(Christian News) — Major national financial institutions routinely used subjective reputational risk standards to restrict credit, deny services, or close accounts for customers based on political, social, or religious affiliations, according to a report released Wednesday by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The findings stem from an agency supervisory review that examined roughly 100,000 consumer complaints and scrutinized over 420,000 pages of internal bank records spanning 2020 through late 2025. The investigation targeted nine major lenders, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Capital One, PNC, TD Bank, U.S. Bank, and BMO Bank.
Federal regulators concluded that institutions systematically relied on vague corporate reputational guidelines rather than objective financial metrics. These qualitative policies allowed executive risk committees to terminate client relationships over concerns about brand image, media coverage, or ideological alignment.
The investigation documented patterns of service restrictions affecting conservative-leaning retailers, faith-based initiatives, and politically active organizations. Entire legal commercial sectors—such as firearms manufacturers, fossil fuel energy exploration, coal mining, and private detention facilities—also faced systemic access barriers under broad corporate policy frameworks. While the overwhelming majority of documented instances involved conservative and religious entities, investigators noted that non-financial risk criteria were occasionally applied across other political perspectives, including one documented instance where a financial institution rejected an organization supporting reproductive rights.
“Today’s report provides irrefutable evidence that the nation’s largest banks have denied, debanked, and discriminated against customers and lawful businesses,” said Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould, emphasizing that internal banking communications provided clear proof of clients being turned away over ideological and social considerations rather than credit risk.
In response, industry representatives pointed to formal bank policies prohibiting discrimination based on political or religious beliefs, noting that institutions operate within complex regulatory compliance frameworks designed to evaluate multi-faceted business risks.
Following the release of the report, federal regulators announced the removal of reputational risk considerations from standard bank supervisory procedures, with oversight agencies evaluating further regulatory updates to enforce objective, risk-based standards across the national banking system.
Become a Christian News Network Supporter...

