Couple Refuses to Abort Unborn Baby with Two Faces

BabySYDNEY — A couple in Australia is refusing their doctor’s recommendations to obtain an abortion after they discovered that their unborn baby has a rare condition that results in the development of two brains and two faces on the same skull.

Renee Young and Simon Howie have seven children, and were excited about their new pregnancy when they were informed last month that their unborn baby, a girl, had craniofacial duplication, also known as disprospus. The baby has a strong heartbeat, and is perfectly normal other than her face.

There are only 35 cases of the condition known in the world, and there are no known living survivors of craniofacial duplication. The abnormality is believed to result from the failure of a fertilized egg to completely split into two separate babies early in the pregnancy.

Some have remarked that the couple’s baby may not survive birth, and if she lives, medical costs will be exorbitant. According to Renee and Simon, doctors urged them to obtain an abortion “because it (the child) would be looked upon by the public as a freak.” They were told that if the child survived, she would have a non-existent social life and and would have a hard time making friends.

“[It was] difficult,” Renee told A Current Affair when asked how she reacted to the news that her daughter had two faces. “It has hard to take it.”

But Renee and Simon said that they wanted to give their baby a chance at life and enjoy their daughter for as long as they can.

“We both decided that we were going through with it,” Renne said. “We believe that everything happens for a reason, so whatever happens, happens.”

  • Connect with Christian News

“I’m still going to give birth whether it’s now, ten weeks or fourteen [weeks that we get to have with the baby],” she added. “To me, it really doesn’t make a difference.”

When asked if they had a moral objection to abortion, they said that they don’t believe in ending the lives of unborn children simply because they have a disability.

“It’d be the same as being a child with autism or down syndrome,” Simon asserted. “I don’t believe in terminating the baby if it’s healthy and growing fine, and everything is going to [according to the] plan.”

The couple remarked that they didn’t care what others thought of their child—their daughter would be surrounded by family members who love her.

“If I only get two days with the baby, I only get two days with the baby,” Renne stated. “At least I have some time with it.”

The family lives on welfare, but refuses to end their child’s life simply because of the challenges that they face.

The baby is expected to be born in July and will have a natural delivery, as opposed to a C-section.

Photo: A Current Affair

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Julie, could it be possible that they can afford these children?

  • shannon

    To those that comment about “us” having to support them because they’re on welfare, “us” Americans don’t have to. They live in Sydney, Australia. Regardless of where they live, they are living by faith. Whether the baby lives or doesn’t (which is up to God) they are doing what they believe is right. When faced with a test of faith like that I commend them for their decision. God has to have something (or someone in this case) to produce a miracle. This baby could live a full life and be a force to be reckoned with for God. No one knows what God has in store for this child. Why not have faith and trust that God knows what He’s doing instead of trying to hold Him back and suppress Him? Even if the baby doesn’t live long God will use that child in some way. I commend these people because of their faith and hope regardless of their financial situation.

  • Julie

    Nancy since the article states that they are on welfare, I’m guessing no they cannot afford them. More kids means more assistance. Also classically people that live on the governments dime are living in poverty. What kind of life is that for a child let alone seven.