Obama Administration Finalizes Rule Banning States From Defunding Planned Parenthood

Photo Credit: All Nite Images

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration finalized a rule on Wednesday that bans states from defunding family planning organizations such as Planned Parenthood because they abort unborn children.

“This rule will strengthen access to essential services like cancer screenings and contraception for some of the most vulnerable patients in this country,” Chief Medical Officer Karen Scott of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, said in a statement. “Public comments showed overwhelming support for finalizing the rule, which clarifies that all organizations able to provide these services should be eligible to compete for funds.”

A reported 145,000 comments were received about the intended rule.

As previously reported, in September, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking, advising that intended to amend the Code of Federal Regulations to read, “No recipient making subawards for the provision of services as part of its Title X project may prohibit an entity from participating for reasons unrelated to its ability to provide services effectively.”

Title X was enacted in 1970 under the Public Health Service Act and authorizes the Office of Population Affairs to oversee the disbursement of federal funds for the purpose of assisting organizations that offer “family planning” services. States distribute the capital to reproductive and women’s health organizations as they see fit.

In recent years, a number of states have sought to defund the abortion giant Planned Parenthood after granting the organization funds for years, stating that they do not wish to assist groups that provide abortion services, even if the funds will not be directly used for abortion.

But the Obama administration contends that stripping abortion facilities of funding results in undesired births, and that such locations are important because they provide contraceptives.

  • Connect with Christian News

“Reducing access to Title X services has many adverse effects. Title X services have a dramatic effect on the number of unintended pregnancies and births in the United States,” HHS said in September. “For example, services provided by Title X-funded sites helped prevent an estimated 1 million unintended pregnancies in 2010 which would have resulted in an estimated 501,000 unplanned births.”

The department made similar remarks on Wednesday, remarking that the organizations are valuable because they also provide testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including HIV, as well as other reproductive-related services. It acknowledged that its rulemaking effort was meant to stop states from defunding the facilities.

“In the past several years, a number of states have taken actions to restrict participation by certain types of providers as subrecipients in the Title X Program, unrelated to the provider’s ability to provide family planning services,” HHS wrote. “This has caused limitations in the geographic distribution of services and decreased access to services.”

“The final rule clarifies the Title X program regulations by adding that no grant recipient making subawards for the provision of services as part of its Title X project may prohibit an entity from participating for reasons other than its ability to provide Title X services,” it said.

But the religious liberties group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) decried the new regulation, remarking that there are plenty of organizations that offer the same services as Planned Parenthood, minus the child-killing. It said that states should have the freedom to fund the women’s health groups that they wish.

“Planned Parenthood isn’t superior to true, publicly-funded health care centers—which are far more numerous—simply because it claims to focus on dispensing birth control, despite being America’s largest abortion business,” said Senior Counsel Steven Aden in a statatement.

“The Obama administration, even in its waning hours, has chosen to put Planned Parenthood’s Big Abortion agenda ahead of women’s health and the right of states to decide how best to prioritize public health funding so that patients and the most comprehensive health providers come first,” he lamented.

According to its annual report released at the end of December, Planned Parenthood performed 323,999 abortions nationwide during the 2014-2015 fiscal year.

The rule is scheduled to take effect on Jan. 18.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. Now, as the cold winds of winter blow in, we are seeking to also meet the physical needs of the people by providing fuel-operated heaters for the refugees and their children to stay warm. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work (James 2:16)? Please click here to send a heater to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly
  • TheBottomline4This

    Finalize what ya want BHO. Things can always be changed 🙂

  • http://www.gmail.com/ David van Heerden

    At least there’s a new dictator next year. (Well, that’s the theory.)

  • Tangent002

    Actually, this isn’t some kind of ‘new rule’, it is a clarification of existing law that is part of the Social Security Act.

    • libertynottyranny

      LOL! Well then, the next administration will have the same authority to “clarify” the same “existing law”. Unbelievable what twisted logic people use.

      Even more laughable is equating PPH (aka baby murder inc) & “social security” – an act who’s purported purpose is to provide retirement benefits. That said, if PP is successful in curbing a sufficient amount of the population (say 95%), you won’t have to worry about social security going broke. Well, it will still go broke but practically nobody will be around to complain about it.

  • bowie1

    What’s up next…knocking off the seniors with euthanasia?

    • Tangent002

      If the ACA is repealed, I’m sure the insurance companies would love that!

    • tatoo

      No, that is a Trump policy.

    • Nidalap

      They’ll use a much more acceptable term.
      They’re just “assisting” them…

      • Grndisland

        They’ll call it Moveon dot org.

    • Grndisland

      Well, yeah.
      Once you start killing inconvenient people, it doesn’t stop.

  • Oboehner

    Since only Congress can legislate, I would have to say what he says or does makes no difference – it’s not legally binding.

    • Robert

      Right trump as president elect can just throw obams rules in the trash again.but will he ??

      • Oboehner

        Doesn’t have to, they aren’t law.

  • Roger Runnalls

    No surprises here, when King Barry can’t get the legislative branch to pass a law he uses the unconstitutional 4th branch (beurcracie) of government to burn the Constitution and do it anyway….

  • Royce E. Van Blaricome

    Trump should announce immediately that he will issue an EO on Day One to retract this and make it null and void. Sent the message now! And make it clear that BHO’s godless liberal agenda will be rolled back!

  • Robert

    Any rules Obama does with out congress can be thrown out by the Trump.

  • Robert

    This is bad. We have no promises from Trump he will throw these laws of Obama’s in the garbage can , or when he will do it.