Texas Finalizes Rule Requiring Burial or Cremation of Aborted Babies Instead of Landfill Disposal

Stericycle DenverAUSTIN, Texas — Health officials in Texas have announced that they will move forward with implementing a rule requiring the burial or cremation of aborted babies instead of the current allowance under the law to dispose of the dead children as medical waste.

According to the Texas Tribune, the rule was finalized on Monday and is set to take effect on Dec. 19.

Abortion advocacy groups have decried the requirement, calling it a part of the so-called war on women, and have threatened litigation.

“These new restrictions reveal the callous indifference that Texas politicians have toward women,” Center for Reproductive Rights attorney David Brown told reporters this week.

But Gov. Greg Abbott, who had requested that the Department of State Health Services construct the rule, opined that babies shouldn’t be treated like garbage.

“Governor Abbott believes human and fetal remains should not be treated like medical waste, and the proposed rule changes affirms the value and dignity of all life,” spokesperson Ciara Matthew said in a statement in July. “For the unborn, the mothers and the hospital and clinic staff, the governor believes it is imperative to establish higher standards that reflect our respect for the sanctity of life.”

And while some had argued that the rule would increase costs for abortion facilities and hospitals, and possibly thus increasing costs for abortion-minded mothers, the state health department said that the cost shouldn’t be more than what facilities are currently paying medical waste disposal companies.

  • Connect with Christian News

“What we found through our research is that the proposed rules won’t increase total costs for healthcare facilities,” representative Carrie Williams told the Dallas Morning News. “While the methods described in the new rules may have a cost, that cost is expected to be offset by costs currently being spent by facilities on disposition for transportation, storage, incineration, steam disinfection and/or landfill disposal.”

As previously reported, abortion facilities customarily contract with third party medical waste companies to dispose of the aborted babies, which are usually classified as “pathological waste.” The containers of aborted babies, mixed in with boxes of bodily fluids, tissues and other items that are not permitted to be thrown in the trash, are then transported to an incineration plant where they are burned into ash and then dumped into landfills.

However, current Texas law also allows for other types of disposal, including “grinding and discharging to a sanitary sewer system,” “chlorine disinfection/maceration followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill” or other “approved alternate treatment process, provided that the process renders the item as unrecognizable, followed by deposition in a sanitary landfill.”

Sometimes abortion facilities fail to label the boxes for incineration and the children are therefore transported to autoclave sites where they are only steam cleaned before being transported to landfills. As previously reported, and as outlined by the Campaign to Stop Stericycle, the medical waste company Stericycle was fined $42,000 in Texas in 2011 for dumping fetal remains from Whole Woman’s Health in Austin with household and commercial trash.

“It was explained that medical waste is placed in red biohazard bags, then placed into boxes provided by Stericycle. Each fetus resulting from an abortion is placed into a hard plastic container and then into a red biohazard bag. The bag is then placed into a freezer, where it is stored,” an investigative report from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) outlined.

“When Stericycle arrives to transport the medical waste, the individual fetuses are removed from the freezer and placed into another large red biohazard bag. The red biohazard bag containing the fetuses is placed into the medical waste box along with other medical waste generated at the facility that requires treatment,” it continued.

Stericycle and other medical waste companies will now no longer be able to dispose of the babies when the new rules go into effect.

“We hope that this law helps our nation to see the humanity of the child in the womb and also helps women who are contemplating abortion to understand more fully the unique gift of a child,” Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins told reporters.

The rule will not apply to women who suffer a miscarriage, and a death certificate will not be required for the children.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, our hearts are deeply grieved by the ongoing devastation in Iraq, and through this we have been compelled to take a stand at the gates of hell against the enemy who came to kill and destroy. Bibles for Iraq is a project to put Arabic and Kurdish audio Bibles into the hands of Iraqi and Syrian refugees—many of whom are illiterate and who have never heard the gospel.Will you stand with us and make a donation today to this important effort? Please click here to send a Bible to a refugee >>

Print Friendly
  • Amos Moses

    Stericycle is connected to Mitt Romney ……….

  • james blue

    “– “Governor Abbott believes human and fetal remains should not be treated like medical waste, and the proposed rule changes affirms the value and dignity of all life,” —”

    “–The rule will not apply to women who suffer a miscarriage–”

    So miscarried babies don’t matter when it comes to “the value and dignity of all life” ?

    This is a dumb law.

    • Bob Johnson

      And no death certificate – so I guess the child wasn’t alive.

      • Amos Moses

        it has been my experience that the family usually requests care for the remains in those instances ………….

    • Amos Moses

      it has been my experience that the family usually requests care for the remains in those instances …………. so not so dumb ……

      • james blue

        Experienced a lot of that have you?

      • james blue

        There is no law preventing them from doing so. What “usual experience” would that be?

  • David Stoneslinger

    Good.

  • Lexical Cannibal

    Oh look. A law that makes life disproportionately harder for poor people. Poor people, who are perhaps the most inadequately attended to group, in terms of safe sex education and practices. Double Trouble!

    Keep up the good work, republicans. You’ll be rid of that nasty middle class one day!

  • bowie1

    I’d hate to work on those landfills in case I would see human parts in little bits and pieces and would feel terrible about shoving them into the ground with a backhoe. Is a decent burial too much to ask!

    • james blue

      What’s wrong with incineration?

      • bowie1

        It’s one of the requirements with the practice of cremation in this bill. But then it would be put in an urn and buried in a grave site I assume.

        • james blue

          And it’s the latter requirement that goes too far. Beyond public health reasons the state should stay out of it.

  • Bob Johnson

    Does Texas code C.C.P. Art.49.04 paragraph (8) apply?

  • Ira Pistos

    It may yet come to pass that we bring to an end the mass murder of children.