NY Man Charged With ‘Abortional Act’ for Forcing Woman to Swallow Morning-After Pill

PfeifferROSENDALE, N.Y. — A New York man that works as an anesthesiologist has been charged with committing an “abortional act” and other crimes for forcing a woman to swallow the morning-after pill after she told him that she was pregnant.

Thomas Pfeiffer, 44, is facing charges of second-degree strangulation, second-degree assault and second-degree abortion following the incident this week.

According to reports, police received a “no voice” 911 call on Wednesday coming from a town just south of Albany. The woman, who is not being named, told police that she had called Pfeiffer to tell him that she was pregnant after receiving a positive home pregnancy test. Pfeiffer then purchased the morning-after pill over the counter at a local pharmacy and sought to force the woman to ingest it.

A struggle ensued, and Pfieffer allegedly strangled the woman as they argued over the matter. The woman sustained injuries to her throat and neck, and was treated at a local hospital.

Pfieffer was taken into custody that evening, and remains behind bars on $50,000 bail. Police have yet to release information on the woman’s relationship to Pfeiffer.

In New York, “[a] person is guilty of abortion in the second degree when he commits an abortional act upon a female, unless such abortional act is justifiable pursuant to Subdivision 3 of Section 125.05.” But the cited section states that “[a]n abortional act is justifiable when committed upon a female with her consent by a duly licensed physician acting (a) under a reasonable belief that such is necessary to preserve her life, or (b) within 24 weeks from the commencement of her pregnancy.”

The incident occurs just days after another New York man was convicted of second degree murder after he allegedly admitted to killing his teenage girlfriend because she told him that she was pregnant and refused his demand to abort. As previously reported, Christian Ferdinand, 22, was found guilty on Monday after a jury took only an hour to deliberate the case.

  • Connect with Christian News

Ferdinand had met Shaniesha Forbes, 14, on Facebook in 2012 and the two hooked up. In a text message some time later, Forbes told Ferdinand that she was pregnant with his child, but said that she could not obtain an abortion because her mother is “religious.”

“[A]re you serious?” he texted back, according to court records. “Kill that [expletive].”

In January 2013, Ferdinand and Forbes spent time together at his cousin’s house, and as they sat on the sofa together, Ferdinand snapped as Forbes continued to speak about her alleged pregnancy and insisted to keep the baby. He held a leather pillow over her face until she stopped breathing.

Prosecutors state that Ferdinand then placed the teen’s body in a suitcase and took it to Gerritson Beach in Brooklyn two days later, where he set the teen on fire and tossed the suitcase into the water. But the suitcase washed up on shore days later.

Ironically, a medical examiner has since declared that Forbes had not been pregnant after all. Ferdinand faces up to 25 years behind bars for his crimes.

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Neiman

    There are several legitimate criminal charges here, no doubt this fellow should face some jail time; but, as abortion is no longer a crime, I am at a loss to see how he can be charged with anything that uses the term “abortion.” According to current liberal thought there was no human being in the womb, so no charge of killing a human being could be involved, right. Thus what is an abortional act?

    For me, he is guilty of murdering a child in the First Degree, he killed a human being plain and simple. He is guilty of a capital crime. Yet, as the State does not call that baby in her womb a human being and abortion is legal, I am struggling with what he is charged with when they say an “abortional act.”

    • AS68

      It’s an “abortional act” because the woman did not give her consent.

      • Neiman

        Nope, try again! It is an abortional act when she gives her consent too. So, when she agrees why isn’t she guilty of “an abortional act?”

    • CrossedtheTiber

      I agree with you on this 100%. This man should be charged with 1st degree murder. He is guilty of murdering a child.

  • Demopublicrat

    This is actually a copyright infringement case, planned parenthood wants their “cut”.

  • Sad…

  • robertzaccour

    He’s guilty of murder.