Arizona Lawmakers Pass Bill Protecting Religious Rights of Business Owners

Open sign pdPHOENIX — Lawmakers in Arizona passed a bill this week that seeks to protect the religious rights of business owners and shield them from unlawful discrimination lawsuits.

HB 2153 cleared the Arizona House of Representatives on Thursday 33-27, amending sections 41‑1493 and 41‑1493.01 of the state code pertaining to the free exercise of religion. The bill broadens the definition of a religious entity to include businesses and associations, and prohibits state officials from burdening the entity’s free exercise of religion without the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government interest.

The bill is modeled after the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), passed in the 1990’s, but serves to ensure that Arizona protects the right to religious conviction without punishment. The RFRA only applies on a federal level and does not pertain to state action.

While the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona (ACLU) and other groups have condemned the legislation as paving the way for unlawful discrimination against minorities, sponsor Steve Yarbrough (R-Chandler) said that the measure conversely protects religious business owners against bigotry.

“This bill is not about allowing discrimination,” he said on the Senate floor Wednesday. “This bill is about preventing discrimination against people who are clearly living out their faith.”

Yarbrough’s version of the bill passed the Senate 17-13 before moving on to the House of Representatives the following day.

“As we witness hostility towards people of faith grow like never before, we must take this opportunity to speak up for religious liberty,” said the Center for Arizona Policy. “The great news is that [this bill] protects your right to live and work according to your faith.”

  • Connect with Christian News

As previously reported, concerns have been mounting over the past year after lawsuits and civil discrimination complaints have been filed against religious business owners who have declined certain orders due to their Christian convictions. The majority of the cases have centered around the issue of homosexual “marriage.”

While none of the business owners have denied service to homosexuals in general, all have stated that certain jobs would equate to personal participation in the ceremony or celebration—which would violate their conscience. Florists, bakers and bed and breakfast owners nationwide have faced discrimination charges for declining the orders, and one photographer from New Mexico is currently appealing her case to the U.S. Supreme Court after being told that she must “compromise” her beliefs to facilitate requests to shoot homosexual ceremonies.

In addition to protecting business owners’ views on marriage, the Center for Arizona Policy noted that the bill could also protect businesses that have fought for their religious rights to conscience surrounding Obamacare. Many businesses have declined to provide insurance coverage for abortifacient drugs due to their Christian beliefs.

“People don’t forfeit their religious freedom rights simply because they go to work or start a business,” the organization stated. “The Constitution doesn’t only guarantee our freedom to worship but our freedom to practice and promote our faith. Americans don’t have to leave their faith and convictions at their church door; we have the right to carry it with us in all aspects of our lives.”

The bill is now headed to the desk of Governor Jan Brewer, who is likely to sign the legislation into law.

Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

Dear Reader, has been of benefit and a blessing to you? For many years now, the Lord has seen fit to use this small news outlet as a strong influential resource in keeping Christians informed on current events from a Biblical worldview. Despite Facebook's recent algorithm changes, which has limited our readership, and, as a result, has affected operational revenue, we continue to strive to bring you the news without compromise and to keep Christ in focus. If you have benefited from our news coverage, would you please prayerfully consider becoming a Christian News supporter by clicking here to make a one-time or monthly donation to help keep the truth widely and freely published and distributed? May Christ continue to be exalted through this work!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Servant

    Fortunately and thankfully, when the Lord Jesus returns to clean up this corrupted planet the homosexuals will no longer be able to get their way. God WILL in fact have the last and final word. Like murder, idol worship, greed and other traits of our existence, homosexuality IS a sin, and may the Lord have mercy on us all.

    • Anne

      Do you consider eating a fig a sin? Do we ‘clean up this corrupted planet’ of figs? Beacause you make a fuss about the homosexual community, and yet there are more passages in the Bible condemning figs.

  • Stogumber

    Jesus ate with the pro-Roman tax collectors (people understandably hated and despised by most other Jews). But as far as I know he did not help them collecting taxes. And did he really have sex with the prostitutes?

    I suppose that everyone – even Daniel Lambert or Tim Raynor – comes to a point where he says: I’m finished – I can’t take part further in THIS activities without hurting my conscience.” (Take all boycotts in history.)

    Thus, the important question at this moment is wether we accept that different people have different consciences – different points where they say “I’m finished” (take the present debate about boycotts against Israeli institutions). But nobody should be enforced to go further than he can without hurting his conscience.

    I see that the law can be misused for simple bickering against homosexuals. On the other hand I think that the homosexual community is quite able to create its own resources.

  • Lesli Spice

    This is the time for repentance. Everyone who loves Jesus and puts his will over their will, and loves him so much they put him first, confess with their mouth that Jesus is Lord.

  • Sir Tainly

    For me it is all about “intentions” and their relative moral worth.
    I am all for Christian business owners being able to make their own choices, unless it effectively blacklists people who have the right to choose for themselves as well.
    For instance it wasn’t too long ago that their were many “pseudo-Biblical” justifications that were floating around among the more stinky winds of doctrine that attempted to justify racism. If some neo-nazi skinhead tried to use this type of law to persecute a mixed race couple, I’d either throw the law on the scrap heap or ammend it as fast as humanly possible.