75 Technology Companies Join Open Letter to Congressional Leaders in Support of Planned Parenthood

WASHINGTON — 75 technology companies recently joined an open letter to the leaders of Congress in support of the abortion and contraception giant Planned Parenthood out of their concern that the organization could be defunded.

The correspondence, addressed to majority and minority leaders Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, asserts that Planned Parenthood is a vital health care provider for women.

“As business leaders committed to connecting people with the information and services they need to thrive, we urge Congress not to pursue any legislation that blocks women from accessing critical preventive care—including well-woman exams, birth control, and cancer screenings—at Planned Parenthood health centers,” it reads.

The letter also claims that the organization is responsible for the recent reported decline in teen pregnancy.

“We are committed to supporting their ability to build on this important work and, above all, we are connected to Planned Parenthood’s mission which so closely resembles what we stand for as leaders in technology: creating opportunity for everyone to chart their own path in life and pursue their own ingenuity—without barriers or fear,” it states.

The companies assert that without Planned Parenthood, women will be denied preventative health care and will have to “overcome political hurdles to take care of their health.”

Signees include David Karp of Tumblr, Dennis Crowley of Foursquare, Alexis Ohanian of Reddit, Rick Webb of Timehop, Scott Heiferman of Meetup, Julia Hartz of Eventbrite, Aaron Levie of Box, Georg Petschnigg of FiftyThree, John Borthwick of Betaworks and Karen Cahn of IFundWomen.

  • Connect with Christian News

The letter is stated to be an extension of a partnership between Tumblr and Planned Parenthood. According to USA Today, Tumblr employees donated $80,000 to the organization just last month, and Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg also donated $1 million.

As previously reported, according to the organization’s annual report, Planned Parenthood performed 323,999 abortions nationwide during the 2014-2015 fiscal year. The figure accounts for at least one-third of all abortions nationwide, when compared to statistics released in November by the Centers for Disease Control.

Planned Parenthood has not released its 2015-2016 report for unknown reasons, which has raised questions and red flags for some pro-life groups.

As it has been in previous years, Planned Parenthood’s largest focus in 2014-2015 was sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s), as it tested and/or treated over four million people for sexual ailments, with over 3.5 million tests and 32 thousand men and women being treated for ailments contracted through sexual activity.

Over 2.9 million people were provided with contraceptives or other forms of birth control in 2014—from temporary to permanent, including over 900 thousand emergency contraception kits. The figure is down from 3.5 million the year before, and 3.7 million in 2012.

Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms as it is not licensed to operate mammogram machines, and its annual report outlined that fewer than 700,000 women received services surrounding cancer screenings, equating to just seven percent of its services, while STD testing and contraceptives accounted for 76 percent of its services.

Nonetheless, Planned Parenthood received $553 million in taxpayer funding/grants in 2014, up from $528 million the year prior, which equated to 43 percent of its total income. $48 million of Planned Parenthood’s income was used for sex education, and $39 million was used for public policy, or to influence legislation, up from $33 million in 2013. Despite its expenditures, it still garnered a $61 million dollar profit.

Last month, thousands of women nationwide took to the streets to call for the defunding of the organization.

“They do not have mammograms. They do not provide prenatal care. They do not provide pediatric care, so it is not comprehensive healthcare for women,” participant Delia Laux of Virginia told reporters. “Planned Parenthood will say, ‘We’re not using that money for abortion. We’re using it for other services.’ The fact is money is refundable.”

A special message from the publisher...

Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. While we provide for the physical needs of the people, we seek to provide the eternal hope only found in Jesus Christ through the word of God. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work? Please click here to send an audio Bible to a refugee family >>

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  • InTheChurch

    Let the 75 companies give 100 million each to PP, no more tax money from government and they be held responsible for each child decapitated and dismembered for parts.

  • Audiophile

    “Don’t take away our right to kill someone we don’t want to bother with.”

    OK, ladies, what happens when YOU are one who is a burden to someone else? Is it OK to exterminate you?

    • Croquet_Player

      Let’s say I need a kidney transplant or I will die within weeks or days. A person arrives at the hospital with a terrible head injury from a bike collision, and promptly dies. Unless that person has given permission to be an organ donor before they died (or in case of a minor, their parents or guardians give permission), although I will surely die without them, there is no way I can requisition that corpse’s kidneys. Because that person has the right of bodily autonomy, even after death. Until we give the identical bodily autonomy to living women as we do to a dead body, and as long as a fetus is a subset of a person’s body, the point is moot.

      • Audiophile

        If you’re going to die in a few days, why are you trolling on Christian blogs? You should be setting your affairs in order, assuming you have any assets at all.

        • Tangent002

          Do you understand what a hypothetical is?

          • Croquet_Player

            Not yet, but we must always have hope. 😉

          • Croquet_Player

            Also, Audiophile knows. That’s why Audio had to pivot the argument to net worth. Which does nothing to support their point. It’s the equivalent of “HEY! I don’t like what you said! Maybe you’re POOR!” Yeah? What If am am poor? What if I am rich? What difference does it make?

        • Croquet_Player

          I’m not trolling. I’m not making fun of you, or calling you names. I’m trying to have a reasonable discussion. It is bizarre to me that you try to slam me on whether or not I have “assets” and you seem to imply that if I were poor, my argument would have less merit. Well, by your logic, the more money you have the better your argument is. Is this really what you think? So if someone has more money than you, their argument is more worthy? Come on. You know that isn’t true. It’s not that people are specious and insulting. I get that. It’s that they shy from a real discussion.

    • John

      An adult human is different than a fetus.

  • C_Alan_Nault

    PP are baby killers