Another UK Couple Fighting for Son’s Life After Judge Rules Life Support Should Be Removed

Photo Credit:

LIVERPOOL — Another couple in the UK is fighting for their son’s life after a judge ruled on Wednesday in favor of the hospital’s wishes to remove live support.

Tom Evans and Kate James took their then six-month-old son Alfie to Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in Liverpool in December 2016 due to a chest infection. The child, who had been born healthy by all indications, had been taken to the doctor by his parents prior to his admittance as he began exhibiting abnormal jerking movements. Evans and James state that they were told that the boy was simply a late bloomer.

While hospitalized, Alfie struggled to breathe due to a myoclonic jerking spasm, and was placed on life support. In January 2016, it was thought that Alfie would not make it, but he overcame the infection for a time and began to improve. However, the infant had to be intubated again after contracting another infection, and is now stated to be in a semi-vegetative state.

Evans and James state that they still do not know specifically what is wrong with their son other than that he has a degenerative neurological condition, and disagree with the hospital that Alfie is unaware of his surroundings.

“Time and time again, despite not being diagnosed or treated for any suspected underlying disease, his seizures being somewhat controlled by a heavy cocktail of sedating drugs, Alfie has come back over and over from every infection and challenge,” a petition on reads.

The petition has over 229,000 signatures as of press time.

“The hospital claims that Alfie is ‘insensate’ and unaware of any stimulus or irritation, which is proven wrong in hundreds of videos, against the odds of a heavy cocktail of anti-seizure drugs with sedative effect. Daily, Alfie moves, stretches, yawns, responding to tickling and noise and cuddling,” it states.

  • Connect with Christian News

Alfie’s parents want their son transferred to another hospital where he can be weaned off sedation, undergo a tracheotomy and PEG tube placement, and obtain a definitive diagnosis for his disease—or at least a second opinion. They would like to send Alfie either to Italy or Germany to obtain help.

However, in court proceedings, hospital officials testified that they believe that Alfie’s brain is “entirely beyond recovery” and 70 percent damaged. They argued that it is in the child’s “best interests” to be withdrawn from life support.

According to the BBC, Justice Anthony Hayden ruled in February that Alfie’s plight was “profoundly unfair,” but agreed with Alder Hey that treatment measures would be futile, and that the nearly two-year-old boy rather needs “good quality palliative care.” A court of appeals upheld the ruling last month.

On Wednesday, Hayden ordered the end-of-life plan to proceed, stating that while he understands the frustration of Alfie’s parents, he sees no chance of recovery and believes Evans is hoping for an “entirely unrealistic solution.”

“On February 20, I gave a conclusion after six days of evidence after which Mr. Evans cross examined doctors with conspicuous skill and manifest sincerity,” he said. “But I came to the conclusion at the end of that hearing that Alfie’s brain had been so corrupted by mitochondrial disease that his life was futile.”

“By the time I came to conclude the case the terrible reality is that almost the entirety of Alfie’s brain had been eroded, leaving only water and spinal fluid,” Hayden stated. “Even at the end of February, the connective pathways within the brain had been obliterated. They were no longer even identifiable.”

“This afternoon, I have endorsed the care plan constructed by the Trust setting out the provisions for the end of Alfie’s life. That plan has the endorsement of Alfie’s guardian, who emphasizes in effect it is long overdue,” he wrote.

Evans and James have filed one more emergency appeal with the help of the Christian Legal Centre, which expressed disappointment in Hayden’s conclusion. They believe that their parental rights are wrongly being usurped.

“We are obviously disappointed with today’s outcome,” attorney Paul Diamond told the BBC. “While hope looks dim, we nonetheless celebrate Alfie’s life. The impact his short life has made ultimately shows the world the precariousness of human life.”

“My thoughts and prayers are with Kate and Tom this evening,” he said.

Evans told reporters following the ruling that since there are hospitals that are willing to take his son, he should be given that chance. He also believes that video footage (below) of Alfie stretching, yawning and opening his eyes, shows that doctors shouldn’t give up on him yet.

“He’s got life in him and he’s got the potential to live, and he’s got hospitals that want to take him,” he said. “Then the doctors come in and tell you that there’s been no change and he’s still the same when you’ve got the video to say, ‘What’s this? What’s that?'”

The Christian Legal Centre says that Hayden viewed the recordings, and while he remarked that he was “not medically capable of determining what he was actually seeing in the video,” he proceeded with the end-of-life ruling anyway in light of the grim testimony presented by hospital representatives.

Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

Dear Reader, has been of benefit and a blessing to you? For many years now, the Lord has seen fit to use this small news outlet as a strong influential resource in keeping Christians informed on current events from a Biblical worldview. With much compromise and many falsehoods in modern-day Christianity, we strive to bring you the news by keeping Christ and His word in focus. If you have benefited from our news coverage, please prayerfully consider becoming a Christian News supporter by clicking here to make a one-time or monthly donation to help keep the truth of God's word widely and freely published and distributed. May Christ continue to be exalted through this work!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email