Woman Who Identifies as Man Sues Catholic Hospital for Denying Hysterectomy for Sex Change Purposes

PATERSON, N.J. — A woman who identifies as a man has sued a Catholic hospital for declining to perform a hysterectomy on her for sex change purposes because of the institution’s religious convictions, and is requesting that the courts force the hospital to provide such services.

Jionni Conforti, 33, is suing St. Joseph’s Healthcare System, Inc. under charges of discrimination because of her preferred “sex, non-conformity with sex stereotypes, and gender identity.”

“Following the death of his mother due to complications from breast cancer in 2004, Jionni, then twenty-one years old, began to present himself in a more masculine way. He cut his hair short, threw out all of his stereotypically-female clothing, and began to dress and present as masculine,” the lawsuit states.

Conforti, who tied the knot with a woman, said she originally thought she was lesbian, but concluded that she was only transgender.

In 2014, she was diagnosed with gender dysphoria and received hormonal therapy as treatment. Later that year, Conforti obtained a double mastectomy “so that his physical appearance would reflect his gender identity.”

The following year, she sought to obtain a hysterectomy—or the removal of her uterus—“to complete full transition from female to male” and because she had been informed that the hormonal treatments she was taking have been linked to reproductive cancers.

Conforti also found a surgeon who had admitting privileges at St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center in Paterson and was willing to perform the procedure.

  • Connect with Christian News

But after contacting the hospital and inquiring as to whether or not it would be an issue, Conforti was soon advised that the operation could not take place at the hospital because of its Catholic identity and beliefs.

“This is to follow up to your e-mail inquiring about scheduling a total hysterectomy here at St. Joseph’s to remove all female parts based on the medical necessity for Gender Reassignment. This is to inform you that as a Catholic hospital we would not be able to allow your surgeon to schedule this surgery here at St. Joseph’s,” an email from Rooney said.

Conforti now asserts that the hospital discriminated against her because its doctors perform hysterectomies on female patients who do not identify as transgender.

“St. Joseph’s Healthcare’s refusal to allow Jionni’s hysterectomy to be performed at their facilities is particularly humiliating and degrading to Jionni because he knows SJRMC provides access to the very same laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure and related treatments to other patients who do not fail to conform to sex stereotypes and are not transgender,” her lawsuit reads.

In December 2015, she filed a complaint with the federal Office for Civil Rights, and last May, was informed that an investigation would be forthcoming. The notification came just a day before the Office issued rules that some have interpreted as requiring doctors to assist with sex change-related procedures, from hysterectomies and mastectomies to hormonal treatments, despite their religious beliefs.

As previously reported, a number of states sued the Obama administration over this rule, including Texas, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Nebraska, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi and Kansas, as well as the Christian Medical and Dental Association and the Roman Catholic Franciscan Alliance. Last Saturday, a federal judge in Texas placed an injunction against the regulation.

“Plaintiffs will be forced to either violate their religious beliefs or maintain their current policies which seem to be in direct conflict with the rule and risk the severe consequences of enforcement,” declared Judge Reed O’Connor.

Conforti is seeking compensatory damages as she says that the hospital’s denial has resulted in “emotional distress, humiliation, degradation, embarrassment, emotional pain and anguish, violation of dignity [and] loss of enjoyment of life.”

She is also seeking a court order forcing St. Joseph’s Healthcare System, Inc. to “provide transgender individuals, including Plaintiff, who seek gender confirmation or gender dysphoria-related health care, with medical assistance for all medically necessary care, regardless of its nature…”

“St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center is a leading Catholic healthcare institution serving one of the most diverse and underserved populations in New Jersey. The Medical Center follows the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services in making decisions about care and treatment,” the hospital said in a statement, declining further comment.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Amos Moses

    why not just identify as a man without one ……… it would save a whole lot of trouble for everyone …………..

    • Grace Kim Kwon

      Manhood is a birthright from the Lord, not just physical. She should never claim it. It is a falsehood. Western civilization was superior only because it sought objective truth while adhering to Christianity. Secularism protects falsehood like a madman, and the oppression must be stopped. The mass made bent to falsehood become villains’ slaves. I think she is another victim of secularism’s decades-long Nazi Youth education. Nazi Youth perished, but America’s youth can be still protected. There is still time.

      • jnail7

        Let me guess, you believe in geocentrism as well, because understanding actual Science takes effort.

        • Grace Kim Kwon

          The Holy Bible’s account has been always correct; consider the sun’s movement inside the galaxy and also the existence of solar system’s invisible “tent.” ( Psalm chapter 19) The sun is not the center in the universe; Jesus came to Israel on Planet Earth and Israel is His beloved. He kept His first promise and will surely keep His second promise. (Revelation chapter 20-22)

    • HazumuOsaragi

      why not just identify as a man without [a hysterectomy]

      Good question.

      Let me present a scenario. A normal woman is diagnosed with one of a variety of maladies – Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, Uterine fibroids, Endometriosis, Uterine prolapse, Cancer, Hyperplasia – that warrant hysterectomy. This is considered usual. If diagnosed by competent medical personnel following up-to-date knowledge and protocol, hospitals – including religious-affiliated hospitals – don’t bat an eye with scheduling treatments and facilities.

      And for many women, a hysterectomy greatly improves their quality of life. My mother was ‘free!!!’ of debilitating ‘flooding’, cramps, pain, and other attendant symptoms. A friend of mine, because of the debilitation she was suffering, told her doctor, “Either you cut it out of me, or I cut my head off!!”

      Now, another scenario. A transman, with a beard and a masculine voice, presents with one of the above usual conditions that warrant a hysterectomy. The religious-affiliated hospitals will likely (because they have already, in previous cases,) call it a ‘!!!SEX!!!CHANGE!!1!!’, and send the patient packing, even though in the case of a normal woman they would schedule OR/bed/other facilities as a matter of course.

      Over the past thirty or more years, there are already several (or more) transmen dead of uterine cancer because hospitals refused the transman a life-saving hysterectomy because [_____].

      • Amos Moses

        here is a clue …… taking out the uterus by hysterectomy ……… does not make anyone a man ……. if a person wants to imagine they are a man ….. imagine that organ gone …… it is as effective …..

        • Grace Kim Kwon

          So true!!!!

        • HazumuOsaragi

          taking out the uterus by hysterectomy ……… does not make anyone a man

          That’s not the point I was making. It’s you saying what you want to say.

          imagine that organ gone …… it is as effective

          That doesn’t work if the organ (in this case ovaries/uterus) has Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, or Uterine fibroids, or Endometriosis, or Uterine prolapse, or Cancer, or Hyperplasia. Yes or no, do you deny treatment in these cases if the person presenting with these medical conditions is ‘imagining they’re a man’?

          • Amos Moses

            “That’s not the point I was making. It’s you saying what you want to say.”

            it is the point you want to ignore …………

          • HazumuOsaragi

            it is the point you want to ignore …………

            That’s a projection and a diversion. The question still is, “Yes or no, do you deny treatment in these cases if the person presenting with these medical conditions is ‘imagining they’re a man’?”

          • Amos Moses

            they will not become a man by removal of organs ……… why do you support physical deformity through surgery of a otherwise healthy body ……….

  • sammy13

    Pick a different hospital, one that does not believe in God or Jesus. One that is divorced from the truth. Plenty of hospitals in America that are not affiliated with religion and would gladly take the money. Discrimination? No. A matter of conscience? Yes.

    • tatoo

      He may not be able to do that. I know that my health plan will only allow me to go the the hospital associated with that plan. So he might be stuck.

  • Scott Davenport

    Do you notice how they keep changing the pronoun they use to describe this Female throughout the article??? I think society is screwing up Her head as much as anything else is…

  • Garden of Love

    The solution cost no one a penny: Accept yourself as God made you and enjoy your life.

    • Ambulance Chaser

      If that were possible, he wouldn’t need a sex change.

      • Grace Kim Kwon

        Bending the truth causes misery.

        • Maybe this might help get rid of some misconceptions. Male–to–female transsexuals have female neuron numbers in a limbic nucleus. Kruiver et al J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2000) 85:2034–2041
          The present findings of somatostatin neuronal sex differences in the BSTc and its sex reversal in the transsexual brain clearly support the paradigm that in transsexuals sexual differentiation of the brain and genitals may go into opposite directions… They’re just trying to get bodies that are congruent, rather than an uncomfortable mixture of male and female. That’s the truth. Those who haven’t studied biology, only theology, tend to get it wrong.

          • Chet

            And those either not indwelt by the Holy Spirit via one’s receiving the Lord Jesus Christ as personal Saviour and Lord or choosing to remain otherwise unlearned in the Holy Bible as God’s Word become easily confounded. Look at Eve…

      • Chet

        It’s not needed to maintain or otherwise effect life, but, rather, desired…

    • jnail7

      Good philosophy, you go first. Accept yourself as God made you, enjoy your life, and do not seek to correct anything with modern medicine, because obviously God made you to have whatever malady you may suffer from (or at least God signed off on it when talking to his pal, the Devil –see Job as an example).

      It is easy to tell others who are suffering to “suck it up”. My bet is when you start physically suffering, you will seek the help of medical science to alleviate that suffering. If so, I name you hypocrite.

  • mary porter

    He / she just wants to sue for the $$$ !!!

  • Nidalap

    A hospital refusing to coddle a mental disease?!?
    Such monsters…

    • jnail7

      I think you mean a religion using its ill gotten financial resources to influence a hospital from administering current best medical practices to its patients? Such monsters…

      • Nidalap

        Nope! Don’t mean that at all! (^_^)

        • jnail7

          So it is to be willful ignorance on your part then? Well played.

  • Grace Kim Kwon

    People must live according to the Creator God’s assigned gender. Christians have rights to live out God’s truth and to reject to serve a falsehood (transgender). That was the reason of rights and freedom’s establishment.

    • Apparently God disagrees with you, Grace. Please stop telling him what He can and cannot do, and listen and watch what He actually does. Example : Science 1974 Dec 27; 186 (4170): 1213-5
      In an isolated village of the southwestern Dominican Republic, 2% of the live births were in the 1970’s, guevedoces… These children appeared to be girls at birth, but at puberty these ‘girls’ sprout muscles, testes, and a penis. For the rest of their lives they are men in nearly all respects. Their underlying pathology was found to be a deficiency of the enzyme, 5-alpha Reductase.

      • Grace Kim Kwon

        Don’t blame God for humanity’s sins. Besides, manhood and womanhood is not just physical. It’s true modern pollution from chemical things is causing harms to planet’s life where they conduct experiments. That evil should be stopped, too.

        • This description from Trans Torah/Rabbi Elliot Kukla:

          Zachar/זָכָר: This term is derived from the word for a pointy sword and refers to a phallus. It is usually translated as “male” in English.

          Nekeivah/נְקֵבָה: This term is derived from the word for a crevice and probably refers to a vaginal opening. It is usually translated as “female” in English.

          Androgynos/אַנְדְּרוֹגִינוֹס: A person who has both “male” and “female” sexual characteristics. 149 references in Mishna and Talmud (1st-8th Centuries CE); 350 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes (2nd -16th Centuries CE).

          Tumtum/ טֻומְטוּם A person whose sexual characteristics are indeterminate or obscured. 181 references in Mishna and Talmud; 335 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes.

          Ay’lonit/איילונית: A person who is identified as “female” at birth but develops “male” characteristics at puberty and is infertile. 80 references in Mishna and Talmud; 40 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes.

          Saris/סריס: A person who is identified as “male” at birth but develops “female” characteristics as puberty and/or is lacking a penis. A saris can be “naturally” a saris (saris hamah), or become one through human intervention (saris adam). 156 references in mishna and Talmud; 379 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            Useless. Read the Holy Bible, the Word of God to obtain the truth. The Jews get saved by believing in their Messiah Jesus.

          • jnail7

            LOL, you win the Ignoble Ignorant Internet post of the day award.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            Yes, the salvation of Israel by their Messiah Jesus is true. The Holy Bible said it. The Jews are mere mortal humans, but the Word of God is eternal. ( Isaiah chapter 40 and chapter 53)

            The Holy Bible says: “For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: ‘The Deliverer(Jesus) will come out of Zion, and He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; For this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.’ Concerning the Gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” (Romans chapter 11)

      • Mr Cleats

        Alan is back, big deal.

      • Jason Todd

        Hey, Alan.

        Since your defense of transgenderism is obviously self-serving, feel free to explain the following:

        1) Walt Heyer
        2) The high suicide rate among transsexuals
        3) Stefonknee Wolscht
        4) The Wachowski Brothers
        5) Transanimals

  • Grace Kim Kwon

    Why do Americans always sue the Christians and not Hindus or Buddhists or Muslims or the Jews? Americans should not oppress the Christians thinking they are the majority. Oppression against the majority is still evil and an oppression.

    • Christianity prohibits sex change? Really? Citation please, from either scripture or magisterium.

      • Grace Kim Kwon

        Read Genesis chapter 1. Secular West is wasting money on a planet of 4 billion starving humans. Rich people’s warped entertainment will be punished with childlessness as well. Read Revelation, too.

        • Genesis 1 also states the circke if the Earth, the disk, is protected from the waters above that fill the universe by Firmament, upon which are affixed two great lights, sun and moon, and lots of little lamps, the stars. Baruch’s detaiked account of the tower of Babel shows the height at that point is 463 cubits, about 230 metres. Half the height of the Empire State building. So as a science text, Genesis isn’t completely reliable, is it?

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            Genesis 1 says God created them male and female. Period. Post-christian Westerners are too immoral to comprehend the Holy Bible and Christian books including the writings of their own Christian forefathers. You guys must come from the outer space or something to destroy the USA and global children. Not resemble your Christian forefathers a bit – a different species. Why do you guys promote such deadly decadence? For what purpose? Read Revelation to know the planet’s end. Every Sodom gets destroyed by the Lord.

          • jnail7

            So God made them hermaphrodites (the distinction from using the union conjunction “and” versus the disjunction “or”)? That is an important distinction.

            Revelations has no bearing on Jesus’s teachings and has done much to derail many self-professed followers of Jesus from actually doing what Jesus taught (like the writings of Paul do as well). Only those who are weak in faith need such literary golden calves in their lives.

            The real test if you actually know your Bible or not, what did Jesus say was the sin of Sodom? Now, how are you any different?

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            You are wrong. God created no such thing. It’s sinful man’s rebellion or a mental illness. The books by the OT prophets and Revelation talks about utter destruction of civilizations like today’s depraved powerful USA. America can still repent and live. Repentance brings a longer life span as observed in history. What did Jesus say about the sins of Sodom? And did He say that? He condemned every child-abuser. Read Genesis chapter 18 and 19 to find how evil Sodom’s men were. They lusted over anyone.

          • jnail7

            If God made man and God is all knowing and all powerful, then God is the creator of Sin and all results that spring forth. To claim otherwise is to claim God is either not all powerful or not all knowing, thus fallible.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            You are wrong. Man sins with free will and the consequence belongs to him alone. If USA teaches its children homosexuality and gets destroyed like Nazi Germany was, the outcome is to be blamed on USA’s evil stupidity alone and on no one else.

          • jnail7

            Who created freewill?

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            God gave us freewill. Usage is up to every individual. Revelation chapter 20.

          • jnail7

            Then God created the tool to allow Evil to exist. Again a conspirator to the existence of evil.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            God created only good. (Genesis chapter 1) Evil does not exist independently but is a corruption of good. Man’s attempt to godless autonomy by his free will is the problem. “Truly, this only I have found: that God made man upright, but they have sought out many schemes.” (Ecclesiastes chapter7) Jesus Christ died for sinners and solved the problem once and for all. You can get saved by repenting of the evil unbelief. ( John chapter 3)

          • jnail7

            So you are going with God not being all powerful in that something exists in Creation that God did not create. Also, you are going with God not being all knowing, otherwise he would have known what would happen if he began Creation, and by knowing would have been a conspirator to Evil’s creation in continuing with Creation.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            Don’t jump into false conclusions; your culture is too well-fed and bored you have no discernment. Read the Holy Bible before believing in your own falsehood.

          • jnail7

            That is a dodge. I jumped to no conclusions. It is called logic. It is a tool to assess the validity and evaluate truth values of claims. If your statements were true, the result ends exactly how I describe. That is cognitive dissonance on your part that requires you to dodge my comment and reply back with an attack.

          • jnail7

            “God created only good”
            Tell that to Job.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            Calamities are not moral evil.

          • jnail7

            Wow, you just proved that you do not know your Bible. By whose permission was Evil, itself, allowed to bring harm to those around Job?

          • jnail7

            Also, who explicitly hardened Pharoah’s heart to ensure that free will would not allow Pharoah to see the wisdom in releasing Mose’s people?

          • HazumuOsaragi

            Genesis 1 says God created them male and female. Period.

            What’s the meaning of this verse – the part about male and female -?

            There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Christ Jesus. — Galatians 3:28

          • Jason Todd

            Not what you want it to mean.

          • HazumuOsaragi

            Not what you want it to mean.

            TRANSLATION: “Take a long walk on a short pier!”

            Rather than offering an insult, what does it mean to you? I’d like to know. You can crib your answer from [grace kim kwon], if you like – the part that’s not an insulting ad hominem attack.

          • Jason Todd

            It’s not about what it means to me. It’s about what the Bible says.

            People like to take verses out of context and twist them to fit their own agenda. Matthew 7:1 is often used as a means to silence opposition to sin: “I can do whatever I want, and you’re supposed to be quiet. If you aren’t, you’re judging me.” The problem is, when you actually read the rest of the chapter, it becomes obvious Jesus was talking about hypocrisy.

            Same thing applies when focus is given on Galatians 3:28. People wish to use it as a way to assert transgenderism is compatible with Christianity.

            But taking a step back and reading the entire chapter tells a different story indeed:

            “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:26-28 KJV).”

            Clearly what’s being said here is in being a Child of God, we are all the same.

            Ignorance, willful or otherwise, does not impress those who take the time to read and understand the Word of God.

            There’s your answer.

          • HazumuOsaragi

            Clearly what’s being said here is in being a Child of God, we are all the same.

            On that, we are in agreement.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            The former is on creation of genders and the latter is on equal status. Grade 2 grammar. If people interpret writings like you do, China will clain the entire territory of USA for the payment of your debt.

          • HazumuOsaragi

            the latter is on equal status.

            Is there equal status, then?

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            Race and gender are not the same as choosing sexual sins. What went wrong with you guys? USA is afraid of offending anyone except for the gentle Christian population. USA thinks the Christians are easy target to bully. This yeasr’s religious persecutor = USA. What a shame. You guys have no sense of fairness whatsoever without the Christian virtues.

          • Grace Kim Kwon

            Godless de-christianized West’s craziness proved to the entire universe that the Holy Bible has been absolutely right all along. I really feel sorry for all your Christian ancestors. Happy is a man whose descendants are not secular Westerners or their mental slaves who go nude in public and disrespect their own parents. What’s wrong with you guys?

  • This style 10/6

    Hospitals should do their job without bringing religion into the act.

    • libertynottyranny

      Patients should just be patients w/o bringing a political agenda into medicine.

      She intentionally pushed the issue by contacting the hospital asking “if it would be an issue”… yet she already had a physician w/ admittance, willing to give her what she supposedly wanted.

      When have you ever contacted a hospital to ask if it would be okay for you to get X done for Y reason? Never. The physician admits & you show up.

      The hospital never needed to know anything more than the procedure between the doc & the paitient. But of course what she was really after was a lawsuit, not a hysterectomy (otherwise she’d have gotten one by now).

      • jnail7

        She may have been required to as part of fulfilling her obligations for insurance coverage. Insurance companies are notorious for demanding proper medical coding when billed. And many prefer to have everything pre-approved when possible (ie. non emergency visits). Finally, if she did not inquire, then likely when she arrived for surgery, she would be turned away because her surgeon would have had to explain the intended procedure for procuring the surgical ward. Costing her and her surgeon more time, resources, and humiliation, which would then be included on the discrimination lawsuit.

        • libertynottyranny

          Really? How many many surgeries have you had or been personally involved in? What you are stating is your conjecture & is rubbish.

          Insurance co do not require patients to contact the hospital to inform them why they are having a procedure – that is between the Dr & the patient, the ins co is only concerned w/ whether the procedure (e.g. hysterectomy) is covered & what the negotiated cost will be. If her Dr said she “needed” a hysterectomy, has admittance at a facility, then there is nothing more to do than schedule.

          Furthermore the hospital will code what services they provide (not why the Dr & paitient decided a procedure was necessary). More importantly, it is her physician, the one performing the procedure, that will be billing the ins co for the hysterectomy, not the hospital (they will bill for the use of the facility, & other hospital stay related expenses).

          As to your other conjecture-that the hospital would somehow discover her ultimate plan for having a hysterectomy once she arrived, unless she volunteered it, that is nonsense. A hysterectomy is a very common procedure, it’s not like anyone would question it.

          This lady intended to create a situation for a lawsuit, period. It’s as plain to see as the nose on your face.

          • jnail7

            First, don’t complain about conjecturing if you, yourself started off with conjecturing the patient’s motive.

            Next, hospitals collect data, not just on procedures performed, but on the medical conditions that required the procedures to help track national health trends(NIH wants their numbers). While hysterectomies are common, many due to medical conditions that put the patient’s life at risk, some are also done “pro-actively” without an underlying medical condition. To the Catholic Church, this is sterilization, and would not be allowed either.

            Now I will agree with you that this should be between the Dr. and the patient and as such, the hospital should not interfere. They did. It does not matter if they were purposefully set up or not. The fact remains that they are allowing religious dogma to override current medical best practices. It is one thing for a religion to promote ignorance in churches (or equivalent houses of worship), it is another for them to work toward holding a monopoly in a non religious field with the goal of imposing their religious views on those seeking/needing the non religious service.

            If a religion wants to help feed the hungry, cloth the poor, and heal the sick, I say more power to them. However, it ceases to be charity when strings are attached.

          • libertynottyranny

            So now your agenda comes out. Typical. Keep lying to yourself. The only conjecture on my part is surmising why your logic is so twisted. Clearly there is much hate in your heart towards all religious institutions (here’s my conjecture: by religious, your only disdain is for christianity).

            Your diatribe about monopolies & agendas is schizophrenic – you really should seek treatment (just be sure you go see a secular physician/institution- you don’t want to be a hypocrite).

            She pressed the issue, the hospital only responded. You pretending otherwise simply makes you appear to be detached from reality.

          • libertynottyranny

            Nice, flagging posts b/c why? B/c you want to shut up opposing views? Liberals – always decrying censorship, while being the first to censor.

            So now your agenda comes out. Typical. Keep lying to yourself. The only conjecture on my part is surmising why your logic is so twisted. Clearly there is much hate in your heart towards all religious institutions (here’s my conjecture: by religious, your only disdain is for christianity).

            Your diatribe about monopolies & religious agendas is schizophrenic. She set this situation up.

            & charity? Where does charity fit into this? You mean her charitable response of “oh, I understand, I don’t mean to put you in an uncomfortable situation. I’ll take my business elsewhere” – you mean that one? But since you brought charity into it, why are you bigots toward religion always insisting that Christian charity be handed out to you on your terms – even if those terms violate the conscience of the giver? If you don’t like the terms, don’t ask for/accept the charity (free gift, unmerited favor).

            She pressed the issue (which was not necessary nor recommended), the hospital only responded. You pretending otherwise simply makes you appear detached from reality.

  • Robert

    the united states for the first time is 12 now on the coutries noted for persecution of christians. with north korea being first. here proof again christian are being persecuted for their beliefs..

  • Chet

    One born male can never convert himself to female and vice versa, cause that’s the way creator God Almighty created one in his/her momma’s womb. Nor will one’s DNA be altered via snipping this and that off or surgically seeking to enhance other areas. A male may lose his private parts due to cancer, accident or war, for example, yet, he remains a man…

  • Tony

    WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE!!!! LGBTQAI can be Christians WE all SIN. No Sin is
    greater than another except for Denouncing The lord as God. Does,’t you
    judging a person make you less than a Christian?? That is a Sin as
    well. Ask yourselves are you a real Christian or not. ENJOY your judgement by God. It is NOT a mental Disease Like you sins are.