Anchorage Voters Narrowly Reject Proposal That Would Have Mandated Restroom Use to Correspond With Birth Sex

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Voters in Anchorage, Alaska have narrowly rejected a proposal that would have mandated restroom use in buildings that are owned by the city to correspond with one’s birth gender.

Proposition 1 would have required “all multiple occupancy changing facilities and restrooms that are owned or operated by the municipality to be designated for, and used only by, persons of the same sex,” voiding language in the city’s current nondiscrimination ordinance.

It also would have allowed places of public accommodation, such as faith-based shelters, to establish policies surrounding the use of locker rooms, changing rooms, restrooms, showers and any other intimate facilities.

Read the proposal in full here.

The measure was especially backed by the group Alaska Family Action (AFA), which believes that “in private, intimate spaces such as locker rooms and showers, women and girls should not have to be exposed to men, and vice versa” and that “the duty of government is to protect Alaskans’ privacy, safety, and dignity in intimate places—not threaten it.”

AFA released two television advertisements, with one featuring a woman named Kate who told her story of personally witnessing a man who identifies as a woman watching the ladies showering in the locker room.

“I was in the locker room and there was this man watching the women shower. The staff said, ‘This person identifies as a female. You’re the one with the problem,'” she recalled. “Predatory men are using these laws to violate women. … Violating the privacy of women is discrimination.”

  • Connect with Christian News

View the video here.

The coalition called Fair Anchorage emerged as the proposal’s main opponent, as it organized a group of volunteers to make calls and knock on doors to urge residents to vote no. Alaska Public Media also reports that Fair Anchorage raised $824K for their efforts as compared to the $128K raised by Proposition 1 supporters.

“Many of the donations are non-monetary contributions from outside national groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, Freedom for All Americans and Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and Hawaii, most of which were for compensation for staff time, services and consultations,” the outlet notes, however.

While many residents supported the proposal, it did not generate enough votes for a passage. Out of the 76,950 votes that were cast, 36,415 voted yes, and 40,535 voted no—47 percent to 52 percent.

Opponents of Proposition 1 called it a victory against “hate” and “bigotry.”

“Anchorage voters refused to succumb to hate and bigotry by rejecting this discriminatory, anti-transgender ballot measure. Community leaders, businesses, faith leaders, and public officials all spoke out in support of equality,” Chad Griffin, the president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement.

However, those who backed the measure said that it is not about hatred, but a desire not to support sin and for those with gender dysphoria to obtain help.

“We pray for our mentally ill. They are people, too, in need of divine intervention! Praise God for man is man & woman is woman,” one commenter wrote.

“Transgenderism is a sin. It is when a person rejects how God made them. This is a great rebellion against God. They need to know that God never makes mistakes nor can He. He loves them, but He desires better things for them than they could ever imagine,” another stated.

As previously reported, Christians believe that all men are born with the Adamic sin nature, and have inherent inclinations that are contrary to the law of God, being utterly incapable of helping themselves. It is why Jesus outlined in John 3:5-7 that men must be regenerated by the second birth.

“Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God,” he declared. “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.”

2 Corinthians 5:15-17 also teaches, “He died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him which died for them, and rose again. … Therefore, if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.”

Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

Dear Reader, has been of benefit and a blessing to you? For many years now, the Lord has seen fit to use this small news outlet as a strong influential resource in keeping Christians informed on current events from a Biblical worldview. Despite Facebook's recent algorithm changes, which has limited our readership, and, as a result, has affected operational revenue, we continue to strive to bring you the news without compromise and to keep Christ in focus. If you have benefited from our news coverage, would you please prayerfully consider becoming a Christian News supporter by clicking here to make a one-time or monthly donation to help keep the truth widely and freely published and distributed? May Christ continue to be exalted through this work!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Brian Curtis

    How sad that Anchorage voters wouldn’t stand up for discrimination. I guess they just weren’t Christian enough.

  • Rock it!

    How the heck did they mess this one up. It’s a no-brainer.

    Well, a lady who’d been to Alaska noted that there was like a 9 to 1 ratio of Men to Women.

    She said, the Odds are good, but the Goods are odd.

  • Tim Matter

    Think about these laws before you pass them. This would force women who have transitioned to appear to be fully male, to use the women’s bathroom with your wives and little girls, and there is not a legal thing you could do about it. You made it illegal for them to use the men’s room.

    • That is convoluted bullhockey

      • Tim Matter

        Doug Bristow- Sure is. Some of them had surgery and took hormones, and have the appearance, beards, muscles and genitals like a man, and this law would require them to use the ladies room or face arrest. That’s messes up.

        • Tristan Fry

          Such a good point and hardly anyone ever makes it. Thanks.

  • TheKingOfRhye

    Someone just tell me how these kinds of “bathroom bills” are supposed to be enforced. Should everyone carry their birth certificate around if they want to use the bathroom in an Anchorage city building?

    • Tangent002 ✓

      And who’s going to check to make sure the goods match the description?

      • TheKingOfRhye

        Maybe that’s what we should ask people who are in favor of these kinds of things: Do you want to be the one to check people?

        • Dianne S

          Search YouTube for Funny or Die Bathroom Cop. 🙂

          • TheKingOfRhye

            “I have determined that you are indeed in possession of an illegal genital” LOL