Let Little Boys Wear Tiaras, ‘Church of England’ Tells Anglican Schools in New Guidance

(Daily Mail) Boys as young as five should be able to wear tiaras at school without criticism, teachers in Church of England schools are to be told.

Male pupils should also be free to dress up in a tutu or high heels without attracting any comment or observation, according to anti-bullying rules sent out by the Church yesterday.

The instructions for the CofE’s 4,700 schools said they should not require children to wear uniforms that “create difficulty for trans pupils.”

This appears to give official backing to schools that ban skirts to avoid discrimination against transgender children.

Continue reading this story >>


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Amos Moses – He>i

    mental illness has become airborne ……….

  • Robin Egg

    They have completely lost their minds…….

  • Nidalap

    That is the true purpose of this new “anti-bullying” campaign. It’s goal is to silence any opposition to the Perversion Movement at the school-age level…

  • Michael C

    So if a parent sends their child to a school run by the Church of England, teachers and students aren’t allowed to make fun of the child for what their parents decided to allow them to wear?

    This is what we’re complaining about?

    …and don’t most of these schools have uniforms anyway?

    • Guest✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

      Actually, no. UK press is full of stories about children being sent home from school because of haircuts, clothing, jewelry, etc. Angelina Jolie’s kid was famously expelled for a necklace he wore. It’s just perversion that’s being sanctioned.

      • Michael C

        So most of these schools do have uniforms or dress codes. What’s the “Actually, no” for? What about my comment were you disagreeing with?

        Isn’t that what I just said?

        …so if tiaras and tutus aren’t allowed, they’re not allowed for anyone. If they are allowed, they are allowed for everyone.

        …and neither the staff nor the students are permitted to make fun of how people are dressed.

        Are you upset that staff and students aren’t allowed to make fun of kids? Does this upset you?

        • Guest✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

          The “actually no” refers to the fact that you falsely assumed parents are allowed to choose what their children wear in England. They do not.

          Your last two statements show your true colours. I knew it was only a matter of time before you dropped your insipid nice guy act and showed the hardcore gay activist you are.

        • mr goody two shoes

          I’m upset there no lutheran satire video on this yet so your answer Yes. Any grand son of mine wearing a girly outfit you can bet I’m going to tease and enjoy doing it to.

          • Michael C

            I’m upset there no lutheran satire video on this yet so your answer Yes. Any grand son of mine wearing a girly outfit you can bet I’m going to tease and enjoy doing it to.

            ?

          • mr goody two shoes

            Because I had thought one of my posts was moderated. so being the spoiled brat I am I got angry and changed this one to and made it boring and bland.

          • Michael C

            Most people wouldn’t take joy in bullying their own grandchildren.

  • mr goody two shoes

    The church of england can pretend theirs no Lutheran satire videos but there is. And Lutherans can’t Waite for one on this to come out. The sissy church of england needs to be bullied by Lutherans over this stupidness.

  • mr goody two shoes

    England, s Mamas don’t let your children grow up seeing your pastor wearing a tiara while holding a tinker bell wand! Go to a celc member Lutheran church instead! . celc Lutheran info is online!

  • Trilemma

    This article is categorized as apostasy. But where’s the apostasy? What does wearing a tiara have to do with Christianity? This looks like a departure from outdated cultural norms rather than a departure from Christian doctrine.

    • Chet

      Dressing boys up with whatever to make them girl-like is stupid and wrong, period… Why would any sane mom and dad do so?

      • Trilemma

        Culture determines what is girl-like not the Bible. Culture is constantly changing. How is it apostasy to let a boy wear a tiara?

        • Chet

          Culture can proclaim any number of things to be okay; i.e., man devised homosexual marriage, abortion, premarital and extramarital sex, God doesn’t and never will as His Word is forever settled in Heaven… Dressing up a boy in girls clothing is illogical and such nonsense is harmful to impressionable little ones.

          • Trilemma

            Where does the Bible describe the clothing that only girls can wear and the clothing that only boys can wear?

          • Chet

            You might check Deuteronomy 22:5, Holy Bible. That said, why would a reasonable person even care to do so, regardless of what saith the Lord? What is the intended gain? How will doing so foment the child’s life regarding his/her normal order of things? Why not train up a child in the way he should go and when he is old he will not depart from it… There’s more than ample confusion everywhere as is nowadays…

          • Trilemma

            Deuteronomy 22:5 doesn’t describe what women’s or men’s clothing looks like. People today don’t dress like people did 3000 years ago. Styles have changed and continue to change. When I was in high school, girls were not allowed to wear pants until my senior year. When girls started wearing pants, were they violating Deuteronomy 22:5 because they were wearing boys’ clothing?

          • Chet

            This exchange of views has gone about as far as can be carried, civilly. You continue to look for approval and/or reasons to dress a child in the attire of that which would normally be suited for the other gender. I maintain girls should look like girls and boys should look like boys. And whenever possible the very best possible family for kids is where there’s a father and mother, together, and married. Have a blessed and happy Thanksgiving…

          • Trilemma

            I hope you have a blessed and happy Thanksgiving as well, Chet.

  • MCrow

    Who. Cares.

  • Amos Moses – He>i

    PARIS (AP) — Is a 13-year-old girl old enough to agree to sex with an adult? That’s a question France is asking itself as the government prepares to set a legal age for sexual consent for the first time.

    Twice in recent weeks, French courts refused to prosecute grown men for rape after they had sex with 11-year-olds because authorities couldn’t prove coercion. Amid public horror, the government is drafting a bill to say sex with children under a certain age is by definition coercive.

    Feminist groups plan a protest Tuesday to argue the age should be set at 15. Justice Minister Nicole Belloubet says 13 “is worth considering.”

    The age is just one piece of an upcoming bill on sexual violence and harassment. The bill has gained importance amid worldwide concern unleashed by the allegations against Harvey Weinstein.

    the world continues to fall into insanity …………..

    • Trilemma

      It was insane not having a legal age of consent. Sounds like they’re getting some sanity. How old was Mary when she married Joseph?

      • Chet

        The then virgin Mary gave birth to the God-man, the Lord Jesus, who ultimately became the Christ of Calvary. You’re trying to relate this miraculous event and extraordinarily circumstantial family ordeal to that of modern man with his sick and highly perverse ways?

        • Trilemma

          Back in Mary’s time, it was normal and acceptable for a woman to get married at age 13. So, why would it be wrong for France to set the legal age of consent at 15 or even 13?

          • Chet

            Circumcision once held very special prominence in one’s particular spirituality and its relevance was somewhat mischaracterized between Peter and Paul in the NT. Nowadays, we understand one can be circumcised for spiritual and health reasons, yet, it matters not a whit regarding one’s position before Holy God. Which is why we need circumcision of the heart which accompanies saving faith in the Lord Jesus Christ of Calvary… Sure doesn’t mean these days we should return to the days of old in comparison. A 13 year old girl is but a child and should be treated accordingly, especially in these evil last days…

          • Trilemma

            Circumcision has nothing to do with age of consent. If God thought it was acceptable for a 14 year old woman to be pregnant then why shouldn’t we?

          • Chet

            None of us are robots and in many nations one has freedom to do as he chooses. Nevertheless, our choices have consequences, some temporal, others eternal…

      • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

        The Christian Bible does not say how old she was or how old she was when she gave birth to Jesus. Making things up along the lines of “it was common at that time…” is adding to the Bible. Repent of your heresy at once!

    • Michael C

      What was the age of consent around the time of our nation’s founding?

      • Chet

        When the young ladies’ father said so… Else, face consequences…

    • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

      The Bible neither establishes the so-called “age of consent” nor endorses carnality in any form or any circumstance. Including between a husband and his wife. It is a duty to be carried out for the sole purpose of procreation and within the confines of marriage only. Whether these satanists (Matt 12:30) set it to 13 or 33 is irrelevant to the Christian. It’s all equally sin and all equally unacceptable.

      • Trilemma

        So, a wife past the age of child bearing cannot have sex with her husband for the sole purpose of pleasure. That’s pretty harsh.

        • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

          A Christian wife wouldn’t be interested in any manner of carnality to begin with! Does the Holy Spirit live in you? I doubt it!

  • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

    This is the same church that embraces Mooslims and homofags.

    • Trilemma

      The church should welcome all people including people who are Muslin and people who are homosexual.

      • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

        False! “Be
        ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship
        hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light
        with darkness?” 2 Cor 6:14

        • Trilemma

          You’ve taken that verse out of context and misapplied it. Jesus had no problem welcoming and being in the company of tax collectors and sinners.

          • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

            The verse is used contextually. Stop lying and remove the faggot flag from your avatar.

          • Trilemma

            2Corinthians 6:14 is talking about intimate relationships such as marriage and not friendships. 2 Cor 6;14 doesn’t prohibit a church from welcoming and having friendships with people who are Muslims or people who are homosexual.

            Are you okay with the transgender flag in my avatar?

          • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

            Faggot:

            You wouldn’t know the true message of the Christian Bible if it fell on your head falling out of a 40th storey window, you little eunuch! Who the heck the you think you are to try to lie to the Christian relative to the message contained within 2 Corinthians 6? You ignorant dolt, you will never come close to the Biblical knowledge given to the Christians by Jesus Himself within those verses of our illustrious KJV!

            FYI, 2 Cor 6 talks about interactions with pagans (a.k.a. heathens, a.k.a. satanists), including of the likes of you. It’s simple math, really–church is for Christians, not for those that go against Jesus and His Word (Matt. 12:30)! Got it?

          • Trilemma

            If an obviously homosexual couple came to visit your church Sunday morning, would you welcome them with a smile and a handshake? Would you invite them to lunch with you after church? The way you feel about people who are homosexual is the same way Jews in Jesus’s day felt about tax collectors yet Jesus welcomed and interacted with them and even dined with them.

          • Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D.

            Faggot:

            Which part of “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers” do you not get? Church is where Christians meet in fellowship and holiness. Not a place for pagans.