Kansas Republican Party Votes to ‘Affirm God’s Design for Gender’

TOPEKA, Kan. — The Kansas Republican Party voted over the weekend to approve a resolution on human sexuality that affirms “God’s design for gender.”

The proposal had been submitted by Eric Teetsel, who serves as president of the Family Policy Alliance of Kansas and is also a Republican Party State Committee member. Teetsel is the son-in-law of former Gov. Sam Brownback.

“[A]ll persons are created in God’s image and, therefore, have inherent dignity and inalienable rights,” the resolution, approved on Saturday by a voice vote, reads. “God’s design was the creation of two distinct complementary sexes, male and female.”

It laments, therefore, that society has sought to make that which is a distortion of God’s creation acceptable and normal.

“[M]any have sought to normalize transgenderism and define gender according to one’s self-perception apart from biological anatomy,” the resolution states. “[S]ome Kansas schools are encouraging parents and teachers to affirm the feelings of children experiencing gender dysphoria.”

It says that some states are even taking steps to stop counselors from helping children who have gender dysphoria to accept themselves the way were created.

“[T]hese cultural currents run counter to God’s created order and violate the dignity and every human being,” the resolution notes. “Therefore, be it resolved that the Kansas Republican Party recognizes the dignity of every human being, including those who identify as LGBT; that we affirm God’s design for gender as determined by biological sex and not by self-perception; that we oppose efforts to surgically or hormonally alter one’s bodily identity to conform with one’s perceived gender identity; that we oppose all efforts to validate transgender identity…”

  • Connect with Christian News

It also states that parents should have the right to control their parent’s education, and that schools should not undermine parents who don’t agree with transgenderism.

Read the resolution in full here.

The group Equality Kansas has expressed opposition to the resolution, claiming that it is hateful and “attacks schoolchildren in the name of religion.”

“Yesterday afternoon, the Kansas Republican Party adopted a hateful anti-science, anti-trans policy that demeans and dehumanizes transgender Kansans, particularly transgender children,” it wrote in a social media post. “The author of the resolution, Sam Brownback’s son-in-law, Eric Teetsel, claimed it was a matter of ‘dignity.'”

“No. Denying science and attacking schoolchildren in the name of religion is not a recognition of ‘dignity,'” the group remarked. “This is a cheap election year attack by Sam Brownback’s son-in-law, and yet another attempt to dehumanize those who do not fit inside the narrow world view of Brownback, his family, and his wing of the Republican party.”

However, Teetsel said that the burgeoning concept of conforming oneself to one’s feelings is actually harmful, and therefore, the loving thing to do is to speak truth out of care for the well-being of those with the diagnosis.

“[A]n ideology that says you can determine your own gender identity is broken and it’s going to lead to a lot of pain,” Teetsel told the Wichita Eagle, “and that’s why it’s important to bring us back to what we know to be true and good.”

“Ultimately, we are motivated by love. It is concern for the well-being of others that drives us to seek out what is true and not just for society, but for them personally,” he stated.

As previously reported, Scripture states that those who turn God’s creation “upside down” are like the clay telling the potter that he doesn’t know what he’s doing.

Romans 9:20 says, “Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to Him that formed it, ‘Why hast thou made me thus?’”

Isaiah 29:16 also declares, “Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay, for shall the work say of Him that made it, ‘He made me not?’ Or shall the thing framed say of Him that framed it, ‘He had no understanding?’”


Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

Dear Reader, has ChristianNews.net been of benefit and a blessing to you? For many years now, the Lord has seen fit to use this small news outlet as a strong influential resource in keeping Christians informed on current events from a Biblical worldview. Despite Facebook's recent algorithm changes, which has limited our readership, and, as a result, has affected operational revenue, we continue to strive to bring you the news without compromise and to keep Christ in focus. If you have benefited from our news coverage, would you please prayerfully consider becoming a Christian News supporter by clicking here to make a one-time or monthly donation to help keep the truth widely and freely published and distributed? May Christ continue to be exalted through this work!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Amos Moses – He>i

    it appears some people in Kansas have masculine appendages and are not confused or “dysphoric” by it ………….

    • Judy Zwyghuizen

      Amen!
      Brother!

      • Amos Moses – He>i

        Thnx ….. just one Christian to another ….. i know some of the opinions here are abhorrent …. but watch the expletives …… i know it is difficult sometimes ….. especially for me …..

  • aedgeworth

    If homosexuals have evolved, they would have to be considered non-beneficial mutations, because they cannot reproduce. Therefore to allow them to marry or adopt children would be going against science and the survival of the fittest. Special rights and privileges for them would have to be considered unscientific and not for the good of the species.

    • Amos Moses – He>i

      ASTUTE observation ……….

    • ZappaSaid88

      Same sex interaction occurs throughout nature so you’re wrong. And LGBTQ folks are asking for equal rights not special rights.

      • Judy Zwyghuizen

        Bullshit equal right’s is not lawsuit’s to cover some Mental Issue! get help if you cannot except what the good Lord made you! it’s not a Choice!

        • Amos Moses – He>i

          language ………..

          • Michael C

            and syntax ………..

      • ppp777

        They are asking [ forcing ] their perversion down societies throats .

        • LynnRH

          Exactly right!.

    • SFBruce

      By your logic heterosexual couples who are unable to conceive shouldn’t be able to marry or adopt children. By your logic, serious diseases like breast cancer which are in part genetic, shouldn’t be treated, nor should such women be allowed to have children. And LGBT people don’t want “special rights;” we want the same rights everyone else has.

      • Amos Moses – He>i

        just more confusion, illusion and delusion ………..

        • SFBruce

          Inflammatory language about same sex relationships doesn’t answer the central question I raised: If gay couples can’t marry or adopt children because we can’t procreate on our own, why, then, should heterosexual couples who can’t conceive be permitted to marry and adopt?

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            i have met many people who have been told they cannot procreate …. and then did …… BIOLOGY 101 …… two of the same sex CANNOT EVER PROCREATE …… basic science ….. and most 5-6 year olds KNOW IT …… the rest of your inquiry is just “well if they can then why cant I” garbage ….. here is the issue ….. 1.) you CAN marry just as everyone else does ….. find a member of the opposite sex AND DO IT …… NOTHING ever stopped any homosexual from getting married EVER …… but they DO NOT WANT a marriage ….. they want the DEPRAVITY …… and they want the rest of a society to ACCEPT their depravity …. 2.) being homosexual fulfills not even ONE of the needs to CREATE a society and in fact leads to the DESTRUCTION of PRODUCTIVE society …… WHY …. on WHAT BASIS ….. should that relationship be recognized when all it does is DESTROY the society that they DEMAND recognize them and their depravity ………… they are the barbarians at the gate saying “please let us come in and kill what you have created” ….. but i will give them credit ….. they have LIED very cleverly to FOOL a great many into believing their lie …..

          • SFBruce

            “…… the rest of your inquiry is just ‘well if they can then why cant I’ garbage …..”

            You’re trivializing the concept of equal protection under the law. If you want our laws to reflect your unsupported claim that acceptance of LGBT people will lead to the destruction of society, you’re going to have to come up with actual reasons for why that’s the case. Rants in all caps and personal attacks won’t do it.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            Nope …. you have no “equal protect” to DESTROY what has been built ….. “will lead to the destruction of society, you’re going to have to come up with actual reasons for why that’s the case” … mostly because THERE IS NOT one DOCUMENTED case of ANY civilization that accepted it and survived it ………… HISTORY is against you ……

            “Sumerian, Greek, Roman, Babylonian, Moorish, Anglo-Saxon, and many other societies, all fell shortly after they abandoned sexual chastity. Sexual permissiveness would cause societies to decline unless their sexual mores became more rigid.”

            “These societies lived in different geographical environments; they belonged to different racial stocks; but the history of their marriage customs is the same. In the beginning, each society had the same ideas in regard to sexual regulations. Then the same struggles took place; the same sentiments were expressed; the same changes were made; the same results ensued. Each society reduced its sexual opportunity to a minimum and displaying great social energy, flourished greatly. Then it extended its sexual opportunity; its energy decreased, and faded away. The one outstanding feature of the whole story is its unrelieved monotony.”

            “Unwin’s conclusions, which are based upon an enormous wealth of carefully sifted evidence, may be summed up as follows. All human societies are in one or another of six cultural conditions: zoistic, manistic, deistic, rationalistic, expansive, productive. Of these societies the zoistic displays the least amount of mental and social energy, the productive the most. Investigation shows that the societies exhibiting the least amount of energy are those where pre-nuptial continence is not imposed and where the opportunities for sexual indulgence after marriage are greatest. The cultural condition of a society rises in exact proportion as it imposes pre-nuptial and post-nuptial restraints upon sexual opportunity.”

            “In human records there is no instance of a society retaining its energy after a complete new generation has inherited a tradition which does not insist on pre-nuptial and post-nuptial continence.” For Roman, Greek, Sumerian, Moorish, Babylonian, and Anglo-Saxon civilizations, Unwin had several hundred years of history to draw on. He found with no exceptions that these societies flourished during eras that valued sexual fidelity. Inevitably, sexual mores would loosen and the societies would subsequently decline, only to rise again when they returned to more rigid sexual standards.”

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            Here’s Orwell’s nightmare scenario in 1984

            destruction of the family unit
            Thought police (offensive thoughts / language is dangerous)
            No privacy
            No guns or any other means of defending yourself against the state
            Powerful central government in which citizens are completely dependent upon
            Dishonest Media / Propaganda
            Anti – Tradition
            Erasing Past History
            Morph language to be as generic and inoffensive as possible
            Equal outcome (socialism)

            AND YOU are involved in ALL of that ….. DESTRUCTION of society …………..

          • ppp777

            Pretty much bang on , ” nothing new under the sun ” , history always repeats itself .

          • ppp777

            God ends up doing that .

      • Regeanvoter

        Please specify those rights as it appears you should already have them. However, there is no right to force one who disagrees with your stand to support it, and they also do not have the right to force you to agree with theirs. That is called equality and freedom of opinion.

    • Michael C

      How does “science” dictate who should be permitted to marry or raise their children?

      How does “science” dictate whether or not lgbt people should be protected from discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations?

      Do you think that “science” demands that we should only allow the fittest to live? Is this really your understanding of how science works? Do you have a library nearby?

    • Judy Zwyghuizen

      And not good for any child to be raised under !

    • james blue

      If gays can marry what “special right” or “privilege” will they have that heterosexuals do not?

    • Samwise

      It appears you really do not understand evolution.

      • TheKingOfRhye

        He’s far from the only one around here….

      • ppp777

        Do you , or are you just repeating yourself .

        • Samwise

          I have taken the time to learn about evolution. When I was in my 40s, I realized I really had learned nothing about evolution in school and I no idea what it actually said.

          So I decided to take the time to learn about it and the claimed controversy. The Theory of Evolution is amazing. And the controversy is entirely social.

          There is no scientific doubt that the earth is a planetary body that orbits the sun, regardless of the claims or sincerity of the flat earth society. Likewise, there is no scientific doubt that life on earth evolves and natural selection is the primary driver, regardless of the claims or sincerity of a subset of christians.

          • ppp777

            I’m afraid you have been conned big time , if you think evolution is true you are either deluded or wilfully ignorant , evolution is no more true than a flat earth , your age doesn’t make things better either it makes it worse , shame on you .

          • Sally Edwards

            So are you going to tell the entire population of evolutionary biologists that their profession is a lie, too?

    • ppp777

      Evolutionists will always have an answer by changing the goal posts , remember part of their mind set is to cut down on human populations [ abortions e t c ] so the will tell you that the ” evolution of homosexuals ” is natures way of population control .

      • LynnRH

        “natures way of population control” Bwahahaha! That’s funny! But seriously……evolutionists will always have an answer UNTIL they face God Almighty that is. And then they won’t be able to utter a word.

  • SFBruce

    Our government is a secular one which guarantees religious freedom for everyone, including those individuals who find their own sense of their gender is out of sync with their physical body. The very last thing the state should be involved with is “God’s design” for anything; the only thing this will accomplish is to further marginalize the trans community in Kansas.

    • Amos Moses – He>i

      “Our government is a secular one”

      Nope …. it is not …..

      “which guarantees religious freedom for everyone, including those individuals who find their own sense of their gender is out of sync with their physical body”

      that is not a religion ……… FAIL …. try again ………..

      • SFBruce

        Explain to me how a government can guarantee freedom of conscience, and at the same time indicate which beliefs are right and which ones are wrong?

        • Amos Moses – He>i

          because they go hand in hand …… you CANNOT have ANY true freedom WITHOUT defining right and wrong … and then demand that if you want to be part of that freedom you accept the definition that defines that freedom …………… that BUILT that freedom ….. and all the homosexual is doing is DESTROYING what they CLAIM they want to be a part of and yet REJECT what built it in the first place ……….. your mommy and daddy PROCREATED …. they BUILT this society and this freedom by CREATING life ……….. and you REJECT the work that went into building it …….. WHY should you be entitled to DESTROY what was built ……..

          • SFBruce

            It’s simply not possible to have freedom of religion, if the government tells us what religions are acceptable. If you don’t accept that, you simply don’t understand the concept of freedom.

          • MCrow

            In past discussion, his definition of freedom are labyrinthian…get ready for a wild ride

          • ppp777

            Evolutionary thinking have turned peoples thinking into not believing in objective morality , you are dealing with reprobates .

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            sure … and God can work in their lives to bring them to repentance …. it is up to us to preach and speak the word of His truth whenever and to whomever we can …..

      • TheKingOfRhye

        He’s not saying being transgender is a religion; he’s saying transgender people have freedom of religion. (like everybody else)

        • Amos Moses – He>i

          Here’s Orwell’s nightmare scenario in 1984

          destruction of the family unit
          Thought police (offensive thoughts / language is dangerous)
          No privacy
          No guns or any other means of defending yourself against the state
          Powerful central government in which citizens are completely dependent upon
          Dishonest Media / Propaganda
          Anti – Tradition
          Erasing Past History
          Morph language to be as generic and inoffensive as possible
          Equal outcome (socialism)

          • TheKingOfRhye

            None of which has a damn thing to do with anything I said.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            it pretty much is what you do ….. it is an indictment of all your positions ……

          • TheKingOfRhye

            What is “what I do”? You’re not making any sense.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            you come here and spout opinions that are right in line with what i posted ….. you know what you do ………..

          • TheKingOfRhye

            No, I don’t “spout opinions” like that. For one thing, if you think I’m a socialist, you either don’t know me, or you don’t know what socialism is. Or maybe both.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            whether you actually support “socialism” ….. is debatable ……. but the rest of your positions ARE inline with socialist thinking ……… it is pretty much your default setting …..

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Hey, you’re the one whose idea of “religious freedom” seems to be the “freedom” to only choose the “right” religion. That would fit right in with all those communist and/or socialist countries that have called themselves the “People’s democratic republic” or some such thing, when they’re really just about as un-democratic as it gets.

            Oh, and I noticed one of those things you listed was “no guns”….OK, go ahead and tell me when I’ve ever said anything here about taking guns away, or really anything about guns of any sort, here. If you really want to know, though, I do believe any law-abiding US citizen should (as they do) have the right to own a gun. But, I’m okay with tightening restrictions, and having background checks and such. Honestly, it’s not as big of an issue with me as other things, the things I usually comment about. Maybe just because I’ve never had a gun myself, or any desire or felt like I had a need to have one.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            nope …… this country was not founded to give “any religion” a refuge ………. you are describing some post-modern garbage about what YOU want it to be and not what it is …… so AGAIN …… socialistic garbage ….. post-modern claptrap …… and the DESTRUCTION of this country is what you are about ……….

          • TheKingOfRhye

            the DESTRUCTION of this country is what you are about

            You know, I am absolutely sick of this kind of thing, and I even see it from people on “my side” of things, so to speak. (but more from yours, I think) Why would I, or anyone else, want to DESTROY the country I live in, have lived in all my life? Is it so unreasonable to think that we BOTH want what is good for the country (which is, after all, ultimately what is good for ourselves) even though we might at times have very different ideas of just what that means? Or maybe it’s just easier to try to make whoever disagrees with you look like some sort of comic-book villain, I guess.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            “Why would I, or anyone else, want to DESTROY the country I live in, have lived in all my life?”

            the fact that your choices do not reflect the desire you have to not do it …… does not alter the truth that the choices you want to make DO IN FACT AND WILL cause it ….. you deny an OBJECTIVE MORALITY ….. it clouds your judgement and you cannot see clearly the outcome of the choices you want, desire, and think are right …… it is like an inexperienced driver going down a dirt road at 40 MPH and not realizing the loose gravel is dangerous ….. you have some false sense that what you are doing is right ……. and you cannot see the danger that is overtaking you and the rest of the country ………..

          • TheKingOfRhye

            Now you’re contradicting yourself. First it’s “you’re ABOUT the destruction of the country”, now you’re clearly saying it’s not what I want, but what I DO want will lead to it. Make up your mind.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            “about” has more than one meaning and it depends on CONTEXT ……. the word “about” is an adjective, and an adverb and a preposition ….. and your positions that you declare here and other places ….. bring ABOUT consequences …. and your actions bring ABOUT consequences ……… and so YES ….. it is what you are ABOUT …… as an ADVERB …. and whether you are conscience of it or not ………. it is what you are about ….

            adverb
            11.
            near in time, number, degree, etc.; approximately:

          • TheKingOfRhye

            So you’re saying I am “approximately the destruction of the country”?

            Seriously, you need to start making yourself clearer. It’s a battle to understand what your point is at times, and the constant ellipses don’t help anything either.

          • Amos Moses – He>i

            i am saying your positions and opinions bring you in the realm of being ABOUT it …… near it …. in PROXIMITY of it ….. and you are traveling down a loose gravel road and do not realize the danger you are bringing ABOUT …………

  • Judy Zwyghuizen

    Wonderful new’s then we here in Arkansas don’t have to be bothered by all these lawsuit’s these Homo’s have been trying to get It is exactly what god created you and they need to learn they cannot choose which sex they want to be , this is called mental help ! AMEN Jesus rules!

    • Michael C

      You are correct. It is 100% legal for Arkansas businesses to fire people from their jobs just because they’re gay or transgender, deny them a place to live just because they’re gay or transgender, and refuse them service at stores and restaurants just because they’re gay or transgender.

      That’s an odd thing to be praising.

      • Samwise

        Yes, and after they deny employment and housing to people who are gay or trans, they will wonder at the high rates of unemployment and homelessness among LGBT people.

  • Reason2012

    Adults continue to permanently turn away from homosexuality and transgenderism, even after decades of believing the lie they were “born that way”, proving it’s not genetic, but the product of indoctrination, confusion, mental instability and/or abuse.

    Homosexual behavior is most literally pointed out as a sin, and God has not changed on that regard. But if a person has those inclinations but does not act upon them, does not dwell in lust upon others, but is instead struggling against them to avoid them, then it’s not a sin. It’s just like sinful inclinations of any kind: it’s acting upon it when it becomes a sin.

    And this is what God says about sin and specifically the behavior of homosexuality:

    Romans 1:26-27 ”For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: (27) And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their_lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.”

    1 Corinthians 6:9-10 ”Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate [men who willingly take on the part of a “woman” with another man], nor abusers of themselves with mankind [s odomites], (10) Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.”

    1 Timothy 1:9-10 ”Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, (10) For_whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind [s odomites], for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;”

    Jude 1:7 ”Even as_Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”

    Luke 17:29 ”[Jesus said] But the same day that Lot went out of_Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.”

    Matthew 19:4-6 ”And he [Jesus] answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, (5) And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? (6) Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”

    Jesus made it quite clear God made us male and female so that a man will leave his father and mother (not two fathers, not three mothers and so on) and cleave onto his wife (not his husband and so on).

    The Word of God rebukes us all – even if we all try to say we don’t believe the Bible, the very Word of God will be our judge when we face Him. And God is a righteous judge and will judge us all – not turn a blind eye to our sin. Do not be deceived by the world: it’s God we will have to convince that His word was a lie, not men. What happened in Noah’s day when the entire world rejected God? Did God spare them because there were so many? No – they all perished except for Noah and his family!

    Proverbs 9:10 ”The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.”

    God spared not His chosen people – we are kidding ourselves if we think He will spare the United States of America if we choose to blatantly turn away from Him.

    Jeremiah 12:17 ”But if they will not obey, I will utterly pluck up and destroy that nation, saith the LORD.”

    Luke 17:28-30 “So also as it was in the days of Lot: they ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built; (29) but the day Lot went out of Sodom, it rained fire and brimstone from the heaven and destroyed them all. (30) Even so it shall be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed.”

    Romans 1:18-32 “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold [suppress] the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

    For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

    Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

    For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, m urder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.”

    The entire Bible points out men having_sex with men is an abomination. Likewise woman having_sex with women. It’s not just Paul that pointed it out.

    Genesis 19:4-13 “But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of S odom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them [men wanting to have_sex with men].

    And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly. Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing [he offers his daughters to be_raped to keep them from having_sex with another man – shows_rape is not the issue but male on male_sex]; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.

    And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door. But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door. And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.

    And the men said unto Lot, Hast thou here any besides? son in law, and thy sons, and thy daughters, and whatsoever thou hast in the city, bring them out of this place: For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the LORD; and the LORD hath sent us to destroy it.”

    These two messengers were sent to destroy that place before the event where they tried to_rape these messengers.

    Leviticus 18:22 “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”

    Leviticus 20:13 “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination …”

    Even cross-dressing is an abomination:

    Deuteronomy 22:5 “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.”

    Deuteronomy 23:17 “There shall be no_whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a s odomite of the sons of Israel.”

    1 Kings 22:46 “And the remnant of the s odomites, which remained in the days of his father Asa, he took out of the land.”

    1 Kings 15:11-12 “And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David his father. And he took away the s odomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made.”

    2 Kings 23:7 “And he brake down the houses of the s odomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove.”

    Ezekiel 16:49-50 “Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister S odom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.”

    And the “pride” parades about homosexuality are more of the same.

    Even Jesus points out marriage is a man and a woman.

    Matthew 19:4-5 “And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?”

    Not father and father. Not mother and mother. Not his husband.

    And only two people of opposite gender can become “one flesh”.

    Live forever, people – not temporarily only to be cast out for living for the things of this world.

    May God/Jesus Christ be glorified!

    • Tim Kennedy

      The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.”
      Does that mean we are going to be told what to wear also,Has any one ever heard of judge ye not lest ye be judged? Must just be in my bible LOL
      Government has no business in the bedroom in a democratic republic period.
      This is exactly what the gop does to take away rights under the constitution and bend them to get votes,all while attesting how much they love the constitution and GOD blah blah blah.

      • Reason2012

        Hello. If someone admits to running red lights, it’s not “judging” them to point out the consequences of the law in the hopes they stop doing so – that’s called actually caring for said person so they can avoid judgment.

        No one has a “right” to throw out biology and pretend that feelings override biological facts and then furthermore indoctrinating everyone else’s kids and grandkids filling their minds with images and ideas of such things. This is a law attempting to rebuke the perversion activism of “beliefs override biological fact”.

    • ppp777

      ” Abusers with themselves with mankind ” , explain why you think that is referring to sodomites ? , ” And God gave them over to a reprobate mind ” .

  • Amos Moses – He>i

    Who Are the Rich, White Men Institutionalizing Transgender Ideology?
    Exceedingly rich, white men (and women) who invest in biomedical companies are funding myriad transgender organizations whose agenda will make them gobs of money.
    Jennifer Bilek By Jennifer Bilek
    FEBRUARY 20, 2018
    As an environmental activist who was deplatformed from a speaking venue by transactivists, in 2013 I developed curiosity about the power of this group to force this development. A year later, when Time magazine announced a transgender tipping point on its cover, I had already begun to examine the money behind the transgender project.

    I have watched as all-women’s safe spaces, universities, and sports opened their doors to any man who chose to identify as a woman. Whereas men who identify as transwomen are at the forefront of this project, women who identify as transmen seem silent and invisible. I was astonished that such a huge cultural change as the opening of sex-protected spaces was happening at such a meteoric pace and without consideration for women and girls’ safety, deliberation, or public debate.

    Concurrent with these rapid changes, I witnessed an overhaul in the English language with new pronouns and a near-tyrannical assault on those who did not use them. Laws mandating new speech were passed. Laws overriding biological sex with the amorphous concept of gender identity are being instituted now. People who speak openly about these changes can find themselves, their families, and their livelihoods threatened.

    These elements, along with media saturation of the issue, had me wondering: Is this really a civil rights issue for a tiny part of the population with body dysphoria, or is there a bigger agenda with moneyed interests that we are not seeing? This article can only begin to graze the surface of this question, but considering transgenderism has basically exploded in the middle of capitalism, which is notorious for subsuming social justice movements, there is value in beginning this examination.

    Who Is Funding the Transgender Movement?
    I found exceedingly rich, white men with enormous cultural influence are funding the transgender lobby and various transgender organizations. These include but are not limited to Jennifer Pritzker (a male who identifies as transgender); George Soros; Martine Rothblatt (a male who identifies as transgender and transhumanist); Tim Gill (a gay man); Drummond Pike; Warren and Peter Buffett; Jon Stryker (a gay man); Mark Bonham (a gay man); and Ric Weiland (a deceased gay man whose philanthropy is still LGBT-oriented). Most of these billionaires fund the transgender lobby and organizations through their own organizations, including corporations.

    ~ The Federalist

    • ppp777

      The love of money again .

  • Nidalap

    Holy common sense, Batman! 🙂

  • Regeanvoter

    What I find intriguing is those who reject the idea of two separate sexes being necessary to bring forth new life as being “anti science”. I would suggest they prove their claim then by making a baby using their preferred couples. We’ll wait.

    • Michael C

      What I find intriguing is those who reject the idea of two separate sexes being necessary to bring forth new life as being “anti science”.

      I don’t quite understand this sentence. Perhaps there are some words missing? Are you claiming that there are people out there who not only don’t believe that the opposite sexes are required to create human babies but they also claim that this basic biological fact is “anti-science?”

      I would suggest they prove their claim then by making a baby using their preferred couples.

      Who are these people? Where are they? What are their names? I’ve never heard anyone say anything that even closely resembles what you’re claiming.

      Can you please tell me who said these things?

      We’ll wait.

      Yes. I’ll wait for you to tell me who made these claims.

  • There are no she-he’s or he-she’s. There is only male and female and if you look between your legs you will no longer be confused by which one you are unless you are mentally ill.