Michigan Lawmakers Approve Proposal Making Abortion Insurance Coverage Optional

Contract pdLANSING, MI — Legislators in Michigan have approved a proposal that essentially bars abortion insurance coverage in the state unless a woman specifically requests that the coverage be included in her plan.

As previously reported, Michigan Right to Life filed the initiative last month, submitting 315,477 signatures to the office of the Secretary of State—well above the 258,088 required. As none had filed a challenge against the proposal, it moved forward to the House and Senate for consideration.

“The people of Michigan have spoken clearly that they do not want tax dollars or health insurance premiums paying for abortion,” spokesperson Pam Sherstad told MLive. “This doesn’t have to do with legalized abortions, it just has to do with who pays for it.”

The organization asserted that the majority of Michigan residents find it offensive that they should be required to pay for another woman’s abortion.

“Polls taken during the debate on health care reform consistently showed strong opposition to the funding of abortion in health insurance plans,” it outlined on its website. “Regardless of their views regarding the legality of abortion, the great majority of voters do not want to pay for abortions with their tax dollars in public plans, or subsidize abortion through their premium dollars in private plans.”

But Planned Parenthood of Michigan expressed opposition to the initiative, stating that it served as “unprecedented government overreach into the private marketplace, not to mention the private lives of Michigan women and their families.”

On Wednesday, Senate Minority Leader Gretchen Whitmer likewise spoke out against the legislation, known as the Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act, opining that the proposal is problematic for women who are raped, since the coverage must be purchased in advance.

  • Connect with Christian News

“[This proposal] tells women who are raped … that they should have thought ahead and bought special insurance for it,” she stated. “The Republican male majority continues to ignorantly and unnecessarily weigh in on important women’s health issues that they know nothing about. … As a legislator, a lawyer and a mother of two girls, I think the fact that rape insurance is even being discussed by this body is repulsive.”

But some legislators agreed with Michigan Right to Life that residents should not be forced to pay for abortion coverage if they disagree with the procedure.

“I don’t think elective abortion should be a part of insurance,” remarked Republican Represenative Nancy Jenkins. “This doesn’t affect access to abortion. It will still be legal when this law takes effect. Who should be required to pay? Not Michigan taxpayers.”

Following debate, the Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act was ultimately approved 27-11 in the Senate and 62-47 in the House. It is expected to go into effect in March, and does not require the signature of the governor.

Currently, six states have made abortion coverage optional, available only by being purchased under a separate rider. As previously reported, the Affordable Care Act also exempts members of Christian health sharing ministries, of which there are three: Medi-ShareSamaritan Ministries and Christian Healthcare Ministries.

Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

Dear Reader, has ChristianNews.net been of benefit and a blessing to you? For many years now, the Lord has seen fit to use this small news outlet as a strong influential resource in keeping Christians informed on current events from a Biblical worldview. Despite Facebook's recent algorithm changes, which has limited our readership, and, as a result, has affected operational revenue, we continue to strive to bring you the news without compromise and to keep Christ in focus. If you have benefited from our news coverage, would you please prayerfully consider becoming a Christian News supporter by clicking here to make a one-time or monthly donation to help keep the truth widely and freely published and distributed? May Christ continue to be exalted through this work!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Sir Tainly

    Just a tad bit as to the history of abortion and just exactly who Moses was……

    From Wikipedia:
    “Earliest evidence[edit]
    The written evidence of abortion reflects the interests of class and caste. Fines are listed in the Code of Hammurabi, ca. 1760 BCE, for the crime of causing a miscarriage through assault, with the amount varying according to the social rank of the woman.[3][4] The Vedic and smrti laws of India reflect a concern with preserving the male seed of the three upper castes; and the religious courts imposed various penances for the woman or excommunication for a priest who provided an abortion.[5] The only evidence of the death penalty being mandated for abortion in the ancient laws is found in Assyrian Law, in the Code of Assura, c. 1075 BCE;[6] and this is only imposed on a woman who procures an abortion against her husband’s wishes. The first recorded evidence of induced abortion is from the Egyptian Ebers Papyrus in 1550 BCE.[7]”

    From the Bible:
    “Moses was educated in all the learning of the Egyptians, and he was a man of power in words and deeds.
    – New American Standard Version (1995)


    Moses was raised as a Prince in Egypt. Do you think that growing up as a Prince that he somehow missed what history shows plainly, that there were ways to end pregnancy?

    Maybe Moses was that stupid, maybe he had the blinders on!?——I DON’T THINK SO. He knew that the Egyptians had ways to end unfortunate pregnancies, he was raised in the Egyptian court as the Prince.
    Maybe their is a reason why Moses and/or God did not write a statute specifically outlawing abortions? You have not ONE commandment, law, or statute as to abortions.

    Even if you think that Moses somehow missed being taught what all the rest of the Egyptian Nobility knew, you certainly don’t think that God missed it do you?

    You have not one reason to think from God’s Word, or nature itself IMO, to take the choice away from the one in charge of the pregnancy the woman. And the woman being free, has every right to work it out with her hubby, or whoever she wants. But you have no right to legislate her choices for her.

    So if you see that God could have written a law concerning abortion as most of the contemporary cultures already had, but did not; maybe God gave the choice to the woman and not her employers.