Gonsalves

            I thought I was Valri. Damn.
            Let’s ask Trump, he seems to know everyone, even the ones who don’t want to know him.
            Well it was nice talking to Me, bye Valri. I mean Poogs. I mean me.

          • BobRumba

            “So as long as it’s the same species, something can be what it is clearly not, huh?”

            I wouldn’t have thought so before but after reading your stuff I realize you probably CAN be something other than a human being stuffed in a human body, because some of your posts are positively inhuman.

            Also I don’t know what you’re “hee heeing” about. Are you up for some smugness award or something?

          • The Last Trump

            Welcome to the Christian News Network.
            “Bob”.
            😉

          • BobRumba

            Everyone is always someone else back from the dead to haunt you, isn’t it?
            Question: Why should I care?

          • BobRumba

            You can do better than that. I want something submit-worthy, Muffin.

          • The Last Trump

            You must be talking about fstdt “Bob”.
            WHAT AN AMAZING COINCIDENCE!
            Hee, hee!
            Missed you, Muffin! 🙂

          • BobRumba

            Given how many fans you have, I am surprised you think there is only one single person who’d be taking you to task for the many baffling things you say. My money’s on you to take the prize, though, don’t worry. David J. Stewart doesn’t stand a chance – he’s positively normal compared to you.

          • The Last Trump

            Aww, thanks Val!

          • BobRumba

            The joke’s on you Trumpy. Suppose you get your wish and everyone is against you and we’re all the big bad Valri. Well then we all came back with brand new accounts didn’t we? And now you’ve got three Valris whereas yesterday there was only one!

            This is, of course, just entertaining your paranoid fantasies. No one would go to the trouble to make extra accounts to annoy you when we can do that just fine with one. As I’m managing to do now.

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            You smoked them out, Trump!

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            On a plus note, Val thinks that babies in the womb are different species too. But, not until 5 minutes after the kitty abortion.

          • The Last Trump

            And that all 60 million plus abortion cases are all somehow rape related.
            But other than THAT, she’s 100% pro life all the way!
            As are Ben, Bob and Blah I would rightly assume…

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            Well, Val’s “science-y” definition of when life would have begun is 5 minutes after the abortion has been completed. She got that from some guy no one has ever heard of on RationalWiki – in other words, the opinion of some apparent drug addict was her definition of “peer-reviewed” research.

          • The Last Trump

            I wonder if having multiple personalities accompanied by multiple user profiles that are all in complete agreement with “you” (?) qualifies as “peer reviewed” for Valster?

          • WorldGoneCrazy

            She tries to throw us off by not always up-voting her other personalities. 🙂

          • BobRumba

            RationalWiki is a great website. Authoritative and thorough.

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            There’s nothing wrong with RationalWiki.

        • acontraryview

          Oh yes, comparing gender to species is SOOOOOOO similar. I can’t imagine how anyone could miss the significant similarities.

    • Becky

      Lol. She’s a bit bonkers.

    • bowie1

      Pretty hard to change her into a cat species if that’s what she would want! The whole story almost sounds like a hoax…

    • BobRumba

      Yeah, it was just a matter of time before someone said “It was just a matter of time” trying to make this into the ridiculous slippery slope argument it is.

      It’s one person. And you’re going to be extremely hard pressed to find ANYBODY who’s going to demand we accept her for thinking she’s a cat. If I were a betting man I’d lay 1000 to 1 odds on it.

      • Concern

        Cultural changes usually start small…look at the Feminist movement, and abortion, and then look at the LGBT community. They started small and grew.
        The Slippery Slope isn’t all that ridiculous from that perspective. This is another notch on that slope. And how dare you stop her or any one, who feel they right to be what they want and feel is infringed on.

        “And you’re going to be extremely hard pressed to find ANYBODY who’s going to demand we accept her for thinking she’s a cat” she is a community of one, just like the LGBT Community, they weren’t always this influential, with political clout.
        It took time.
        This ,like any other will be an “equal rights” issue. Her rights to be a cat.

  • The Guest

    Given over to a delusional and reprobate mind. I would blame the poor girl, but it is obvious she is mentally incapacitated and that this world with all its “anything goes” indoctrinations, where you can choose what gender/species you want to be, is just exacerbating it. It’s Romans 1 in a nutshell. Welcome to the Last Days.

    • Amos Moses

      So if someone identifies as a deer, is it open season during deer season?

      • Concern

        I guess who can shoot it…it is a deer.

  • Chrissy Vee

    (o_O)

  • Tony Holmquist

    Average life span of a cat: 15 years. Hate to tell you this, Kattedame, but by the time you discovered you were feline, you were dead. You are a dead cat…

    • Chrissy Vee

      Yikes! hahaha

    • Faithwalker

      hahah!! funny…

  • Reason2012

    Just shows you the ridiculous conclusion of rejecting biological scientific fact that you’re a male, female and pretend your feelings trump biology – what’s to stop people from claiming to be anything they want if they “feel” like it? Nothing.

    • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

      No, because a cat is a different species. Transgenderism is real.

      • Reason2012

        So when it comes to species we don’t ignore genetics but when it comes to other things we claim feelings trump genetics? How so? This woman claims she’s a cat – are you a bigot to tell her otherwise? You must have a phobia… (?)

        • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

          Gender.
          Species.
          Two very different things. You can look them up if you want to but for your sake I hope you don’t HAVE to.

          • Reason2012

            Both biological facts. One can be ignored because of feelings and the other cannot? How so?
            Are you a bigot to tell her otherwise?
            Do you have a phobia?

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            You can tell her she’s not a cat by showing her a picture of her skeleton and a picture of a cat’s skeleton.
            As for what species she BELIEVES herself to be, I’m confident that psychologists will tell her that she needs a nice quiet room and some medication. Because she’s got no basis to believe she’s anything other than a human being.

          • Reason2012

            You can tell a person’s a male by showing him pictures of males and a picture of male genitals.

            As for what gender a person BELIEVES himself to be, most are also confident psychologists without an agenda can tell him that he needs a nice quiet room and some medication if he think’s he’s a woman. Because he’s got not basis to believe he’s anything other than a male.

            Or perhaps the response should be: you’re a transspeciesphobe and a bigot (?)

          • Ambulance Chaser

            Oh? Which medication would you like to prescribe? In what dose? What will the results likely be?

          • afchief

            The Gos….pill. It saves every time!!!!

          • Bob Johnson

            One glass white wine just before her kitty nap time.

          • Ambulance Chaser

            I wish I could upvote this a hundred times.

  • Shaun D.

    Some people (AKA: Idiots), will do anything for attention.

    It’s nothing new.

    Should remind her that cats don’t speak human.

    Ooooops.

  • Psychdude1

    A new addition to multiculturalism

  • disqus_SUijHfDO8w

    Wow wow wow ha ha ha ha meeeeoooowwww. Definitely keep this woman up in prayer it is definitely some sort of delusional disorder. I really hope that this doesn’t become the next trend. note: keep all people who think they are birds away from tall buildings, cliffs, and other high places.

  • disqus_SUijHfDO8w

    With all due seriousness she needs professional help and prayer. I wish the best for her and hope she finds Christ.

    • Josey

      I agree with you, this is something a 3 yr old would do and then outgrow, she definitely needs Christ to heal and deliver her.

      • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

        No, actually, she can overcome this little attention-getting delusion of hers without Christ and do it perfectly well.

  • archaeologist

    Cats can’t talk or think so how would it know it was trapped in the wrong species?

    • Levente Varga

      Of course they can, they surely do!

  • Becky

    Alleged reporter: “What is cat language for ‘come on let’s go'”?

    Alleged cat: “Uuuuuuuuhhhhh…meow, meow, meow!”

    Alleged reporter: “Ha! And, you understand it?”

    Alleged bff: “I understand.”

    First off, my side is killing me…laughed way too hard. Second, this isn’t true…my cat just sat there.

  • ricknick59

    Funny, I am a rich man, trapped in a poor man’s body! Is there some kind of federal funding for that! I am sure I am being discriminated against because my bank keeps saying there is nothing in my account!

  • John_33

    Sadly, this delusion is becoming more common as the idea that you can be whatever you want is becoming more popular. With BIID, Clinical vampirism, transspecies, and transracialism, the world is going insane, but is this that much different from transgenderism? They too insist that they were born in the wrong body simply because of how they perceive themselves. Don’t misunderstand, some of these people desperately need our help and compassion, but supporting delusion is not the right answer.

    • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

      No, it’s not becoming more common at all. There is likely no one else on earth doing what she is doing and it’s not comparable to transgenderism.

      • John_33

        Really? With all of the examples I cited, how can you say that this is not becoming more common? And with gender, Facebook has come up with over 50 different genders (and an extra option for “other” in case those terms don’t fit) and with NPR discussing how the young generation is coming up with new genders and change them by the hour, including the new gender “tractor.” News article after news article establishes these growing trends. I beg to differ.

        • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

          Facebook can offer people all the gender preferences it wants to. Ultimately there are only two. Man is one, woman is the other. Cat is not on the list, nor is vampire. You seem to be painting liberalism in a way that says “anything goes” but I don’t think you’re being fair about it, because going through what you list above, BIID is not medically recognized by the American Psychological Association, nor clinical vampirism, nor transspecies, nor transracialism. The world isn’t going insane, people can be as creative as they like but they don’t get to define these things, the medical profession does.

          • John_33

            I’m glad you recognize that there’re only two genders as many today do not, but what makes gender dysphoria any different from species dysphoria? The medical community draws many parallels between the two. As for BIID, it is starting to become accepted by some in the medical community as a real condition too. That’s why a woman recently was blinded by a doctor who “treated” her desire to lose her eyesight. A number of healthy people have received amputations and have expressed that they have felt much better since, but is that what we should be doing? Also, how different is that from gender reassignment surgery? The world is indeed going insane when you can be fined for “misgendering” an individual in New York – especially when they can change their gender by the hour!

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            We are human beings, and as we are contained in the skin of such, to be anything else is completely outside of anything we could experience outside of our own imaginations. Gender is not the same thing at all. All you really need to know is that there are many, many people in the world who feel they are transgendered. For that many people to be faking it or playing a game for attention is unlikely in the extreme. To make an educated statement about it you would have to study it and I know I haven’t done that and I suspect you haven’t either. I highly, highly doubt BIID is real and if it is it’s probably a treatable disorder. But who are you, and who am I, to tell someone who feels they are a woman trapped in a man’s body, or vice versa, that they aren’t?

          • John_33

            I absolutely agree with you that I don’t believe that everyone in the transgendered community is faking it. There are many who are confused about their gender or struggle with it, but here’s the problem: There’s no way for the medical community to tell who is transgendered and who is not, and because of that, transgenderism at its core is an identity rather than a medical condition.

            I agree with you that BIID is a disorder and is treatable, but why don’t we do the same for those who suffer with gender dysphoria? I really feel sorry for those who struggle with it, and I support giving them all the help they need, but to pretend that these people actually changed from a man to a woman or vice versa is not the answer. There are many ex-transgendered individuals who have found wholeness and peace after returning to the gender they were born with. The sad thing though is that numerous medical doctors were too quick to give them reassignment surgery before they found wholeness. What is the answer for these people? They need help, but what’s being done today is not the answer.

          • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

            “How do we know how to treat them then?”

            Seems straightforward enough to me. If they have the money, the inclination and the desire to have gender reassignment surgery, let them. Who are they hurting? (Apart from the themselves, temporarily.) Shouldn’t matter if they’re “faking” or not. I disagree that there’s no way for the medical community to tell. There is science and knowledge available on this issue.

            Anyway, if they have the surgery and end up regretting it, there’s no way for them to say they didn’t know what they were getting into. And once again, if they have the money/inclination/desire to change back, let them. Que sera sera. It’s not our place to stop them.

          • John_33

            But how is that any different than BIID? If people with BIID have the money and the inclination, then why can’t they get their leg removed or their eyes blinded? It’s the same thing in that regard. Tragically, there are no tests to tell if one is transgendered or not. You would think that there would be, but if there were, then it would catch those who are simply confused about their gender or those who lie. But there are no such tests.

          • BobRumba

            I don’t see why it’s anyone’s place to tell someone else they can’t have a sex change operation. If they end up regretting it afterwards they really have no one to blame but themselves.

          • John_33

            But would you say the same for people who suffer with BIID? Should we remove their leg or blind them and then say that they have nobody to blame but themselves if they regret it? That’s not right. Let’s offer real compassion and care for people who suffer and struggle with these issues.

  • Nidalap

    Hmm…this feels like more of a cry for attention than a true delusion…

    • acontraryview

      More like a meow for attention.

      • Nidalap

        Potato-meowto. (^_^)

        • acontraryview

          LOL

  • acontraryview

    While this story was pretty funny, I can’t imagine what it has to do with news “from a Christian standpoint”.

    • LePastieDeLaBourgeoisie

      I do. It is an attempt to make light of transgenderism by comparing it to someone believing herself to be trapped in the body of a cat (even though she’s likely the only person on earth to do this) . It’s a display of slippery slope “logic”. Right after the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage was legal, a story appeared here about a man who was petitioning to marry several women at once. Same idea.

      • acontraryview

        Oh. Grasping at straws. Got it.

  • ronald54321

    There’s money in this somewhere.

  • Edward Caffray

    She needs our prayers, not snarky comments

    • BobRumba

      Oh, she’s just looking for headlines.

      • gizmo23

        Do you know her? If not you have no idea what she is looking for

        • BobRumba

          I know she isn’t a “transspecies”.

        • BobRumba

          I think she should be ignored. She isn’t relevant to the transgender debate in any way.

  • Stephanie Cantrell

    Here are a few questions about which to think:
    1) Is she hurting anyone by living as a cat?
    2) Does this affect you and your “faith” in any way?

    If you answered no to both of these questions, then great! Have a good day.
    If you only answered no to number 2, then great! Have a good day.

    If she’s already receiving therapy as the article suggests, there is nothing that any negative comments can possibly do to help her… so great! Have a good day.

    If she’s trolling, then there isn’t anything about which to be concerned… so great! Have a good day.

    • Nidalap

      …Says the lady who feels compelled to comment at the Christian news site that isn’t harming her in any way…

      • Stephanie Cantrell

        Great! Have a good day!

  • BobRumba

    The mistake is giving people like this attention. She’s hardly the representative for a whole subculture of people who think they are cats, she is a lone voice looking for some attention.

    I think the brain of a cat is like the size of a walnut or something, so if she identifies or has an affinity for cats or even a fetish as has been suggested, fine, but she probably doesn’t want to identify with them as much as she THINKS she does.

  • Concern

    Maybe when enough people claim to be a “Cat” Psychologist will then take notice and affirm that, indeed she is a “cat” trap in a female body.
    This is another notch on the slipper slope since the LGBT movement. And who dare tell her she does not have the right to “feel” she is a Cat” …if Bruce Jenner is celebrated on TV and in the Culture, we should celebrate this Mentally ill person..

    • Nidalap

      Should they go with a people psychologist first, or just go straight to pet psychologist? 🙂

      • Concern

        The Psychologist will find them [ her] as soon as it becomes a trend with political clout. Then they will affirm that behavior as “born that way” …just like they affirm the LGBT behavior as “born that way”- a natural thing.

        • Nidalap

          Hmm…Species Dysphoria… a horrifying disorder wherein some part of the human brain is firing off in a manner consistent with an animals brain? Only ‘correctable’ through surgeries and cosmetic applications to mimic the animal perhaps?

  • Ken Faivor

    I guess the real test is if she actually eats the mouse raw when she finally does catch it. Likely she will rethink her status.

  • Celephais

    So hasn’t she figured out yet that cats don’t use human language? Why is she still talking? Really, you can’t satirize this stuff. Does she eat cat food? I bet not. So if people can choose their gender, age, race, and species, what’s next? People thinking they’re aliens? Rocks? The insanity of Political Correctness and relativism grows more wacko every day. It all started when people accepted the equally crazy idea that humans are descended from ape-like ancestors.

  • sammy13

    Nut job?

  • Rick

    Why is this article on here? Do you know how many people you can find like this? The editor needs to be reprimanded for this. Ridiculous.

    • BobRumba

      I think the intention is to compare her to transgenders.

  • Nidalap

    “Obama to ‘Celebrate Contributions of Muslim Americans’ at Maryland Mosque”- 18 comments

    “Maryland School District Sued Over Alleged ‘Islamic Indoctrination’”- 5 comments

    “Jury That Prosecuted Pro-Life Investigator Never Voted on Charging Planned Parenthood”- 21 comments

    “‘Born in the Wrong Species?’ Woman Claims She Is a Cat Trapped in a Human Body”- 142 comments

    Ha! Human nature, I suppose…

    • BobRumba

      Transgenderism is a hot-button issue. Doesn’t surprise me. That is obviously the comparison being made here.

      • Nidalap

        Don’t just automatically discount Species Dysphoria now! 🙂

  • George Jenkins

    Well, Norway has done one better than boys calling themselves girls and requiring that they be allowed to use girls’ washrooms. This Norwegian believes she is a cat. The article does not make it clear whether she considers herself a tom or a queen so i am not sure which bathroom contains the litter box. I wonder who cleans it.

  • http://www.bing.com/ Martin Smit

    My cat believes it is actually a small female human. It’s also wrong.

  • Listening2all

    Cartoon character Pokemon cat girls is her where she got her identity.

  • OldArkie

    We have many that do not want to be what God born them. They stand against our Wonderful God, doing their own things and never living for Him.

  • Peter Leh

    Teens are stupid in general. We all were. Hope she grows up and jettisons the attention.

  • Balerion

    I like most cats better than I like most humans anyway.

  • lizk

    God created man and woman and He made them perfect. Because of sin the devil, sin is in the world only God can break the chains of sin and delusions, and addictions