NYC Requires Businesses to Replace ‘Men,’ ‘Women’ Single-Stall Restroom Signs With Unisex Wording

bathroom-signs-1310208-640x480-compressedNEW YORK — City council members in New York City voted on Tuesday to require businesses to remove signs reading “men” and “women” outside single-stall restrooms to further the city’s policies on transgender restroom use.

The move was passed 47-2 and is expected to be signed by Mayor Bill De Blasio, who signed an executive order in March that allows men who identify as women and vice versa to use city-owned restroom facilities and locker rooms in accordance with their preferred identity.

As previously reported, the order applies to both transgender and “gender non-conforming” persons, the latter of whom are defined as those “who do not follow other people’s ideas or stereotypes about how they should look or act based on the female or male sex they were assigned at birth.”

Tuesday’s ordinance applies to restaurants and other businesses throughout the city’s five boroughs, and requires public establishments to replace the gender specific signs with unisex wording by Jan. 1. Business owners could be fined up to $500 for non-compliance.

While some have praised the move as “creating a welcoming environment for transgender or gender non-conforming people,” others have found the requirement to be another encroachment by Big Brother.

“While most employers would be fine on a gender-neutral approach to their bathrooms, having the City Council add this to dozens of other interventions in the last three years has a cumulative negative impact on the perceived business climate in New York,” Kathryn Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York City, told the Wall Street Journal.

In December, the New York City Commission on Human Rights also announced new guidelines under the city’s Human Rights Law that imposes fines on employers who use masculine pronouns for male workers who wish to identify as women and vice versa.

  • Connect with Christian News

The Commission’s interpretive guide notes that businesses are prohibited from “[i]ntentionally failing to use an individual’s preferred name, pronoun or title,” such as “repeatedly calling a transgender woman ‘him’ or ‘Mr.’ when she has made it clear that she prefers female pronouns and a female title.”

The guidelines further state that employers “should not limit the options for identification to male and female only,” as “[s]ome transgender and gender non-conforming people prefer to use pronouns other than he/him/his or she/her/hers, such as they/them/theirs or ze/hir.”

Violations could result in penalties up to $125,000 and up to $250,000 for transgressions of the law that are considered to be “willfull, wanton or malicious conduct.”

De Blasio and the Commission additionally announced earlier this month that they had launched a $265,0000 ad campaign in recognition of “LGBT Pride Month” that touts the city’s policy requiring that citizens be permitted to use the restroom that correlates with their “gender identity.” The print ads and videos are now appearing on subway cars, bus shelters, phone booths, and in newspapers and various social media placements.

“Use the restroom consistent with who you are,” the ads read, featuring photographs of transgendered residents. “Look past pink and blue.”

Tuesday’s ordinance only applies to single-stall restrooms and not multiple-stall facilities.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • TheBottomline4This

    It’s silly to enable a mental illness. Go to youtube and watch a video entitled
    “Former Transgender Exposes Trans Movement! Walt Heyer | Louder With Crowder”
    A very interesting interview. About 33 min.

    • Ambulance Chaser

      Unless that “former transgender” has done a broad based, study, conducted to rigorous scientific standards, I don’t see that anything he or she has to say is relevant to the topic.

      • Guest

        Agreed but what relevant studies are there that conclude transgenderism is real? Often the scientific data on trans issues are silenced due to its contradictory findings that ppl of that persuasion do not want dispersed.

  • Amos Moses

    Babylon (NYC) just continues to become more and more ancient Babylon ………………..

    • Grace Kim Kwon

      Archaeologists will find the reason why the sea level rose, if the world continues.

  • Grace Kim Kwon

    “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” is about a woman’s plight who suffered child-abuse. Things got far worse.

  • Josey

    If I lived in this city, I’d be looking to move out the cesspool it has become, as a matter of fact, I would get out of large cities altogether, let the crows have them since not very many ppl are willing to elect leaders who have wisdom and common sense. New York, used to want to visit and sightsee there, have not one desire to go there any longer, been to the JFK airport, that was close enough.

    • Ambulance Chaser

      I take it you disagree with this law. Why?

  • Michael C

    This law only applies to signage on single occupancy bathrooms.

    If a business has a bathroom with just one stall and a lock on the door, it can be used by either men or women.

    This law does not make NYC bathrooms gender neutral. This law does not force NYC businesses to have gender neutral bathrooms.

    • Ambulance Chaser

      Who needs facts when you have outrage?

  • hytre64

    The real transgression was hidden half-way through the article. Business OWNERS can be fined $125,000 or $250,000 for not forcing their employees to call a person by their CHOSEN form of address IF they are “gender non-conforming”.

    I am glad that I don’t work in NYC. My boss would lose out on a lot of money, because the cognitive dissonance of calling a male, “her” or “she” would mean that it just wouldn’t happen.

    BTW, my person pronoun has now been changed to “Majesty”. ;-}

  • bowie1

    At least a person has privacy with a locked door.

  • Nidalap

    Nonsensical. The words “men” and “women” are offensive now…

  • TheKingOfRhye

    Well, this has to be the most thoroughly insignificant piece of ‘news’ I’ve ever read. Nothing will change but the signs on some bathrooms….big freakin’ deal.

  • Ronald Carter

    What exactly is the controversy here?