Supreme Court Allows Ruling to Stand: AZ Can’t Strip Planned Parenthood of Medicaid Funding

Planned_parenthood_supportersWASHINGTON — The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case regarding whether officials in Arizona may strip Planned Parenthood of Medicaid funding, allowing a lower court ruling to stand.

As previously reported, U.S. District Judge Neil Wake, appointed in 2004 by George W. Bush under the recommendation of Senators John McCain and Jon Kyl, issued a temporary injunction against a new state law surrounding the matter in October 2012 while the matter moved forward in the courts.

While Arizona already bars federal funds from being used for abortions, the new law served as a supplemental measure to ensure that no funds would indirectly go to abortion providers. It prohibited Medicaid funds, which cover low-income families, from going to organizations that offer family planning services. There are thirteen Planned Parenthood locations in the state.

“This is a common-sense law that tightens existing state regulations and closes loopholes in order to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not used to fund abortions, whether directly or indirectly,” Governor Jan Brewer said in a statement following the official signing in May 2012. “By signing this measure into law, I stand with the majority of Americans who oppose the use of taxpayer funds for abortion.”

In his ruling, Judge Wake stated that Planned Parenthood shouldn’t be denied funding simply because it performs abortions, and said that the other services the organization offers should qualify Planned Parenthood to receive Medicaid compensation.

“Simply put, a state’s determination of whether a provider is qualified to perform Medicaid services must at least be related to Medicaid services,” he wrote in his order. “The fact that [Planned Parenthood] performs legally protected abortions does not affect their ability to perform family planning services for Medicaid patients.”

Last August, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Wake’s ruling, stating that Arizona officials are bound by federal law to provide Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood.

  • Connect with Christian News

“[The free-choice-of-provider provision appears in a list of mandatory requirements that apply to all state Medicaid plans,” the court outlined. “For all these reasons, the free-choice-of-provider provision unambiguously requires that states participating in the Medicaid program allow covered patients to choose among the family planning medical practitioners they could use were they paying out of their own pockets.”

The court also asserted that the state has not shown that Planned Parenthood is “unqualified” to provide other services outside of abortions and therefore receive Medicaid reimbursement.

In November, Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne appealed the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, but on Monday, its nine justices declined to to take the case, allowing the Ninth Circuit decision to stand.

The Christian legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which had been asked by Horne to assist with the appeal, expressed its disappointment with the court’s inaction.

“Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize the work of abortionists. Arizona should be free to enforce its public interest against the taxpayer funding of abortion and in favor of the best health care for women, which is what this law sought to do,” stated Senior Counsel Steven Aden. “We are disappointed that the Supreme Court did not decide to weigh in on that principle. Arizonans deserve the best policies and laws possible to protect both their money and their health.”

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Mary Waterton

    A government that can force you to murder babies is a government that can force you to wear 666. Christians had better grow a spine quickly because it’s only a matter of time. The god of this world is money and they expect you to worship their god. But you have more power over their god than you realize. With the banking system in the fragile condition that it is, if Christians withdrew their every dollar and held onto it in the form of cash, then suddenly their power over you would become very weak indeed.

    • Sir Tainly

      Our government is not forcing anybody to do anything in regards to their own choices, the most common people around these heaaah paaahts that try to force anyone to do anything are that abolitionist pro-lifers.

      It “IS” a matter of choice Mary.

      Now if we were forcing abortions as the mainland Chinese government has done regularly I’d probably be screaming about that as loud as anyone.