Trump Admin Seeks Hold on Order to Allow ‘Transgender’ Enlistment on Jan. 1

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is seeking a hold on a court order that mandated the government to allow those who identify as the opposite sex to enlist in the military beginning Jan. 1.

“Specifically, Defendants request that the court stay the portion of its preliminary injunction requiring Defendants to begin accessing transgender individuals into the military on January 1, 2018, pending a decision by the D.C. Circuit on Defendants’ appeal,” the U.S. Department of Justice wrote on Wednesday, according to The Hill.

The Trump administration says that the U.S. Armed Forces is not ready to accommodate “transgendered” persons in less than a month, and would like the order to be stayed while it appeals the ruling.

“Given the complex and multidisciplinary nature of the medical standards that need to be issued and the tens of thousands of geographically dispersed individuals that need to be trained, the military will not be adequately prepared to begin processing transgender applicants for military service by January 1, 2018, and requiring the military to do so may negatively impact military readiness,” the motion read.

The Trump administration is requesting a decision by Monday.

As previously reported, Trump announced his decision to reinstate the ban on transgenders in the military in July, advising that the issue is a distraction and would place a burden on the finances of the Armed Forces.

“After consultation with my generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military,” he tweeted. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgenders in the military would entail. Thank you.”

  • Connect with Christian News

Weeks later, five service members filed suit to challenge the ban, with the assistance of the National Center for Lesbian Rights and GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders.

“Because they identified themselves as transgender in reliance on [the government’s] earlier promise [of lifting the ban], Plaintiffs have lost the stability and certainty they had in their careers and benefits, including post-military and retirement benefits that depend on the length of their service,” the lawsuit read.

Kollar-Kotelly issued an injunction in favor of the complainants in October, writing in part, “On the record before the court, there is absolutely no support for the claim that the ongoing service of transgender people would have any negative effective on the military at all. In fact, there is considerable evidence that it is the discharge and banning of such individuals that would have such effects.”

After the government sought clarification on whether or not her order “prohibit[s] the secretary of defense from exercising his discretion to defer the January 1, 2018 effective date,” Kollar-Kotelly advised that there could be no postponement.

The U.S. Department of Justice says that it does not make sense to implement a policy that is currently under review.

“Compelling the military to implement a new accessions policy while it is simultaneously completing a comprehensive study of military service by transgender individuals that may soon result in the adoption of different accessions standards would waste significant military resources and sow unnecessary confusion among service members and applicants,” Wednesday’s motion reads.

The Pentagon told reporters this week that is “taking steps to be prepared to initiate accessions of transgender applicants” in light of the recent order, while also discussing legal options with the Department of Justice.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Nidalap

    It WOULD be nice if our military could go about its job and not have to also be a societal experimentation petri dish for the Left…

    • Hugh1

      It would be really nice if President Trump served his country when called, but he didn’t. He dodged the draft by claiming bone spurs prevented him from serving, even though he was a college athlete.

      If a transgender person chooses to serve, I say thank you. I give more credit to a transgender person who wants to serve than the draft dodger who doesn’t.

      This is no social experiment, transgender persons serve in our military with honor every day.

      • Nidalap

        You cannot change reality to suit your will any more than they can.
        The fact that it is a nonsensical experiment is plain for all to see…

        • Hugh1

          It seems a shame that being a good parent is not a requirement of having children. Conception is an act that requires no skill and little planning, however raising a child requires knowledge, skill, and intelligence. Any parent not prepared for the eventuality of a child that doesn’t meet the standards of some Christian, Muslim, political, or racial groups is not ready to conceive or raise a child.

          The child has no choice as to his or her race, physical characteristics, sexual identity, sex, height, intelligence, physical attributes, and/or handicap. Claiming that a transgender child controls his or her identity is based on ignorance and misinformation. It’s the same for all LGBT children and/or children with physical and/or mental limitations and any similar attributes.

          In summary, Christians stating how LGBT people are immoral is based on simple ignorance of the way we are born and evolve – and eventually, die. If you cannot accept how you child may be born, do the child and the world a favor and don’t have children.

          • Nidalap

            Ignorance indeed.
            Though it manifests itself in a different way, you suffer the same delusion as the “trans” crowd.
            You wish reality to be a certain way and anyone who challenges the reality you want is just “archaic” or “misinformed”.
            Sad really. In order to glom onto the civil rights movement, you have to portray them as having no choice in their own lives. Helpless pawns and victims of biology…

          • Hugh1

            With this hateful attitude, you would not be allowed to join the US military. Skin color is superficial, being trans (LGBT) is not. Maligning other human beings for who they are or how they are born is cruel, ignorant, and un-Christian.

          • Nidalap

            You illustrate my prior post…

          • Hugh1

            Actually, Nidalap, you’re living your post.

          • Nidalap

            And again….

          • Hugh1

            I see you wear glasses. Why. Take them off and be free, live your life and pray for better eyesight and let me know how this works out for you. You ignorance is transparent, and it’s depressing.

          • Nidalap

            And again…