51 Families Sue Obama Administration for Forcing School District to Allow Boy in Girls’ Locker Room

Locker-compressedCHICAGO — The U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice have been sued by over 50 families for forcing a school district to allow a male student who identifies as female to use the girls’ locker room at his local high school.

“It’s a massive step backwards to force women to give up their inherent right to bodily privacy,” said Thomas More Society attorney Jocelyn Floyd in a statement. “To impose such a rule on still-developing teenage girls, as they’re already struggling with puberty’s changes on their bodies and social pressures to look a certain way, undermines their dignity and tells them that their rights don’t matter. This isn’t a message our schools should be sending to our girls.”

As previously reported, two years ago, an unidentified high school student within the Palatine-based Township High School District 211 requested to use the girls’ locker room at at William Fremd High School as he had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

But the district declined, citing the privacy concerns of the female students. It in turn offered a private location to change, but the student rejected the accommodation. He then contacted the American Civil Liberties Union, which filed a federal complaint with the Office of Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Education.

The Department of Education responded by opining that the district had to permit the student to use the locker room of his choice due to Title IX requirements. The two sides continued in talks for a number of months, but the district held firm on requiring privacy for female students while offering various options for the transgender student, which were refused.

It said that it desired to “to protect the privacy rights of all students when changing clothes or showering before or after physical education and after-school activities, while also providing accommodations necessary to meet the unique needs of individual students.”

The Department of Education recommended that the district install privacy curtains in the changing area so that he could not see other students changing and female students could not see him. The district installed the curtains, but as negotiations remained impasse, the department gave district officials 30 days to settle the matter under threat of penalty, including the possibility of the loss of $6 million in federal funding.

  • Connect with Christian News

The district soon voted to allow the accommodation for the student, but not without much objection from parents. Now, 51 families, representing 73 parents and 63 students, have sued the Obama administration over the matter, contending that it has unlawfully distorted and redefined the meaning of Title IX and is forcing its wrongful interpretation on school districts.

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits educational institutions from discriminating against a person based on their gender. It has generally been considered as applying to discrimination against women in treating females as inferior to males, including in sports programs.

“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance,” it reads.

“As the lawsuit explains, no law—including Title IX, the federal law concerning sex discrimination at schools and colleges that receive federal education funds—requires schools to allow boys into girls’ restrooms or girls into boys’ restrooms,” Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which is representing the families, said in a statement. “In fact, Title IX and its regulations specifically state that a school receiving federal funds can ‘provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex’ without putting that funding at risk.”

“Protecting students from inappropriate exposure to the opposite sex is not only perfectly legal, it’s a school district’s duty,” also said ADF Senior Counsel Jeremy Tedesco. “Allowing boys into girls’ locker rooms, a setting where girls are often partially or fully unclothed, is a blatant violation of student privacy. The school district should rescind its privacy-violating policies, and the court should order the Department of Education to stop bullying school districts with falsehoods about what federal law requires.”

As previously reported, the Department of Justice sent a letter to North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory on Wednesday, demanding that the state not enforce its new law requiring the use of government restrooms to be consistent with birth gender. It gave McCrory until Monday to capitulate.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • bowie1

    I can see some girls showering at home even it means they “smell” the rest of the school day.

    • Gal5:22-23

      Do a search, most kids don’t shower at schools anymore. Many schools don’t even offer towels.

      • Ken Faivor

        We brought our own towel from home and used it for a week straight alone with our gym cloths…….Talk about tolerance.

        • Gal5:22-23

          An article on line talks about that and how schools discourage it since a week old towel in a locker has a negative impact on everyone.

          • Ken Faivor

            I fully understand.

    • Josey

      I can see that too but the girls shouldn’t have to do that, I’d advise my grand daughter to carry cleansing wipes with her to at least sponge bath but they still have to change their clothes. I wonder how long it will be before the girls begin to make fun of this guy, he will be crying about that soon, what will they do, sue the girls?

      • Gal5:22-23

        Josey do a quick search on the internet, many articles, some decades old about how children are choosing to not shower at school anymore even with gym classes, and many schools not even scheduling time for showering as part of the gym class.

        • Josey

          That may be but they still have to change out of their gym clothes, right?

          • Gal5:22-23

            Which the shy or the motivated can and have always done, even from my time, in a bathroom stall. We had mormons in my school – you never even saw their ritual garments that everyone knew they wore.

      • gonzales27

        All girls should join and mock his small male organ,laugh him out of the room.

        • hytre64

          Then the girls will be disciplined for being bullies – inspite of the way that this young man has bullied his way into THEIR locker room

  • TheBottomline4This

    God doesn’t make any mistakes when He makes a person male or female. Born male, always male. Born female, always female. This trans issue is an emotional/mental issue.

    • NCOriolesFan

      More a mental issue than emotional.

    • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

      Actually, it’s ROM.1:18-32, ie God cursed n changed these sinners/evildoers/law-breakers/blasphemers into transgenders, homosexuals, etc.
      …….Obama’s “Hope n Change”.

  • James Humburg

    That’s what happens when you allow the government to educate your children. Live with it or do something else to educate your children. I can find nowhere in the Bible where the government is to educate our children. The decision is yours parents.

    • Ambulance Chaser

      I can find nowhere in the Bible that you’re allowed to drive a car, own a gun, or use the Internet. Does that mean you have to cease all three?

      • gonzales27

        Off the subject,cars were unheard of during Jesuse’s time

      • James Humburg

        Train up your child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it. God said it not me so I guess you eill have to argue with Him.

        • Ambulance Chaser

          1. God ALLEGEDLY said it, you mean.

          2. That’s an awfully big leap you just made.

          • James Humburg

            There you go again, arguing with the messenger and not the message!

    • hytre64

      Even in today’s society, the decision on *where* to educate your child still belongs to the parent. You can allow them to go to public school, pay for a private school, or educate them at home. All that the state requires (here in the US) is that the children are educated in certain subjects for so many years, and are in school so many days per year.

      Most parents just default back to public schooling because it is (A) the easiest and (B) it is how they were taught. An increasing number of parents are rejecting this path and are homeschooling their own children.

      • James Humburg

        We belong to a church where homeschooling is the norm. Not 100% as some families just need both working to get by. Trump said he would dismantle the Dept. of Education which would help our public schools but it’s really hard to say what he will do if he happens to win. I do not trust any politician. We live in a small town with no private or Christian schools within 30miles so that isn’t much of an option for our local parents, most of whom just get by. Thanks for taking the time to write!

        • hytre64

          Speaking as someone who has been a homeschooler for 20+ years, I know that there are difficulties and challenges involved. We made the decision when our first child came along to have my wife stop working & to have her stay home with the children. Sacrificing her income meant a lot of things for our family – no fancy vacations, used vehicles, careful budgeting on food, a house that really is too small for the 8 of us, etc. On the other hand, I am very pleased with the young men and ladies that we have raised, and homeschooling was a substantial part in developing their character.

          I know that there are many styles of homeschooling – all the way from “unschooling” to doing work at the kitchen table, to people actually setting up a classroom in their home, and even groups of homeschool parents organizing a co-op (this is how our kids passed High School Chemistry). I have known parents where one worked a day job, and the other an evening job to be able to bring in the income and to be able to homeschool the children at the same time.

          If someone believes that the public schools are doing a fine job indoctrinatingeducating their children, then that is their right to have their children go there. If they believe that the public schools are not doing the job for their children that should be done, then my recommendation is for them to get on their knees and seek the Lord to find a way to provide for the needs of their children.

          Sorry if this came out as a rant, but it is a subject near and dear to my heart.

          God Bless.

          • James Humburg

            Loved your rant. You are one of the few that refers to schools as indoctrination centers as I do. I wouldn’t send a dog there anymore. I went to public school in the 50’s and 60’s and it had value then. 6 children! Congratulations. We had only one because at the time I was a drunk and a doper. When my son was 14 we all became believers in Christ in a months period. Three changed lives! Several of our chuch families have from 3 to 10 children so we have tons of borrowed grandchildren. One of the homeschool young ladies aced the college boards. It is a real blessing to be around respectful children. Thank you for doing what your children needed. You are a blessing to me.

  • Vanessa Charlton

    How interesting that all other offerings were rejected by the one diagnosed with a disorder. Let’s face it, medically it is in the mind!!! A private area to change for that one student should be welcomed, but nooooo we have to pretend we are a woman and to trample on the rights of the many for the sake of one student with a mental disorder. How stupid is the system!

    • TheBottomline4This

      Oh but it’s all in the name of tolerance, acceptance, choice and most of all the key word is love. It’s the loving thing to do. Enable this emotional/mental issue and you are doing good. Speak out against their idea of who they think they are and you’re bad.
      You are right, the many are being pushed aside for the few.
      It’s good to know that some day they will get what they deserve. Hope they enjoy their temporary victories, cause it’s not going to end good for them.

  • The Last Trump

    Now THAT’S more like it. It’s a start.
    But seriously. Only 50 families!? C’mon.
    These innocent and helpless children need somebody to stand up for their safety and security.
    The Obama administration should be buried in overwhelming cases of litigation over these policies that any rational human being can clearly discern to be stark raving mad.

  • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

    Obama misinterpreting a US law that protected women/girls, like some Christians misinterpreting the Law n Grace/salvation of God that protect good people, eg Hypergrace n the license to sin.
    …….Such misinterpretation brings harm to those who were supposed to be protected.

  • Destiny2429

    The ACLU still hasn’t secured for women equal pay for equal work, and when I asked them to help my son to get a Free and Appropriate Education in the school, because he has Autism Spectrum Disorder, they didn’t have the time to do that, but they trumpet the cause of this insanity?! Just because someone says they feel like a man, or a woman, doesn’t make them one! Your DNA decides that. ..XX WOMAN…XY MAN! HEY, if someone says they feel more like a cat or a dog, is the ACLU going to trumpet that cause? This is ridiculous! The ACLU rather obliterate the rights of the many, for the few!

    • Josey

      So sorry to hear about the hoops they are putting you through with your son, I’ve heard this from a lot of parents with special needs children, it is insanity that they fight for getting someone who is male who likes to dress like a girl or thinks he is a girl but don’t fight for your son who needs the help. Sad to say, they don’t care about the children, all they care about is pushing this agenda.

      • Destiny2429

        That’s the truth…and according to the Bible, it’s going to get a lot worse. Ephesians 6:13-16…

    • Gal5:22-23

      The ACLU takes cases that involve civil liberties and although I sympathize there are other groups that could help you that are more in line with their mission statements. The ACLU advocates for disabilities being treated differently than other students, but advocating for special programs for those with disabilities isn’t their focus.

      And you frankly don’t understand much about DNA. Everyone has the same genetic information, all has all the genetic information needed to have male or female qualities. The only thing essential for gender expression on the Y chromosome is a single gene, the SRY, that is the trigger for androgen production.

      But the ‘DNA’ truth is that people can develop male qualities without it, and retain the beginning female qualities even if they’ve got it.

      In contrast no one has any genetic information to make them a cat or a dog.

      And what right is the ACLU obliterating? The ‘right’ to only share rest rooms with the people you want? We saw the result of validating that kind of thinking in the 50’s south.

      • Josey

        Give me a break, this is not the same as separating blacks from whites, this is about privacy for opposite genders, keep it in your pants buddy, have you no decency?

        • Gal5:22-23

          And how is seeing a body part every single person knows people have an invasion of privacy? Again, if there is a right to privacy that means every student has a right to a private dressing room.

          How is ‘privacy’ by race any less invidious than privacy because of a body part? Are you saying a student with a disability could be excluded because of a ‘right’ for other students to not see it?

          • Josey

            Don’t twist my words! This is about gender not disability, a disabled gal has the same genitalia as the rest of the girls. Now, a girl who thinks she is a guy can use the boy’s facilities, sure the boys would have a hayday with that. why aren’t we hearing about girls who think they are boys using the boy’s facilities? Those girls probably understand how it would not be a safe environment for them. Well, the boy who thinks he is a girl will end up even more messed up than he is now, It’s just the way it is and it’s not helping him at all.

          • Gal5:22-23

            I’m trying to clarify your desire, not twist your words. And a simple internet search shows there have been a number of FtoM cases, they just aren’t covered in the major media news cycle – a warning to always be suspicious of the news you’re being selectively told.

            Again, why is off chance of seeing genitalia any more a privacy issue than seeing anything else unfamiliar? And reading the articles about students who are choosing not to shower since the 1990’s, their concern isn’t trans people but the critical judgment of their cis-gendered classmates.

          • Tyler

            I’m a trans myself..and I would never want to use guy’s restroom knowing the risk is to get raped,beaten,killed,emotionally abused,knowing there are many guys in this world that do not like trans..they’d prolly do something to you if u’re in the same restroom as them,IF they’re against lgbtq…. +that not ALL people in this world like lgbtq obviously so why take the risk?..

      • Josey

        Truly, you insult black ppl with your statement by making it sound like these are the same issues. Blacks fought hard for their equality for they had no choice in what color of skin they were born with but transgenders have a choice.

        • Gal5:22-23

          No I don’t insult black people, the notion that they would want their rights and deny them to someone else is the insult.

          • Destiny2429

            No, it is an insult to take away the rights of the many for the few. Women and girls should have the right to go to the bathroom without men being in the bathroom.

          • Gal5:22-23

            this is about Trans women not men.

        • Ambulance Chaser

          Transgender people have a choice? Why would anyone choose to be transgender?

          I’ll need a citation for that, please.

          • Josey

            Because they like dressing up like women or vice versa, they need mental help not encouragement. They are sick in the head, that’s why. You might like wearing women’s panties and probably have done so in secret and now you’re happy that you can come out and wear them in public. It’s a choice a man makes to put on women’s clothing or vice versa, just as it’s a choice in what I decide what to wear today.

          • Ambulance Chaser

            They need mental help? Okay what kind? Based on whose research and what theory?

            What would this mental help entail?

          • Destiny2429

            Reading and studying God’s Word, maybe obtaining a life applications Bible to better understand the history of the Bible, and meanings. That would be a good start. The Bible shows a person where he/she is faulty, and helps that person to change, if their heart is open to it. All fall short of the glory of God. Taking scriptures out of context without truly studying them would not help someone to understand the Bible. Someone has to seek God in order to find him, and that requires work…

          • Ambulance Chaser

            So, studying the Bible cures transgenderism? Can you show me some evidence of this? Preferably in a peer-reviewed journal with a high impact factor.

          • Tyler

            They do NOT need help…ppl should be the one accepting the way they are…there’s no “cure” to make trans ppl “healthy”..they were born that way and ppl who do not like and are against it cannot change a person who is born that way…

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            Well, transgenders n other LGBTQs chose to reject God n His Law. So God cursed n changed them into what they r. Obama’s Hope-n-Change.? = ROMANS.1:18-32.

          • Destiny2429

            What kind of citation are you looking for, because I have plenty of Bible citations I could give you…and as far as the law goes, many laws are based on how another judge ruled in a different case. The judge could be wrong, but if the opposing party didn’t have an attorney, or a good attorney to protect their interests, a precedent would be set, that could be wrong..and many precedents have been set that are not right. The Word of God does not change, and if anyone would put time and effort into understanding it, it would be LIFE to those who find it. The only true wisdom anyone can have comes from God and his beautiful Word.

      • Slidellman4life

        Mason’s Second Law.

      • Destiny2429

        First of all, the law says children are entitled to a Free and Appropriate Education.. but the reality is, if you do not have enough money to pay for an advocate, and the school chooses to disagree with multiple professionals, ie doctors, neurologists, psychologists and neurologists, the school can veto all of their reports in favor of the school’s report. Too much power is given to the schools to do whatever they want as far as disregarding all of these other professional reports, even though the law says the school must consider them, because the law fails to define what due consideration is, so this leaves anyone who is disabled and low income, when the school chooses to veto all the other reports, with no other option except to file an OCR complaint or do a due process hearing. Let me just say a due process hearing is very expensive, so right off the bat, there will be disabled children of low income who will not be able to get FAPE because their parents do not have the money to afford an attorney or pay for all the witnesses to come to court, plus their day’s pay, not to mention what is costs to have subpoenas served. There is a lot more to this but my point is, anyone who is low income and disabled is at a huge disadvantage in getting FAPE if the school is wrong and doesn’t want to admit it.
        Why didn’t you address the fact that the ACLU still hasn’t protected women in getting equal pay for equal work? There are many single women who are parents, and they need that money to support their children!
        Now, as for DNA, having male qualities, or female qualities does not make one a man or a woman. Having the Y at the end of your chromosomes makes you a boy or a man, genetically, as the case may be. If how you feel dictated your sex, then no one would need a sex change operation…but obviously feeling a certain way doesn’t change a vagina into a penis, or a penis into a vagina…And for the record, feelings are not always right.
        The ACLU is obliterating women’s rights to safety and privacy, in using public restrooms. The ACLU has opened to door to anyone who feels like saying they feel like a woman being able to take advantage of women and children in restrooms! The ACLU has trumpeted the cause of the few, to the detriment of the many!

        • Gal5:22-23

          you understand so little about the origins and nature of gender dimorphism. but thi k you know it all there’s no point in further discussion – it’s hard to fill a up that’s already full

  • Josey

    The Department of Education responded by opining that the district had to permit the student to use the locker room of his choice due to Title IX requirements. The two sides continued in talks for a number of months, but the district held firm on requiring privacy for female students while offering various options for the transgender student, which were refused.
    It said that it desired to “to protect the privacy rights of all students when changing clothes or showering before or after physical education and after-school activities, while also providing accommodations necessary to meet the unique needs of individual students.”
    They are insane, protect the one but not the many, yeah, makes sense, NOT! If this was about this boy’s right to some protection he could have used the facility they offered him, then all the kids rights to privacy would have been protected but that wasn’t good enough for this mentally ill kid, nope, he has to be with all the true females and wreck their privacy, so sick of schools giving in to this garbage.

    • Gal5:22-23

      Privacy from what? If there is a right to privacy then that means each student should get their own change room and obviously they don’t. So define exactly what they are being made ‘private’ from?

      • hytre64

        They are being “private” from persons who possess the physical genitalia of those of the opposite sex.

        Personally, if the school district & parents loses to the Federal Bullies, I hope that the students and/or parents call in the local police each and every time that this confused individual disrobes/showers in the presence of these young women.

        Indecent viewing – knowingly and wrongfully views the private area of another person, without that other person’s consent and under circumstances in which that other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy;

        Indecent exposure – who intentionally exposes, in an indecent manner, the genitalia, anus, buttocks, or female areola or nipple is guilty of indecent exposure

        Any adult supervising the locker rooms should be charged with the following:

        Contributing to the delinquency of a minor – Any action by an adult that allows or encourages illegal behavior by a person under the age of 18, or that places children in situations that expose them to illegal behavior.

        • Gal5:22-23

          ‘Privacy’ from an arbitrary thing. And since no one is viewing anything the other person hasn’t exposed, and doing indecent exposure is actionable no matter the sexes of those viewing it would be a waste of time.

          • hytre64

            Using your argument, then there is nothing wrong with the hotel manager walking into a hotel room shower where one of his “guests” are showering. After all, he has the key, so he is not breaking & entering, and he isn’t viewing anything the other person hasn’t exposed…

          • Gal5:22-23

            Wrong? or illegal? Your example was about calling the police, i.e. illegal. The legality of when a hotel owner can or cannot enter a room legally is beyond my knowledge and not particularly on topic.

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            So, as a male/man, u do not mind the presence of females/women while u r using the urinals in the public men’s bathroom/restroom = yr privacy/modesty isn’t invaded.?.

          • TheKingOfRhye

            I’ll just jump in on that one…..since you directed me to this story yourself, after all.

            If there was a person who I knew was a trans man (that means female-to-male transgender) in a mens room while I was using it? That wouldn’t particularly bother me, why should it? What’s the worst that would happen, he might see my junk, or I might see theirs? Maybe I just have different ideas about privacy and modesty than you (to be fair, I suppose everyone has varying ideas of that), but I don’t think that would be the end of the world or something.

            Also, the question that brings to my mind is would I even be likely to know that that person is transgender, anyway? Unless it was someone I personally knew. I’ve seen pictures of some trans men in news stories and whatnot, I defy anyone to tell me that they would know they were trans if they didn’t know beforehand.

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            R u dense.? I said, ‘the presence of females/women'(= with vaginas), n not the presence of transvestites(= males/men with penises in women attire)

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Did you read what I said? I was talking about female-to-male transgender people, or in other words, someone born female living as male. I assumed that’s what you meant when you were talking about women in the men’s room. Or are you asking about if a cisgender woman was going in the men’s room? If so, I don’t know how that’s relevant here, but anyway, I probably think it was a little strange, but still wouldn’t feel like I’d been scarred for life or something.

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            U r confused with my plain language n words for normal women/girls/females with vaginas bc u hv eaten the poisoned apple of the LGBTQs n their liberal masters from the Blue States. Cisgender.! Pisgender.?

            U hv not stated whether u mind or do not mind the presence of NORMAL/straight women/girls/females while u r …….

          • TheKingOfRhye

            I’ll quote myself from my last post when I answered that very question.

            “Or are you asking about if a cisgender (that’s another word for what you called “NORMAL/straight women/girls/females”, by the way) woman was going in the men’s room? If so, I don’t know how that’s relevant here, but anyway, I would probably think it was a little strange, but still wouldn’t feel like I’d been scarred for life or something.” I thought that was clear enough, aside from the terminology I guess you didn’t know. I guess maybe I should have been a little clearer there.

            Like I said, though, I don’t know how that is relevant to this issue. This is all about transgender people, not those who aren’t and for whatever reason are using the restroom of the opposite gender.

            “U r confused with my plain language n words”

            Not that I’m particularly confused by it, but half of what you’re using isn’t even words, really.

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            Let me remind u of what I had said earlier in the other thread, …….
            ” …n intrude the privacy n modesty of girls/women by the presence of
            penises of transvestites or masquerading transvestites in the women’s
            bathroom/restroom.”

            Hence, then I asked u, “So, u do not mind the presence of women/girls while u r using the urinals in public men’s bathrooms/restrooms.?”, referring to normal straight girls/women with vaginas.

          • TheKingOfRhye

            And another thing….you said “NORMAL/straight women/girls/females”. What does if a woman’s straight or gay or bisexual have to do with any of this? Homosexual does not mean transgender.

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            Fyi, nearly all transgenders r homosexuals or will become homosexuals. It is common sense that transvestites would wanna hv sex with men, n not with women.

          • Gal5:22-23

            Been to a number of festivals where women come into the men’s restroom to use the unused stalls. No one bats an eye.

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            I was referring to decent public bathrooms/restrooms like those in Target.

            …….Most festivals r wild n indecent, often filled with booze, drugs n sex. Hence, no one bats an eye, even at naked couples having sex in public. If this is done in Target, they would be arrested by the police.

            Maybe, yr frequenting of a number of such festivals where no one bats an eye at indecency reflects on yr character n fruits/works, as in GAL.5:19-21 =

            19 Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery,[c] fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy, murders,[d] drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

          • Gal5:22-23

            Lots of projection there. Nope the women just needed to use the restroom and the women was full.

            The only person thinking erotically about a situation like that is you.

          • disqus_O2BUmbLecp

            Lots of rationalization, excuses n denials there.

          • Gal5:22-23

            No need to rationalize, people don’t think of someone using the restroom as erotic.

  • Mark Johnston

    Ovomit sure does stick up for fags………….and goat humpers and christian killers……but not ‘Merica or its servicemen

  • Grace Kim Kwon

    The Western nations need Judeo-Christian values for sanity and morality and safety.

  • BarkingDawg

    High school kids don’t use the locker rooms anyway.

    • hytre64

      After gym class, you as sweaty, and stinky and in the wrong clothes for the rest of your school day. The High School kids had better use the locker rooms to shower and change.

      • BarkingDawg

        Most don’t.

        • hytre64

          So, do they walk around the rest of the day in their stinky gym clothes?

          • BarkingDawg

            No, they put their regular clothes back on.

          • hytre64

            … And where do they change?