Judge Orders Portland Police to Stop Using Maine Civil Rights Act to Target Pro-Life Speech

March-compressed
Photo Credit: Facebook/Donna Hebert

PORTLAND, Maine — A federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction to a Portland pastor who asserted that he was being unlawfully targeted by police outside of a Planned Parenthood facility for his pro-life preaching.

U.S. District Judge Nancy Torresen, appointed to the bench by Barack Obama, ruled on Monday that police may not use a noise ordinance in the Maine Civil Rights Act against Andrew March of Cell 53 Church and others who reach abortion-minded women in Monument Square.

“The case presents the difficult question of whether a state law providing protection to women seeking access to constitutionally protected health care violates the First Amendment rights of an individual who wishes to voice his opposition to abortion on a public sidewalk,” Torresen wrote. “I conclude that it does.”

Police had confronted March and others last year to advise that their voices could be heard by staff and clients inside of the Planned Parenthood facility, and told them to keep it down. But officers did nothing when those in favor of Planned Parenthood could likewise be heard inside of the building.

“Continued enforcement of a content-based restriction on speech would result in irreparable harm to the Plaintiff,” Torreson stated.

She said that there are other ways to keep order on the public sidewalk, as police “can further their interests of maintaining order and protecting individual patients through the criminal code, most obviously the disorderly conduct and harassment statutes.”

The Maine Civil Rights Act states that after receiving a warning, it is illegal for a person to intentionally interfere with a medical procedure at an abortion facility. Torreson found that the “intent to interfere” portion of the law would pertain to the content of the speech, and would therefore only relate to pro-life speech, which would therefore be an unconstitutional content-based restriction.

  • Connect with Christian News

“While I understand the defendants’ frustration with the shifting sands of First Amendment jurisprudence, avenues are still open to protect the interests on both sides of this debate,” she wrote.

March had filed suit in November after Maine Attorney General Janet Mills, a pro-abortion Democrat, filed a civil rights lawsuit to keep Brian Ingalls, 26, from standing within 50 feet of the Planned Parenthood facility—or any Planned Parenthood location in Maine. Ingalls is an elder at March’s church.

Mills alleged in her lawsuit that Ingalls spoke too loudly on Oct. 23, 2015 about “murdering babies, aborted babies’ blood and Jesus” while preaching outside of Planned Parenthood to the point that his pro-life pleas could be heard in the room where examinations take place.

It is believed that Mills’ suit will likely be dismissed due to Torreson’s ruling.

“I think this is effectively the end of the state’s case against Mr. Ingalls,” attorney Stephen Whiting told the Bangor Daily News. “How can he be fined for violating a statute that [in essence] has been declared unconstitutional?”

However, a final ruling has yet to be issued in the case as the injunction was preliminary.

“The ruling is important in two immediately significant ways,” Kate Oliveri, an attorney with the Thomas More Law Center in Michigan, told the Portland Press Herald. “First, it means that Pastor March is likely to succeed on the merits when the case goes to summary judgment or trial. In other words, the court found, based on the evidence and legal arguments presented in the briefing and at oral argument, that the noise portion of the Maine Civil Rights Act is an unconstitutional restriction on free-speech rights.”

“Second, it means that Pastor March and other peaceful pro-life speakers can preach and pray on the public sidewalk without fear of prosecution under the noise portion of the Maine Civil Rights Act,” she said.

Timothy Feeley, a spokesman for the Maine attorney general’s office, said that an appeal of Torreson’s injunction is being considered.

“It is the attorney general’s responsibility to defend the constitutionality of state statutes whenever reasonably appropriate,” he told reporters. “The office continues to believe that this statute, carefully drafted and supported by diverse interest groups, is a reasonable accommodation of free speech.”


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • WorldGoneCrazy

    “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

    “He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetuate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.” — Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

    “Christianity stands or falls with its revolutionary protest against violence, arbitrariness and pride of power and with its plea for the weak. Christians are doing too little to make these points clear rather than too much. Christendom adjusts itself far too easily to the worship of power. Christians should give more offense, shock the world far more, than they are doing now. Christians should take a stronger stand in favor of the weak rather than considering first the possible right of the strong.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

    • Robert

      The christian church stands or falls on the doctrine of justification How God forgives us through faith in Jesus blood and righteousness God forgives us for His dear Son sake who lived perfect for us and died for our sin.
      “If the doctrine of justification is lost the whole christian doctrine is lost” .. Martin Luther The doctrine of justification. Romans 5:1,2

      • WorldGoneCrazy

        I do not worship Luther, or Calvin, but Jesus. Sins of omission, per Bonhoeffer’s quote, are well-established:

        “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

        “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

        “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

        “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” – Matthew 25:41-46

        • Robert

          Bonhoeffer perhaps

          he never understood that Those that trust in Jesus and his forgivness will be the ones that feed the poor look after the sick etc etc.And will also be the ones who stand in Jesus perfect record of doing all good things perfectly. IT those that want nothing to do with God and how he forgives or the heaven Jesus won for them . That will face a different eternity with their master Satan
          Since they did not want Christ or the forgivness he won for them on the cross

  • WorldGoneCrazy

    “Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter. If you say, “But we knew nothing about this, does not He who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not He who guards your life know it? Will He not repay everyone for what they have done?” — Proverbs 24:11-12

  • WorldGoneCrazy

    “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ — Jesus (Matthew 25:45)

  • james blue

    So the cops can still respond if there are complaints of harassment using the criminal code instead of the Main civil rights act. Seems to me nothing has been gained or lost here.

    • Robert

      confessional Lutheran cops better not be protecting the murdering.of innocent children I’n clinics.

  • Mellow Fellow

    And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed. — Numbers 5:27-28

  • Robert

    My Lutheran chuch synod pastor said that if Any one state or other wise is actively taking the Life of a little innocent child we can protect that innocent child with the force necessary we also can protect our own lives while protecting the innocent child lives after words he said we better get out of their because other wise were going to prision if the cops get a hold of us. What we can’t do is preemptive killings.the killing would have to be the last resort as the person is murdering the child and it was the only way to stop them.