Federal Court Rules Christian Ministries Can Hire or Fire According to Their Beliefs

Court-GavelGRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — A federal court has ruled that Christian ministries can hire or fire persons in accordance with their religious beliefs.

As previously reported, Alyce Conlon had filed suit against InterVarsity Christian Fellowship (IVF) after she was fired for failing to reconcile marital problems with her husband. She had worked as a spiritual director from 2004 to 2011, providing biblical guidance and leading employees in prayer.

Conlon was placed on paid leave to give her time to resolve the issues as she and her husband were considering separation or divorce. Officials with IVF also worked with the couple to reconcile. She was fired in Dec. 2011 after the organization stated that it had “not seen enough progress” between the two in healing their marriage. Her husband filed for divorce a month later.

“This belief is in line with … position descriptions which state that our employees are to be maturing disciples of Christ,” IVF outlined in a letter that was filed with the lawsuit. “When there are significant marital issues, we encourage employees to seek appropriate help to move towards reconciliation.”

The organization also stated that it is important “to consider the impact of any separation/divorce on colleagues, students, faculty, and donors.”

Conlon filed suit against IVF in 2o12 alleging discrimination, and the organization responded by pointing to the ministerial exception allowed by the courts under the First Amendment’s free exercise clause. The federal district court agreed and dismissed Conlon’s claims. She appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

On Thursday, the court upheld the ruling.

  • Connect with Christian News

“Because IVCF is a religious organization and Conlon was a ministerial employee, IVCF’s decision to terminate her employment cannot be challenged under federal or state employment discrimination laws,” the three-judge panel declared. “The Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses do not permit federal or state courts to adjudicate such matters when the defendant properly asserts the ministerial exception as an affirmative defense.”

It pointed to a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which declared, “The interest of society in the enforcement of employment discrimination statutes is undoubtedly important. But so too is the interest of religious groups in choosing who will preach their beliefs, teach their faith, and carry out their mission.” Although the high court ruling centered on churches, the appeals court judges ruled that it should also apply to religious groups.

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which had filed a friend of the court brief in the case, applauded the Sixth Circuit decision.

“As the Sixth Circuit affirmed, the ability of faith-based groups to make employment decisions consistent with the very faith they espouse is a ‘structural limitation imposed on the government by the Religion Clauses [of the First Amendment], a limitation that can never be waived,'” Senior Legal Counsel David Hacker said in a statement. “The court was right to recognize that this freedom extends to groups beyond just those that are directly run by churches and denominations.”

“No one should be coerced by the government to act contrary to their deepest, historically recognized faith convictions,” he added.

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • Fundisi

    ““The Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses do not permit federal or
    state courts to adjudicate such matters when the defendant properly
    asserts the ministerial exception as an affirmative defense.”

    This is a no-brainer – if a business is ministry oriented, whether they sell a product or service, they are allowed to discriminate under the 1st Amendment.

  • thoughtsfromflorida

    I concur with the court’s decision in this case.

  • Badkey

    Remember this case when Ken Ham loses his case. You can hire or fire… and get federal / state dollars or not. Your choice. Good ruling.

  • JKomar

    That should apply to Islam as well, then.

  • The Lone Ranger

    I hope they can fire the Devil

  • SFBruce

    Alyce Conlon’s claimed that the IVF treated men differnetly who were also undergoing divorces, and while that’s troubling,

  • TheBBP

    This bodes well for the Ark project who is under fire for only seeking to hire people of faith.

  • Grace Kim Kwon

    Thank God! Religious liberty’s small victory!

  • thoughtsfromflorida

    How is this ruling possible? I thought the courts will filled with anti-Christian liberals who ignore the constitution.

    Oh, wait, that’s only when they rule in a way some Christians don’t like. Never mind.