NC Commission Appeals Ruling Against Exclusively Christian Prayers to U.S. Supreme Court

SALISBURY, N.C. — A board of commissioners in North Carolina has presented its prayer case to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the nation’s highest court to hear its appeal of a Fourth Circuit ruling that declared that it was unconstitutional for prayers presented during the commission’s meetings to be exclusively Christian.

“Thousands of legislative bodies with tens of thousands of members and millions of citizens across nine states are now subject to conflicting legal regimes regarding one of the nation’s oldest traditions,” the petition, filed by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) on behalf of the Rowan County Board of Commissioners, reads.

It notes that while the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the primarily Christian prayer practice in July, the full Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a separate case last month that commissioners have a right to pray as they believe, even if that means that the entire board identifies as Christian.

“Legislatures in the remaining states must hazard a guess as to which approach to take,” ADF writes in light of the conflicting rulings. “As in [the U.S. Supreme Court ruling surrounding the] Town of Greece, this court’s review is required to resolve this intractable conflict on a recurring, exceptionally important issue of First Amendment law.”

As previously reported, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and ACLU of North Carolina Legal Foundation (ACLU-NCLF) had filed suit against the Rowan County commissioners in March 2013, complaining that their invocations have asserted that “there is only one way to salvation, and that is Jesus Christ,” and thank the Lord for the “virgin birth,” the “cross at Calvary” and “the resurrection.”

“I want my local government to be open and welcoming to people of all beliefs,” Nan Lund, a local resident who was among three plaintiffs named in the suit, stated in a news release announcing the legal challenge. “But when officials begin a public meeting with prayers that are specific to only one religious viewpoint, I feel unwelcome and excluded.”

In July 2013, federal Judge James A. Beaty Jr., nominated to the bench by then-President Bill Clinton, sided with the ACLU and the three complainants, ordering the commissioners to end their Christian prayer practice while the case moves forward in court.

  • Connect with Christian News

Two years later, Beaty issued his final decision, declaring the prayers predominantly in Jesus’ name to be unconstitutional.

“The practice fails to be nondiscriminatory, entangles government with religion, and over time, establishes a pattern of prayers that tends to advance the Christian faith of the elected commissioners at the expense of any religious affiliation unrepresented by the majority,” he wrote.

Beaty pointed to the 2014 Supreme Court ruling in Greece v. Galloway, which approved city council prayers in Greece, New York that were predominantly—but not solely—Christian. Beaty asserted that Rowan County’s practice was different because the prayers were only Christian since its commissioners all identify as Christians.

However, in September 2016, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals used Greece v. Galloway to uphold the commission’s prayers. It disagreed with Beaty’s interpretation of the high court decision.

“In essence, the district court treated the Supreme Court’s jurisprudential silence on lawmaker-led prayer as conclusively excluding legislators from being permissible prayer-givers to their own legislative bodies,” wrote Judge G. Steven Agee, nominated to the bench by then-President George W. Bush.

“On a broader level, and more importantly, the very ‘history and tradition’ anchoring the Supreme Court’s holding in Town of Greece underscores a long-standing practice not only of legislative prayer generally but of lawmaker-led prayer specifically. Opening invocations offered by elected legislators have long been accepted as a permissible form of religious observance,” he said.

The ACLU consequently appealed to the full Fourth Circuit of 15 judges, which agreed to hear the case en banc. The court ruled 10-5 in July that while the commission may present prayers during public meetings, they cannot be exclusively Christian.

“The great promise of the Establishment Clause is that religion will not operate as an instrument of division in our nation,” wrote Judge Harvie Wilkinson. “Consistent with this principle, there is a time honored tradition of legislative prayer that reflects the respect of each faith for other faiths and the aspiration, common to so many creeds, of finding higher meaning and deeper purpose in these fleeting moments each of us spends upon this earth.”

“Instead of drawing on this tradition, Rowan County elevated one religion above all others and aligned itself with that faith. It need not be so,” he continued. “As the history of legislative invocations demonstrates, the desire of this good county for prayer at the opening of its public sessions can be realized in many ways that further both religious exercise and religious tolerance.”

However, ADF and the Rowan County Board believe that the ruling is flawed and is inconsistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Greece ruling.

“In Town of Greece, the legislative prayer practice involved a rotating group of volunteer clergy from the surrounding community—and this court emphasized that while ‘nearly all of the congregations in town turned out to be Christian,’ that did ‘not reflect an aversion or bias on the part of town leaders against minority faiths,'” the board’s appeal, filed on Thursday, reads.

“Rather, ‘[s]o long as the town maintains a policy of nondiscrimination, the Constitution does not require it to search beyond its borders for non-Christian prayer givers in an effort to achieve religious balancing,'” ADF wrote, quoting from the high court.

As previously reported, contrary to the Fourth Circuit ruling, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld last month the predominantly Christian prayers of the Jackson County Board of Commissioners, finding that they do not violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

It noted that “[s]ince the founding of our Republic, Congress, state legislatures, and many municipal bodies have commenced legislative sessions with a prayer,” and likewise pointed to the Greece ruling for support.

“At bottom, [the Plaintiff] has shown he was offended by the Christian nature of the board’s prayers. But ‘[o]ffense … does not equate to coercion,’” the majority wrote. “Jackson County therefore did not ‘engage in impermissible coercion merely by exposing [Plaintiff] to prayer [he] would rather not hear and in which [he] need not participate.’”

“As one of Jackson County’s commissioners stated, ‘Commissioners, as individuals, have a right to pray as we believe.’ Preventing Jackson County’s commissioners from giving prayers of their own choosing detracts from their ability to take ‘a moment of prayer or quiet reflection [to] set their mind to a higher purpose and thereby ease the task of governing,’” it declared.


A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Judy Zwyghuizen

    It’s been working great all these Year’s why change anything for anyone opposing it for many Year’s Let’s not change any of our Constitution , we are a Christian Based America I don’t care if a few don’t like it our Believe in our way’s but DO NOT ALLOW them to change our way’s their over here in our Country and we are christian Based Culture !

    • meamsane

      Apparently, the SCOTUS never got the memo that the Constitutional Convention of the late 1780’s has ended and that we indeed did Ratify our current US Constitution from it. It would be to everyone’s benefit if they were informed of these developments!!

    • TheKingOfRhye

      “They’re over here in our country”

      Excuse me, but who are “they”? People who are not Christians? Last time I checked, there are no religious requirements for US citizenship. This is just as much MY country (as an atheist) as it is yours.

      And what are you talking about, “changing the Constitution”? Who even said anything about changing the Constitution in relation to this story?

      • MCrow

        You know, ‘them.’ The enigmatic, mysterious, ever present but never defined, *wink wink nudge nudge* them.

        And as for it being as much our country as atheists, I’ll believe that when we have an openly atheist senator…

        • TheKingOfRhye

          Yeah, you may have a point there. I don’t know though, I could see that happening eventually. I almost mentioned this earlier: If you lumped all the “non-religious” in the US together, and counted it as an “affiliation”, it’d be the 2nd largest (behind Christianity of course).

    • chronicintel

      Our culture may be predominantly Christian, but our country isn’t a Christian nation.

      Nowhere in our Constitution is God invoked even once.

      • Guest✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        You mean like in the ratification clause?

  • james blue

    The greatest threat to religious freedom this nation faces is people who want their faith to be the only one allowed. Do not try to tell me you’d be okay if Christian prayer was excluded because entire board identifies as non Christian.

    • Guest✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

      Blah blah blah.

      • james blue

        Oh look, the Canadian troll has returned. Where’ve you been?

    • meamsane

      Why would an entire board who is non-Christian want to, or even think of reciting a Christian Prayer or any prayer at all?

      • james blue

        Although it would include non believers, non-Christian doesn’t mean not religious.

        What about the public attendees?

        • meamsane

          What about public attendees?

          You specifically referenced “Christian Prayer” as opposed to non-Christian. You said nothing about other than non-Christian religions.

          • james blue

            What?

            Did you read the article?

          • meamsane

            Uh….yes!

          • james blue

            Okay, try to see if you can figure out what you missed.

  • Charlene

    Judge Beaty has a bad case of hubris. No surprising that Clinton appointed someone with an obvious bias against Christians.

  • Herb Planter

    rebuke these fools. they dont like it they can gtfo

  • NCOriolesFan

    Nan Lund does NOT rule the entire city of Salisbury, NC. The dislike of the name of Jesus is a PERSONAL problem that can only be PERSONALLY resolved, not by the courts. We the People do not elect our representatives to leave their religious freedom outside their office door.