U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case of Murderer Seeking Sex Change Operation

KosilekWASHINGTON — The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear appeal from a male convicted murderer who is seeking a sex change operation behind bars and to be transferred to a women’s prison facility.

As previously reported, Robert Kosilek has been serving a life sentence since the early 1990’s after being convicted of murdering his wife Cheryl. While in incarceration in an all-male prison, Kosilek decided to become a woman, and began going by the name “Michelle.” He also received hormone treatments so that he could start to feel more feminine.

Kosilek first sued the Massachusetts Department of Corrections in 2000, but the court only declared that the man had gender identity disorder, and would not go so far as to grant him a sex change operation. He sued again in 2005 after he stated that the hormones he was taking were not enough.

According to court documents, Kosilek “attempt[ed] to castrate himself and attempt[ed] twice to kill himself while incarcerated.”

U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf, nominated by then-President Ronald Reagan in 1985 and confirmed by a Republican majority, ordered the state in 2012 to pay for Kosilek’s operation. Wolf outlined that taxpayers should foot the bill for the $20,000 surgery, because denial of the operation would equate to a violation of the 8th Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

“[Kosilek is] a man who truly believes that he is a female cruelly trapped in a male body,” Wolf wrote in the 126-page decision. “This belief has caused Kosilek to suffer intense mental anguish.”

“[S]urgery is the only adequate treatment,” he continued. “[T]here is no less intrusive means to correct the prolonged violation of Kosilek’s Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care.”

  • Connect with Christian News

The Massachusetts Department of Corrections (DOC) appealed the ruling to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and in January 2014, the three-judge panel upheld Wolf’s conclusion. But the decision was then appealed to the full bench en banc, and in December, the court overturned Wolf’s order 3-2, finding that the DOC did not violate Kosilek’s rights in granting the surgery and had valid concerns about safety ramifications as he wished to be transferred to a women’s prison post-op.

“[W]e conclude that the district court erred and that the care provided to Kosilek by the DOC does not violate the Eighth Amendment,” wrote Judge Juan R. Torruella, also nominated by Reagan, on behalf of the majority. “The district court … erred by substituting its own beliefs for those of multiple medical experts.”

“The DOC’s security report reflected that significant concerns would also arise from housing a formerly male inmate—with a criminal history of extreme violence against a female domestic partner—within a female prison population containing high numbers of domestic violence survivors,’’ he also noted.

The panel then reversed Wolf’s order and remanded the case back to the district court with instructions to dismiss Kosilek’s case. Judges O. Rogeriee Thompson and William J. Kayatta Jr. dissented.

But the ruling was then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case on Tuesday without comment, leaving the appeals court’s denial intact.

“The treatment of Michelle has been cruel and unusual,” Kosilek attorney Joseph Sulman remarked to the Boston Herald. “The DOC’s behavior has been abominable as they have repeatedly defied their own experts in their eagerness to deny her desperately needed medical attention.”

The Massachusetts DOC said that it agrees with the court.

“We are satisfied with the court’s decision,’’ spokesman Darren Duarte told the Boston Globe.

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Bobby Mae

    I just came to read the ignorant comments about homosexuals in regards to this article.

    • FoJC_Forever

      No, you came to lie and chide those who would tell the Truth about the evils of homosexuality.

  • No murderer should be allowed to have anything. Makes no sense. He should be locked in jail to repent for his sins

  • FoJC_Forever

    That this “legal issue” is even being entertained by the legal system is proof of its failure in America.

  • Faithwalker

    This gentleman appears to be as narcissistic as they come. Facts: He was convicted of murdering his wife, sentenced to life without parole, determined that he is no longer a male, has decided he wants to live as a female, demands to be reassigned to the women’s section of the prison, and tried to castrate himself and commit suicide. On top of that, he thinks our taxpayer dollars should pay for his sexual reassignment. His line of thinking is totally egotistical, narcissistic, and maniacal. He is need of a redeemer. Solution: To pray for him that he will accept the Lord Jesus Christ into his heart for deliverance of the darkness that is enshrouding his heart and mind,

  • Akinkunmi

    Quite unfortunate that this case is entertained in the first instance.