New York Attorney General Files Federal Lawsuit to Stop Anti-Abortion Proponents

Photo Credit: New York Attorney General’s Office

NEW YORK — The attorney general of New York has filed a lawsuit against 14 pro-life individuals that he claims have been “harassing” abortion-minded mothers outside of a local abortion facility.

“The law guarantees women the right to control their own bodies and access the reproductive health care they need, without obstruction,” Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said in a statement. “We’ll do what it takes to protect those rights for women across New York.”

The pro-lifers are reportedly members of various churches and Christian ministries, such as Church @ the Rock, Helpers of God’s Precious Infants, Bright Dawn Ministries and Grace Baptist Church. Schneiderman states that every Saturday for the past five years, the pro-lifers have gathered outside of the Choices Women’s Medical Center in Jamaica and hold photographs of aborted babies.

Some, he claims, approach vehicles when they arrive and lean into the window to offer literature, or follow patients closely on their way into the building, at times handing a pamphlet to the accompanying child and asking him or her to “give this to your mommy to read.”

Schneiderman asserts that sometimes there is physical contact or crowding in order to get the person’s attention to hand them the information.

He further contends that the pro-lifers are “disseminating false information concerning the safety risks of an abortion in an effort to deter patients from going through with the procedure” and are “intentionally propagating false information about the connection between suicide and abortion in order to impede women from accessing such care.”

One of the pamphlets Schneiderman specifically notes, and claims to be deceptive, reads, “We know you are probably upset and confused. To save the life of your baby, the laminaria (seaweed sticks) can still be removed. Please don’t do anything now that will hurt your child because you will later regret it.”

  • Connect with Christian News

He also takes issue with the verbal speech of the pro-lifers, who he says call out “vitriolic” statements such as, “Don’t go in there; they will convince you to kill your baby—that’s how they make money,” “You have the blood of dead babies on your hands” and “They are killing babies above your heads.”

“Defendant Randall Doe, while raising an enlarged image of a purportedly aborted fetus, harasses patients and closely follows them within nine feet of the clinic door, telling them that they will regret killing their child for the rest of their lives,” the lawsuit states.

“Defendants Ronald George, Randall Doe, Anne Kaminsky, Angela Braxton, and Jasmine LaLande loudly and falsely inform patients entering the clinic, on a regular basis, that there are higher rates of suicide, breast and ovarian cancer, and schizophrenia among individuals who have had abortions, in order to impede them from obtaining such care,” it reads.

The legal challenge additionally states that because the pro-lifers film their time on the sidewalk, some mothers fear that their identities might be made public.

“Many are concerned that the defendants will post information about their visits on social media networks and that their relatives or colleagues will learn that they had an abortion,” it states. “A patient’s fear of having her abortion publicized was triggered when Defendant Patricia Musco recognized her and yelled her name.”

“The tactics used to harass and menace Choices’ patients, families, volunteers, and staff are not only horrifying—they’re illegal,” Schneiderman said in a statement. “The law guarantees women the right to control their own bodies and access the reproductive health care they need, without obstruction. We’ll do what it takes to protect those rights for women across New York.”

He is seeking a declaration that the pro-lifers are in violation of state and city clinic access laws, and desires for the court to issue an order creating a 16-foot buffer zone around the abortion facility.

As previously reported, in an introductory lecture to his course on obstetrics in 1854, Philadelphia doctor Hugh Lennox Hodge explained that if a woman were to come to a medical doctor in pursuit of an abortion, “he must, as it were, grasp the conscience of his weak and erring patient and let her know in language not to be misunderstood that she is responsible to her Creator for the life of the being within her.”

“The procuring abortion is ‘a base and unmanly act,’” Hodge also said, quoting in part text from a court ruling of his day. “It is a crime against the natural feelings of man, against the welfare and safety of females, against the peace and prosperity of society, against the divine command ‘Thou shalt not kill.’ It is murder.”

Abortion is Murder from I’ll Be Honest on Vimeo.


Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

Dear Reader, has been of benefit and a blessing to you? For many years now, the Lord has seen fit to use this small news outlet as a strong influential resource in keeping Christians informed on current events from a Biblical worldview. Despite Facebook's recent algorithm changes, which has limited our readership, and, as a result, has affected operational revenue, we continue to strive to bring you the news without compromise and to keep Christ in focus. If you have benefited from our news coverage, would you please prayerfully consider becoming a Christian News supporter by clicking here to make a one-time or monthly donation to help keep the truth widely and freely published and distributed? May Christ continue to be exalted through this work!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Robert

    Hope fully some day soon this New York AG will be a arrested and put to death his own miserable self. for Crimes against children that directly led to their deaths.

    • Sisyphus

      Hmm, thought you were against murder.

  • WorldGoneCrazy-NotMurderedYet

    SCOTUS unanimously struck down buffer zones in June of 2014.

    The New York AG should be removed from office for such a clear violation of basic 1st Amendment rights.

    • SFBruce

      Not exactly. Yes, SCOTUS did strike down Massachusetts’ buffer zone law in 2014, as you claim. However, in 1994, SCOTUS upheld part of a Florida clinic’s buffer zone in Madsen v. Women’s Health Center. Anyone interested can read more online, so I won’t go into detail here. But I will say that balancing free speech liberties against other constitutional rights, such as the right to abortion, can be complicated. I know that there are significant numbers of people who equate abortion with murder, but, as a practical matter, I just don’t think you’re likely to change hearts and minds by harassing women who probably already feel they are in the midst of a crisis.

      • WorldGoneCrazy-NotMurderedYet

        The 2014 ruling supersedes the 1994 ruling.

        The “buffer zone” approved of in 1994 was on private, not public, property. The ones struck down were similar to those in the 2014 ruling.

        “right to abortion”

        There is no right to do a wrong.

        “I just don’t think you’re likely to change hearts and minds by harassing women”

        Pointing out that abortion is wrong is NOT harassment. You should look up the legal definition of what harassment is some time – it is quite serious and much more than speech which might cause a snowflake to melt.

        Furthermore, I have 52 babies and their moms in the last 18 months who disagree with you in regard to “changing hearts and minds.” They are alive today ONLY because somebody on our sidewalk cared enough to stand there and offer their moms an option other than death.

        “women who probably already feel they are in the midst of a crisis.”

        Oh, but paying someone to kill your child SHOULD be a difficult decision, no? What a crisis killing the innocent should be!

        “So we ask, yet again: if there’s nothing wrong with abortion, then why is loving it something to be embarrassed about? Is there any other principle or cause from which activists feel a constant need to distance themselves while championing it?” — Calvin Freiburger

        • Ambulance Chaser

          “There is no right to do a wrong.”

          The Supreme Court found otherwise. Perhaps you’ve never heard of Roe v. Wade?

          • WorldGoneCrazy-NotMurderedYet

            Thank you for admitting that abortion is a wrong. 🙂

            Someday, everyone will know what you just stated and will look back at those on the wrong side of history – and the deaths of 60 million innocents – with the same disdain that we know look back on slavers and their apologists.

          • Ambulance Chaser

            So, are you going to respond to what I said, or not?

  • Croquet_Player

    I think this headline is misleading. They are not trying to “Stop” protesters, which implies removing them altogether. They are trying to move them back 16 feet, as it states in the article. So perhaps the headline should read “New York Attorney General Files Federal Lawsuit to Move Anti Abortion Proponents”.

  • MCrow

    I will admit I was only skimming until I got to the end was trying to figure out why the language was out of date…then I saw it was from 1854…

    Agree or disagree, can you update your medical sources to something more recent than 150 years ago? We’ve had a lot of medical discoveries since then

  • Grace Kim Kwon

    Mothers should be educated not to kill children but to give birth and nurture the children. The only right thing. God gave life. Genesis 9.

  • MCrow

    …so asking for medical experts from after the 1800s gets my post deleted…hmmm